Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine (대한예방의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Associations of the Neighborhood Environment With Substance Use: A Cross-sectional Investigation Among Patients in Compulsory Drug Detention Centers in Thailand

  • Received : 2017.09.08
  • Accepted : 2017.12.07
  • Published : 2018.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the associations of characteristics of the neighborhood environment with substance abuse among clients receiving treatment for drug abuse in Thailand. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted of 1128 drug addicts from 28 neighborhoods who were receiving treatment at all 7 compulsory drug detention centers in Thailand. A trained interviewer conducted structured interviews with the subjects about substance use and the perceived neighborhood environment in their community. A multilevel logistic regression model was applied to estimate the effects of the neighborhood environment on substance use. Results: The majority of participants, 53.8% only used methamphetamine pills, 31.3% used other illicit drugs as well as methamphetamine pills, and 14.9% used an illicit drug other than methamphetamine. Three neighborhood characteristics were associated with substance use. A 1-unit increase in the perceived neighborhood cohesion score was associated with a 15% reduction in methamphetamine pill use and an 11% reduction of the use of both methamphetamine pills and another illicit drug. Conversely, a 1-unit increase in perceived neighborhood crime predicted 19 and 14% increases in the use of methamphetamine pills and the use of both methamphetamine pills and another illicit drug, respectively. In addition, a 1-unit increase in the scores for stigma surrounding addiction corresponded to a 25% increase of the use of methamphetamine pills and a 12% increase in the use of both methamphetamine pills and another illicit drug. Conclusions: Substance use among drug addicts was influenced by characteristics of the neighborhood environment. Therefore, prevention and intervention strategies should be designed based on a consideration of the impact of neighborhood context on substance use behaviors.

