Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology (한국식품과학회지)

Korean Society of Food Science and Technology (한국식품과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality characteristics of whey makgeolli vinegar produced using Acetobacter pomorum IWV-03

유청 막걸리 식초 제조용 Acetobacter pomorum IWV-03 아세트산세균 분리 및 식초의 품질특성

  • Park, Jun-Ki (Department of Food Science and Technology, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Huh, Chang-Ki (Department of Food Science and Technology, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Gim, Do-Woo (Department of Food Science and Technology, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Kim, Yu-Jin (Department of Food Science and Technology, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Hwan (Imsil Cheese & Food Research Institute) ;
  • Kwon, Yoon-Kyung (Imsil Cheese & Food Research Institute) ;
  • Bae, Dal (Gwanseong Takju consolidation berewery) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Doo (Department of Food Science and Technology, Sunchon National University)
  • 박준기 (순천대학교 식품공학과) ;
  • 허창기 (순천대학교 식품공학과) ;
  • 김도우 (순천대학교 식품공학과) ;
  • 김유진 (순천대학교 식품공학과) ;
  • 김수환 ((재)임실치즈앤식품연구소) ;
  • 권윤경 ((재)임실치즈앤식품연구소) ;
  • 배달 (관성탁주합동주조장) ;
  • 김용두 (순천대학교 식품공학과)
  • Received : 2017.09.30
  • Accepted : 2017.11.07
  • Published : 2018.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop various types of vinegar using whey. Amongst various acetic acidproducing strains, Acetobacter pomorum IWV-03 strain was selected as an excellent strain for the production of whey makgeolli vinegar. The acidity of this vinegar was found to be 5.6%. The total organic acid content and the free amino acid content of the whey makgeolli vinegar were 5.5 and 5.9 mg%, respectively, which was higher than that of the control makgeolli vinegar (5.0 and 4.5 mg%, respectively). In addition, DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activity of whey makgeolli vinegar were 49.85 and 63.46%, respectively, which were again higher than that of control makgeolli vinegar (27.20 and 19.22%, respectively).

본 연구는 폐기 되는 유청의 새로운 처리와 소득원 창출 및 다양한 유형의 발효 식초를 개발하고자 유청 막걸리를 이용하여 초산 생성능이 우수한 초산 균주를 분리 및 동정 하고, 유청 막걸리 발효 식초 제조 및 품질특성을 확인하였다. 그 결과 초산생성 균주는 10개 균주가 선발 되었다. 균주의 동정 결과 Acetobacter pasteurianus 균주가 6종, Acetobacter pomorum 균주가 4종으로 확인 되었다. Acetobacter pomorum IWV-03 균주가 유청 발효식초 제조용 우수 균주로 최종 선정하였다. 유청 막걸리 식초의 산도는 유청 막걸리 식초 5.6%, 막걸리 식초 5.1%의 함량이었다. 유청 막걸리 식초의 발효 기간에 따른 에탄올 함량은 발효 21일째의 유청 막걸리로 제조한 식초가 1.6%, 일반 막걸리로 제조한 식초 0.7%의 함량을 보였다. 유청 막걸리 식초의 색도를 전체적으로 비교했을 때 두 시료구간의 L, a, b값은 약간의 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 식초의 무기성분은 유청 막걸리와 일반 막걸리의 첨가에 따라 차이가 있었는데 calcium의 경우 유청 막걸리 식초가 205.75 mg%, 일반 막걸리 식초가 173.08 mg%로 유청 막걸리로 제조한 식초의 함량이 더 높았다. 유청 막걸리 식초의 총 유기산 함량은 유청 막걸리 식초 5,453.99 mg%, 일반 막걸리 식초 4,974.70 mg%로 유청 막걸리로 제조한 식초의 함량이 더 높았으며 acetic acid가 주요 유기산임을 확인하였다. 유청 막걸리 식초의 유리아미노산 함량은 유청 막걸리로 제조한 식초가 5,905.19 mg%, 일반 막걸리로 제조한 식초 4,529.71 mg%로 유청 막걸리가 첨가된 시료구에서 높은 함량을 보였다. 또한 필수아미노산 함량도 유청 막걸리로 제조한 식초 2,061.34 mg%, 일반 막걸리로 제조한 식초 1,484.20 mg%로 각각 총 유리아미노산의 함량의 38.1, 32.7%를 차지하였다. DPPH radical 소거 활성은 유청 막걸리 식초 49.85%, 일반 막걸리 식초 27.20%로 유청 막걸리로 제조한 식초에서 높은 활성을 보였으며 ABTS radical 환원력은 DPPH radical 소거 활성 측정 결과와 마찬가지로 유청 막걸리 식초 63.46%, 일반 막걸리 식초 19.22%로 유청 막걸리로 제조한 식초가 일반 막걸리로 제조한 식초에 비해 환원력이 더 높게 나타났다. 이를 토대로 유청 막걸리를 이용하여 식초를 제조할 경우 유청의 새로운 처리와 식초 개발 연구를 통한 식초의 다양화 및 고급화 기여에 적합할 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim HU. Milk processing technology: Based process.manufac-ture of milk product. 3rd edition. Sun Jin Publishing Co,. Seoul, Korea. p. 517 (1999)
  2. Ronsivalli LJ, Vieira ER. Elementary food science. 3rd edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New york, NY, USA. p. 226 (1990)
