Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Faculties' Perceptions on the Importance and Performance of Effective Teaching Behaviors

대학교수의 효과적인 교수행동에 대한 중요도 인식과 실천 역량 분석

  • Lee, Soon-Deok (Department of Elementary Special Education, Nambu University)
  • 이순덕 (남부대학교 초등특수교육과)
  • Received : 2017.08.02
  • Accepted : 2017.11.03
  • Published : 2017.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed faculties' perceptions on the importance and performance of effective teaching behaviors. The effective teaching behaviors scale consisted of 40 items belonging to 8 factors. A survey was conducted with 86 faculties from 2 universities. It was found that the differences between the importance and performance levels of all items except for 'applying emphasis on important contents' were statistically significant. The scores of importance were higher than those of performance. The results of the IPA showed that 'keep up the good work' area included 19 items that those were high the scores of importance and performance. The 'concentrate here' area included 5 items that need to be improved for effective teaching. The first priority items needing to be improved were 1) Establishing instructional methods and strategies suitable for the objectives, 2) establishing clear objectives, appropriate examples and systematic classes, 3) providing questions, opportunities and appropriate feedback. We suggested that a faculty development program needs to be developed for effective teaching.

본 연구는 대학교육의 질을 제고하는 방향에서 효과적인 교수 학습을 위한 교수행동의 특성과 원리에 대한 교수들의 중요도와 실행도 인식과 차이를 분석하였다. 효과적인 교수행동은 8개 하위요인에 속하는 40개 항목으로 구성되었고, 이를 2개 대학 86명의 전임교수를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 효과적인 교수행동에 대한 중요도와 실행도 차이 분석결과, '중요 내용의 강조기법 적용' 항목을 제외한 모든 항목에서 유의한 차이를 보였다. 효과적인 교수행동 전략들은 중요도(M=4.48, SD=.39)에 비해 실행도(M=4.07, SD=.40)가 상대적으로 낮게 인식되었다. 또한 IPA 분석 결과, 전체 40개 항목 중 19개 항목은 중요도와 실행도가 높아 지속 유지해야 할 항목으로, 5개 항목은 중요도는 높으나 실행도가 낮아 개선노력 집중이 필요한 항목으로 도출되었다. 개선노력 집중 항목이면서 Borich 요구도 지수가 높아 교수들이 최우선적으로 개선해야 할 항목은 1) 수업목표에 적합한 수업방법과 전략 수립, 2) 명확한 목표, 적절한 예, 체계적인 수업 진행, 3) 학생에게 질문 기회 부여와 적절한 피드백 제공이 도출되었다. 교수들이 인식하는 효과적인 교수행동에 대한 인식과 실천 역량의 진단을 통해 교수개발 프로그램 구성을 위한 시사점을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Y. Kwon, S. Y. Shin, J. S. Kim, "A study on the importance and performance analysis of learner-centered education for improvement of teaching quality in university", Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 51-78, 2011.
  2. C. J. Song, "A study on the teaching and learning activities, student-teacher communication, and course satisfaction", Asian Journal of Education, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 171-200, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2014.15.2.007
  3. H. D. Song, S. Y. Jang, Y. K. Kim, "An need assessment of faculty member's job competencies according to the level of teaching experience", Asian Journal of Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 149-179, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2013.14.4.007
  4. H. J. Lee, J. H. Lee, "Analysis of university accreditation criteria for quality university teaching", Asian Journal of Education, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 173-204, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2008.9.3.008
  5. Y. H. Cho, S. Y. Park, "Exploration of a scale of effective teaching behaviors in university education", Andragogy Today Interdisciplinary Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 105-127, 2013.
  6. Y. S. Kil, "Characteristics of teaching methods and teaching behaviors used by the professors", The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 405-428, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2011.28.4.405
  7. C. K. Son, " A studies on the program development for teaching improvement of university faculty and the test of its effects", The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 121-150, 2003.
  8. Fairweather, J. S., "The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making", The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 26-48, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2002.0006
  9. Carrell, S., West, J., "Does professor quality matter? Evidence from random assignment of students to professors", Journal of Political Economy, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 409-432, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/653808
  10. E. H. Yang, J. S. Chung, "Needs analysis for improving teaching competency", The Korean Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 25-52, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.26.2.25
  11. Mayer, R. E., Applying the science of learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2011.
  12. S. G. Baek, E. H. Ham, J. Y. Lee, H. J. Shin, Y. L. Yu, "A theoretical inquiry on the construct for teaching competence in secondary school", Asian Journal of Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 47-69, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2007.8.1.003
  13. S. Y. Kwon, "Teachers' conceptions of good teaching in secondary school: the analysis of importance and performance", The Korean Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 185-215, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.26.1.185
  14. K. W. Chang, H. J. Kim, "Teaching competencies for learner-centered education and comparison of the perception of pre-service and in-service teachers", Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 285-310, 2012.
  15. S. H. Kang, " Pre-service teachers' perceptions of the importance and performance of effective teaching behaviors", Journal of Korean Contents, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 520-528, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.02.520
  16. M. J. Park, "Students' perceptions of good teaching in higher education", Humanities Research, 75, pp. 229-253, 2008.
  17. S. J. Yune, "Analysis of good college teaching characteristics by multi-faceted approach", Jour. Fish. Mar. Sci. Edu., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 963-976, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2012.24.6.963
  18. Alexander, A., Karvonen, M., Ulrich, J., Davis, T., Wade, A., "Community college faculty competencies", Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 849-862, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2010.515511
  19. Tigelaar, D. E., Dolmans, D. H., Wolfhagen, I. H., Van der Vleuten, C. P., "The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education", Higher Education, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 253-268, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000034318.74275.e4
  20. Y. S. Kwon, "An analysis of factors of effective lecturing behaviors in university class", Doctoral dissertation Yonsei university, 2006.
  21. W. S. Lim, Y. C. Kim, "Analysis of the professor's core lecture competency", The Journal of Educational Administration, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 413-434, 2007.
  22. I. H. Jeong, E. J. Lee, "Educational needs analysis depending on professors' position for teaching competency reinforcement. Journal of Korean HRD Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-22, 2012.
  23. H. Y. Lee, Y. S. Kim, H. O. Heo, "The development of a inventory for teaching competency in colleges of engineering", The Korean Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 439-469, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.28.3.439
  24. Sergiovanni, T., & Starratt, R., Supervision: A redefinition. Boston, Ma: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
  25. Borich, G. D., Effective teaching methods (7th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2011.
  26. M. S. Kim, "Characteristics and types of caring professors perceived by college students", The Korean Journal of Educational psychology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 61-86, 2011.
  27. Kember, D., "Promoting student-centred forms of learning across an entire university", Higher Education, 58, 1-13, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9177-6
  28. S. Y. Lee, S. Y. Hong, "Promoting teaching efficacy of pre-service teachers with reflective thinking using e-portfolio", Journal of Korean Contents, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 968-978, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.11.968
  29. S. A. Oh, S. D. Lee, "Epistemological beliefs and perspectives about good teacher and good instructional practices between in-service and pre-service teachers", The Journal of Korean Educational Forum, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25-45, 2011.