Keywords

References

  1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World drug report 2016 [cited 2016 Nov 23]. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/wdr2016/.
  2. Werb D, Kamarulzaman A, Meacham MC, Rafful C, Fischer B, Strathdee SA, et al. The effectiveness of compulsory drug treatment: a systematic review. Int J Drug Policy 2016;28:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.005
  3. Kamarulzaman A, McBrayer JL. Compulsory drug detention centers in East and Southeast Asia. Int J Drug Policy 2015;26 Suppl 1:S33-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.11.011
  4. Thai Office of the Council of State. Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act 2002 [cited 2015 Dec 20]. Available from: http://web.krisdika.go.th/data/law/law2/%bf01/%bf01-20-2545-a0001.pdf (Thai).
  5. Department of Probation. Statistics of drug offenders in Thailand [cited 2015 Jan 10]. Available from: http://164.115.41.115/doc_dop/file/categories2/20180110023613-0026101014.pdf (Thai).
  6. Rodriguez N, Katz C, Webb VJ, Schaefer DR. Examining the impact of individual, community, and market factors on methamphetamine use: a tale of two cities. J Drug Issues 2005; 35(4):665-693. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260503500402
  7. Kunarak K. The development of a recidivism prevention on drug users model: a case study of the juvenile observation and protection department [dissertation]. Bangkok: Silpakorn University; 2012 (Thai).
  8. Rogers JD, Ramaswamy M, Cheng CI, Richter K, Kelly PJ. Perceptions of neighborhood social environment and drug dependence among incarcerated women and men: a cross-sectional analysis. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2012;7(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-7-39
  9. Tomori C, Go VF, Tuan le N, Huong NM, Binh NT, Zelaya CE, et al. "In their perception we are addicts": social vulnerabilities and sources of support for men released from drug treatment centers in Vietnam. Int J Drug Policy 2014;25(5):897-904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.04.012
  10. Thomson N. Detention as treatment: detention of methamphetamine users in Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand; 2010 [cited 2017 Dec 30]. Available from: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/Detention-as-Treatment- 20100301.pdf.
  11. Kallanasute K, Surapat A, Kaewseengam J. The evaluation of rehabilitation of offenders in communities. Bangkok: Department of Probation, Ministry of Justice; 2010, p. 57 (Thai).
  12. Galea S, Nandi A, Vlahov D. The social epidemiology of substance use. Epidemiol Rev 2004;26(1):36-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxh007
  13. Duncan SC, Duncan TE, Strycker LA. A multilevel analysis of neighborhood context and youth alcohol and drug problems. Prev Sci 2002;3(2):125-133. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015483317310
  14. Embry D, Hankins M, Biglan A, Boles S. Behavioral and social correlates of methamphetamine use in a population-based sample of early and later adolescents. Addict Behav 2009; 34(4):343-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.11.019
  15. Shareck M, Ellaway A. Neighbourhood crime and smoking: the role of objective and perceived crime measures. BMC Public Health 2011;11:930. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-930
  16. Theall KP, Sterk CE, Elifson KW. Perceived neighborhood fear and drug use among young adults. Am J Health Behav 2009; 33(4):353-365.
  17. Patterson JM, Eberly LE, Ding Y, Hargreaves M. Associations of smoking prevalence with individual and area level social cohesion. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58(8):692-697. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.009167
  18. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 1997;277(5328):918-924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918
  19. Mennis J, Stahler GJ, Mason MJ. Risky substance use environments and addiction: a new frontier for environmental justice research. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016;13(6):607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13060607
  20. Boardman JD, Finch BK, Ellison CG, Williams DR, Jackson JS. Neighborhood disadvantage, stress, and drug use among adults. J Health Soc Behav 2001;42(2):151-165. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090175
  21. Livingston JD, Milne T, Fang ML, Amari E. The effectiveness of interventions for reducing stigma related to substance use disorders: a systematic review. Addiction 2012;107(1):39-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03601.x
  22. Cheng Y, Sherman SG, Srirat N, Vongchak T, Kawichai S, Jittiwutikarn J, et al. Risk factors associated with injection initiation among drug users in Northern Thailand. Harm Reduct J 2006;3:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-3-10
  23. Byrnes HF, Miller BA, Chamratrithirong A, Rhucharoenpornpanich O, Cupp PK, Atwood KA, et al. The roles of perceived neighborhood disorganization, social cohesion, and social control in urban Thai adolescents' substance use and delinquency. Youth Soc 2013;45(3):404-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X11421940
  24. Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological models of human development. Int Encycl Educ 1994;3(2):1643-1647.
  25. Silins E, Fergusson DM, Patton GC, Horwood LJ, Olsson CA, Hutchinson DM, et al. Adolescent substance use and educational attainment: an integrative data analysis comparing cannabis and alcohol from three Australasian cohorts. Drug Alcohol Depend 2015;156:90-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.034
  26. Buckner JC. The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. Am J Community Psychol 1988; 16(6):771-791. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00930892
  27. Rosenberg D, Ding D, Sallis JF, Kerr J, Norman GJ, Durant N, et al. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale for Youth (NEWS-Y): reliability and relationship with physical activity. Prev Med 2009;49(2-3):213-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.011
  28. Martinez SM, Blanco E, Delva J, Burrows R, Reyes M, Lozoff B, et al. Perception of neighborhood crime and drugs increases cardiometabolic risk in Chilean adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2014;54(6):718-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.10.207
  29. Kanato M, Leyatikul P. Thai addiction stigma scale. Community Health Dev 2014; 2(2):1-18 (Thai).
  30. Lin EY, Witten K, Casswell S, You RQ. Neighbourhood matters: perceptions of neighbourhood cohesiveness and associations with alcohol, cannabis and tobacco use. Drug Alcohol Rev 2012;31(4):402-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00385.x
  31. Ahern J, Galea S, Hubbard A, Syme SL. Neighborhood smoking norms modify the relation between collective efficacy and smoking behavior. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009;100(1-2):138-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.012
  32. Office of the Narcotics Control Board. Drug abuse prevention and solving action plan in 2015-2019 [cited 2015 Dec 1]. Available from: https://www.opdc.go.th/uploads/files/2558/att1203.2_v19_58_1.pdf (Thai).
  33. Tucker JS, Pollard MS, de la Haye K, Kennedy DP, Green HD Jr. Neighborhood characteristics and the initiation of marijuana use and binge drinking. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013;128(1-2) :83-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.08.006
  34. De Haan L, Boljevac T, Schaefer K. Rural community characteristics, economic hardship, and peer and parental influences in early adolescent alcohol use. J Early Adolesc 2009;30(5):629-650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609341045
  35. Yabiku ST, Dixon Rayle A, Okamoto SK, Marsiglia FF, Kulis S. The effect of neighborhood context on the drug use of American Indian youth of the Southwest. J Ethn Subst Abuse 2007; 6(2):181-204. https://doi.org/10.1300/J233v06n02_11
  36. Kepple NJ, Freisthler B. Exploring the ecological association between crime and medical marijuana dispensaries. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2012;73(4):523-530. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2012.73.523
  37. Hadley-Ives E, Stiffman AR, Elze D, Johnson S. D, Dore P. Measuring neighborhood and school environments perceptual and aggregate approaches. J Hum Behav Soc Environ 2000;3(1):1-28. https://doi.org/10.1300/J137v03n01_01
  38. Luo T, Wang J, Li Y, Wang X, Tan L, Deng Q, et al. Stigmatization of people with drug dependence in China: a community-based study in Hunan province. Drug Alcohol Depend 2014;134:285-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.10.015
  39. Kanato M, Yangyuen S. Situation and outcome of drugs treatment in compulsory drug treatment system in Thailand: case study of hospitals under department of medical services. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen University; 2017, p. 121 (Thai).
  40. Foo YC, Tam CL, Lee TH. Family factors and peer influence in drug abuse: a study in rehabilitation centre. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Health 2012;4(3):190-201.

Cited by

  1. Drug use among agriculture-related workers in Thailand vol.8, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18994.1