[그림 1] 수학적 모델링(정혜윤 외, 2018) [Fig. 1] Mathematical Modeling(Jung et al., 2018)
[그림 2] 학생들에게 제공된 활동지의 예 [Fig. 2] Examples of activity sheet provided to students
[그림 4] 실세계 탐구 단계에서 관찰된 A조의 상호보완적 상호작용 사례 [Fig. 4] Example of mutually complementary interaction observed in the real-world inquiry stage of group A
[그림 5] 문제에 영향 미치는 요인 찾기 단계에서 관찰된 A조의 상호보완적 상호작용 사례 [Fig. 5] Example of mutually complementary interaction observed in the factor-finding stage of group A
[그림 6] B조의 모델링 과정에서 관찰된 상호보완적 상호작용과 갈등 기반 상호작용의 연결 사례 [Fig. 6] Example of connection between mutually complementary and conflict-based interaction observed in the modeling process of group B
[그림 7] 단순화하기 단계에서 관찰된 B조의 갈등 기반 상호작용 사례 [Fig. 7] Example of conflict-based interaction observed in the simplification stage of group B
[그림 8] 단순화하기 단계에서 관찰된 A조의 메타인지적 상호작용 사례 [Fig. 8] Example of metacognitive interaction observed in the simplification stage of group A
[그림 9] 수학적 모델 도출 단계에서 관찰된 A조의 메타인지적 상호작용 사례 [Fig. 9] Example of metacognitive interaction observed in the mathematical model derivation stage of group A
[그림 10] 수학적 모델 도출 과정에서 관찰된 B조의 비 상호작용 사례 [Fig. 10] Example of non-interaction observed in the mathematical model derivation stage of group B
[그림 3] 수학적 모델링 과정에서 관찰된 상호작용과 모델링 과정의 표현틀 [Fig. 3] Representation framework of interaction and modeling process observed in mathematical modeling process
[표 1] 각 유형의 상호작용이 수학적 모델링에 미치는 효과 [Table 1] Effects of each type of interaction on mathematical modeling
References
- Ministry of Education. (2015). Mathematical curriculum. Seoul: Author.
- Kim, M. K., Hong, J. Y., & Kim. E. K. (2009). Exploration of teaching method through analysis of cases of mathematical modeling in elementary mathematics. The Mathematical Education 48(4), 365-385.
- Kim, M. K., Hong, J. Y., & Kim. H. W. (2010). A study on development of problem contexts for an application to mathematical modeling. The Mathematical Education 49(3), 313-328.
- Kim, B. M. (2018). Characteristics of tasks for group creativity in mathematics learning related with mobile, on/off-line. Proceedings of the 52nd Conference on Mathematics Education 52, 159-161.
- Kim, S. Y. (2017). An in-depth conceptual analysis of synergy in group collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology 33(1), 75-104. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.33.1.075
- Kim, S. H. & Kim, K. Y. (2004). Analysis on types and roles of reasoning used in the mathematical modeling process. School Mathematics 6(3), 283-299.
- Kim, Y. C. (2007). Group creativity: How it could be effective?. The Journal of Thinking Development 3(1), 1-26.
- Kim, H. J. & Seol, H. D. (2014). Mediating effects of integrative capability and knowledge sharing on the relationship between individual creativity and group creativity. Knowledge Management Research 15(4), 223-247. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2014.15.4.012
- Park, J. H. (2017). Fostering mathematical creativity by mathematical modeling. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 27(1), 69-88.
- Park, J. H. & Lee, K. H. (2014). A study on meta-level learning through modeling activities. School Mathematics 16(3), 409-444.
- Sung, J. H. & Lee, C. H. (2017a). A study on the manifestation process model development of group creativity among mathematically gifted students. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 27(3), 557-580.
- Sung, J. H. & Lee, C. H. (2017b). An analysis on the products and process losses of group creativity among mathematically gifted students. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Educaion in Korea 21(3), 505-530.
- Shin, E. J. & Lee, C. H. (2004). An analysis of the interaction of perceptive, cognitive, and metacognitive activities on the middle school students' modeling activity. School Mathematics 6(2), 153-179.
- Woo, J. H., Chong, Y. O., Park, K. M., Lee, K. H., Kim, N. H., Na, G. S., Yim, J. H. (2014). Research methodology in mathematics education. Seoul: Kyungmoonsa.