  3. Visser S. Proteolytic enzymes and their action on milk proteins. A review. Neth, Milk Dairy J. 35: 65 (1981)
  4. Kosikowski FV. Whey utilization and whey products. J. Dairy Sci. 62: 1149-1155 (1979) https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(79)83389-5
  5. Abubakar A, Saito T, Kitazawa H, Kawai Y, Itoh T. Structural analysis of new antihypertensive peptides derived from cheese whey protein by proteinase K digestion. J. Dairy Sci. 81: 3131-3138 (1998) https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75878-3
  6. Evans M, Gordon JF. Whey proteins applied protein chemistry. Applied Science publishers LTD, London, UK. pp. 31-67 (1980)
  7. Mathur B.N, Shahani K.M. Use of total whey constituents for human food. J Dairy Sci. 62: 99-105 (1979) https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(79)83209-9
  8. Ernest JM. Whey utilization in foods. Int Dairy J. 47: 22-23 (1982)
  9. Woo SM, Jo YJ, Lee SW, Kwon JH, Yeo SH, Jeong YJ. Quality comparison of static-culture and commercial brown rice vinegar. Korean J. Food Preserv. 19: 301-307 (2012) https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2012.19.2.301
  10. Jo JS. The types and characteristics of vinegar. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 17: 38-60 (1984)
  11. Yoon HN. Simultaneous gas chromatographic analysis of ethanol and acetic acid in vinegar. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 30: 1247-1251 (1998)
  12. Casale M, Saiz Abajo MJ, Gonzalez Saiz JM, Pizarro C, Forina M. Study of the aging and oxidation processes of vinegar samples from different origins during storage by near-infrared spectroscopy. Analy. Chim. Acta. 557: 360-366 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.10.063
  13. Joo KH, Cho MH, Park KJ, Jeong SW. Effects of fermentation method and brown rice content on quality characteristics of brown rice vinegar. Korean J. Food Preserv. 16: 33-39 (2009)
  14. Kim MY, Min SG. Effect of inoculation level of starter culture (Acetobacter aceti) and acetic acid addition on fermentation of makgeolli vinegar. MS Thesis. Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea. (2011)
  15. Shin JA, Oh NS. Optimization of fermentation process for acetic acid production. Food Engineer. Prog. 14: 217-221 (2010)
  16. Cha YJ, Park KJ, Kim DK, Chun HS, Lee BK, Kim KH, Lee SY and Kim SJ. Isolation and characterization of cellulose producing Acetobacter xylinum KI strain. Kor. J. Appl. Microbiol Biotechnol. 22: 571-576 (1994)
  17. Wan M, Rosenberg JN, Faruq J, Betenbaugh MJ, Xia J. An improved colony PCR procedure for genetic screening of chlorella and related microalgae. Biotechnol Lett. 33: 1615-1619 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0596-6
  18. Woo SJ, Ryoo SS. Preparation methods for atomic absorption spectrometry of food samples. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 15: 225-230 (1983)
  19. Gancedo MC, Luh BS. HPLC analysis of organic acids and sugar in tomato juice. J. Food Sci. 51: 571-580 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb13881.x
  20. Ohara I, Ariyoshi S. Comparison of protein precipitants for the determination of free amino acid in plasma. Agric. Biol Chem. pp. 1473-1478 (1979)
  21. Abe N, Nemoto A, Tsuchiya Y, Hojo H, Hirota A. Study of the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging mechanism for a 2-pyrone compound. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 64: 306-333 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.64.306
