DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

문해교육 학습자의 학습만족도가 학습지속에 미치는 영향

Literacy learner's satisfaction revel and effects on Learning consistence

  • 양복이 (대구한의학교 대학원 평생교육융합학과) ;
  • 김진숙 (대구한의대학교 평생교육융합학과)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.13
  • 심사 : 2018.09.24
  • 발행 : 2018.11.30

초록

본 연구는 문해교육 학습자의 학습만족도가 학습지속에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위해 울산광역시의 문해교육 학습자 206명을 대상으로 분석하였다. 분석결과 첫째, 문해교육 학습자의 학습만족도를 하위변인으로 살펴보면 학습환경에서 가장 높았고 교육강사, 학습결과, 학습내용 순으로 나타났으며, 일반적 특성에서는 학습참여가 길수록 학습내용과 학습결과에 높은 만족도를 보였다. 둘째, 문해교육 학습자의 일반적 특성이 학습지속에 미치는 영향을 살펴보면 성별은 차이가 없었으나, 70세 이상의 연령에서 학습지속의 높은 의사표시를 나타냈다. 셋째, 문해교육 학습자의 학습만족도가 학습지속에 미치는 상관관계를 살펴보면, 학습내용, 교육강사, 학습결과, 학습환경 순으로 상관관계를 나타냈다. 이상을 종합한 결과, 문해교육 학습자는 나이가 많고 학습참여가 길수록 학습만족도가 높았고, 일상생활에 필요한 경우 학습지속이 높았으며, 문해교육 학습자가 학습지속에 미치는 영향은 학습 내용임이 분석되었다.

In order to find how their learning satisfaction to impact on continuous learning, this study analyzed 206 participants who are learners under the literacy education from Ulsan city. With the first results, when looking over their learning satisfaction, we found that the level of satisfaction was the highest at the educational environment following teacher quality, learning results and contents sequentially. In general characteristics, the longer is learning attending and the satisfier is education contents and learning satisfaction. With the second results, when we look over how the general characteristics of literacy learners to impact on continuous learning, those who are over 70 years old expressed the higher rate on continuous learning. With the third results, considering the correlation between learning satisfaction and continuous learning, we concluded that the first was education contents, the second was teacher quality, the third was learning results and the last was learning environment. Consequently, we found that for literacy learners, the older and longer attending and the higher satisfaction, in addition, the continuous learning was higher according to needs of everyday life and the education contents impacted on continuous learning.

키워드

표 1. 문해교육 학습자의 학습만족도 Table 1. The satisfaction level of the literacy education learners

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_173_t0001.png 이미지

표 2. 문해교육학습자의 일반적 특성에 따른 교육강사 만족도 Table 2.. The satisfaction level on teachers according to the general characteristics of literacy education learners

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_173_t0002.png 이미지

표 3. 문해교육학습자의 일반적 특성에 따른 학습내용 만족도 Table 3. The satisfaction level on education contents according to the general characteristics of literacy education learners

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_173_t0003.png 이미지

표 4. 문해교육학습자의 일반적 특성에 따른 학습환경 만족도 Table 4. The satisfaction level on the learning environment according to the general characteristics of literacy education learners

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_173_t0004.png 이미지

표 5. 문해교육학습자의 일반적 특성에 따른 학습결과 만족도 Table 5. The satisfaction level on learning results according to the general characteristics of literacy education learners

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_173_t0005.png 이미지

표 6. 문해교육 학습자의 일반적 특성에 따른 학습지속 여부 Table 6. The continuous learning on literacy learners according to the general characteristics of literacy education learners

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_173_t0006.png 이미지

표 7. 문해교육 학습자의 학습만족도와 학습지속과의 상관관계 Table 7. The correlation between learning satisfaction and continuous learning of the literacy education learners

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_173_t0007.png 이미지

표 8. 문해교육 학습자의 학습만족도와 학습지속에 미치는 영향 Table 8. The impacts on the learning satisfaction and continuous learning from the literacy education learners

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_173_t0008.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Mi-Jeong Kim. The correlation between attending motivation and learning satisfaction of the literacy education learners. Jeonbuk University Education Graduate School / Master's degree paper.2017.
  2. Jeong-Sook Seong. Research of literacy education status and satisfaction for adult women. Kyungnam University Education Graduate School / Master's degree paper. 2008.
  3. Soo-Myung Yang. Satisfaction study of Old learners according to attending characteristics of literacy education. Around Daegu city. Daegu University Education Graduate School / Administration Master's degree paper. 2009.
  4. Young-Ju Lee. Elimination f 'a mi-parcours analysis of USA on-line teacher training program for the gifted and talented. Korea teacher education study, Vol 27, No. 3. 2010.
  5. Ha-Hyung Lee. Ulsan Pureun School principal's interview. 2017.
  6. Hey-Kyung Lim. Literacy education program of Sangju university(Cases study): Focus on continuous attending & hindrance causes. Aju university Master's degree paper. 2015.
  7. Hye-Ryung Jeong. Study on adult students' perception on credit recognition regarding the preceding experience learning. Korea Adult Education School. Vol. 18, No. 3. 2015.
  8. Sung-Yeon Cho, Mi-Ran Moon. Study on variables impacting on learning achievement of adult learners. Education science study. Vol. 45, No. 2. 2007.
  9. Jae-Cheol Cho, Jin-Sok Kim. Impact of Adult ADHD Tendency on Self-Estem and Alcohol Adiction. The Joumal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp.165-174. 2018.
  10. National Literacy Education Center, Adult Literacy Education. https://le.or.kr/contentView.do
  11. National Institute for Lifetime Education. www.nile.or.kr
  12. Korea Literacy Education Association. cafe.daum.net/Korea Literacy. 2007.
  13. Daeri Association. Life Education Ordinance partial amends draft passed on the Cabinet meeting, The difference of Education charge is 5.2 times between high class and low class of 20%. 2016.