  22. Yamachuchi T, Takamura H, Matobe T, Terao J. HPLC method for evalution of the free radical-scavenging activity of foods by 1,1-diphrnyl-2-picrylhydrazyl. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 62: 1201-1204 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.62.1201
  23. Blois MS. Antioxidant determination by the use of a table gree radical. Nature 26: 1199-1744 (1958)
  24. Roberta R, Nicoletta P, Anna P, Ananth P, Min Y, Catherine RE. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free radic. biol. Med. 26: 1231-1237 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3
  25. Yeo SH, Jeong YJ, Kwon JH. Quality comparison of commercial cider vinegars by their acidity levels. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 44: 699-703 (2012) https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2012.44.6.699
  26. KEDA. Korea food standard code. Korea Food and Drug Administration. Cheongwon, Korea. pp 5-21-1 (2012)
  27. Lee SW, Kwon JH, Yoon SR, Woo SM, Jang SY, Yeo SH, Choi JH, Jeong YJ. Quality characteristics of brown rice vinegar by different yeasts and fermentation condition. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 39: 1366-1372 (2010) https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.9.1366
  28. Yoon JR. Quality characteristics of vinegar added with sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) leaf extract and berry juice by different fermentation methods. PhD Thesis. Myongji University, Seoul, Korea (2014)
  29. Hong SM, Kang MJ, Lee JH, Jeong JH, Kwon SH, Seo KI. Production of vinegar using Rubus coreanus and its antioxidant activities. Korean J. Food Preserv. 19: 594-603 (2012) https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2012.19.4.594
  30. Ko EJ, Hur SS, Choi YH. The establishment of optimum cultural conditions for manufacturing garlic vinegarJ. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 27: 102-10 (1998)
  31. Woo SM, Shin JS, Seong JH Yeo SH, Choi JH, Kim TY, Jeong YJ. Quality characteristics of brown rice makgeolli by different nuruks. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 39: 301-307 (2010) https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.2.301
  32. Baek CH, Choi JH, Choi HS, Jeong, ST, Kim JH, Jeong YJ, Yeo SH. Quality characteristics of brown rice makgeolli produced under differing conditions. Korean J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41: 168-175 (2013) https://doi.org/10.4014/kjmb.1210.10005
  33. Johansen AG, Vegarud GE, Skeie S. Seasonal and regional variation in the composition of whey from norwegian cheddar-type and dutch-type cheeses. Int Dairy. J. 12: 621-629 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(02)00054-7
  34. Kim SH, Huh CK, Kim SM, Cho IK, Kim YD. Quality characteristics of whey makgeolli by Kluyveromyces marxianus. MS Thesis. Sunchon University, Sunchon, Jeonnam, Korea. (2015)
  35. Lee HS. Quality characteristics of Takju prepared by cooked and uncooked rice. MS Thesis. Chungju National University, Chungju, Chungbuk, Korea (2009)
  36. Yulkimichi K, Yasuhiro U, Fujihara Y. The general composition inorganic cations free amino acids and organic acid of special vinegars. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi. 34: 592-598 (1987) https://doi.org/10.3136/nskkk1962.34.9_592
  37. Anne Pihlanto. Antioxidative peptides derived from milk proteins. International Dairy J. 16: 1306-1314 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2006.06.005
  38. Awika JM, Rooney LW, Wu X, Prior RL, Cisneros-Zevallos L. Screening methods to measure antioxidant activity of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and sorghum products. J. Agr. Food Chem. 51: 6657-6662 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1021/jf034790i