- Lew. K. H. (2015). A comparative study on effects of home and classroom environment on individual creativity and group creativity. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented 14(1), 201-222.
- Lee, K. H. (2016). Reanalysis of realistic mathematics education perspective in relation to cultivation of mathematical creativity. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 26(1), 47-62.
- Lee, S. Y., Kim, C. J., Choe, S. U., Yoo, J. H., Park, H. J., Kang, E. H., Kim, H. B. (2012). Exploring the patterns of group model development about blood flow in the heart and reasoning process by small group interaction. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 32(5), 805-822. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.5.805
-
Jung, H. Y., Lee, K. H., Baek, D. H., Jung, J. H., & Lim, K. S. (2018). Design for
subject’s task based on the mathematical modeling perspective. School Mathematics 20(1), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2018.03.20.1.149 - Cho, M. J. & Jin, S. U. (2016). A phenomenological study on group creativity emerging precess experiences of gifted students in elementary schools. The Journal of Creativity Education 16(2), 35-59.
- Cho, M. K. & Kim, M. K. (2016). A study on peer interactions according to a teacher’s scaffolding in ill-structured mathematical problem solving. The Journal of Elementary Education, 29(4), 227-255.
- Hwang, H. J. (2007). A study of understanding mathematical modelling. School Mathematics 9(1), 65-97.
- Artzt, A. F. & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small group. Cognition and Instruction, 9(2), 137-175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0902_3
- Bliss, K. & Libertini, J. (2016). What is mathematical modeling? In Garfunkel, S., & Montgomery, M. (Eds.), Guidelines for Assessment & Instruction in Mathematical Modeling Education(GAIMME) (pp. 7-21).
- BlmhOj, M. (2011). Modelling competency: Teaching, learning and assessing competencies - Overview. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.). Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 343-347). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Blum, W. & Ferri, R. B. (2009). Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45-58.
- Chan, C. M. E. (2008). The use of mathematical modeling tasks to develop creativity, In E. Veikova, & A. Andzans (Eds.), Promoting creativity for all students in mathematics education (pp. 207-216). Bulgaria: University of Rousse.
- Chamberlin, S. A. & Moon, S. M. (2005). Model-eliciting activities as a tool develop and identify creatively gifted mathematicians. The Journal of Gifted Education, 17(1), 37-47.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). 연구방법 : 질적, 양적 혼합적 연구의 설계 (정종진, 김영숙, 성용구, 성장환, 류성림, 박판우, 유승희, 임남숙, 임청환, 허재복 역), 서울: 시그마프레스. (원저 2013년 출판)
- Doerr, H. M. (2007). What knowledge do teachers need for teaching mathematics through applications and modelling?. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 69-78). New York: Springer.
- English, L. D. (2006). Mathematical modeling in the primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 303-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9013-1
- English, L. D. & Sriraman, B. (2010). Problem solving for the 21st century. In B. Sriraman, & L. English (Eds.), Theories of Mathematics Education (pp. 263-301). Berlin: Springer.
- Galbraith, P. & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process. ZDM, 38(2), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655886
- Gravemeijer, K. (2002). Preamble: From models to modeling. In K. Gravemijer, R. Lehrer, B. Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, Modeling and Tool Use in Mathematics Education (pp. 7-22).
- Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied theomatic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
- James, M. A. (2015). Managing the classroom for creativity. Creative Education, 6(10), 1032-1043. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.610102
- Kaiser, G. (2007). Modelling and modelling competencies in school. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan, (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 110-119). Chichester: Horwood Publishing.
- Kurtzberg, T. R. & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_06
- Lesh, R., Cramer, K., Doerr, H., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. (2003). Model development sequences. In R. Lesh, & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving (pp. 35-58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge talk amongst teachers and learners. Neil Mercer. [Electronic Resource].
- Milliken, F. J., Bartel, C. A., & Kurtzberg, T. R. (2003). Diversity and creativity in work group: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. In P. B. Paulus, & B. A. Nijstad, (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 32-62). Oxford University Press.
- Nemeth, C. J., Brown, K. S., & Rogers, J. (2001). Devil’s advocate versus authentic dissent: Stimulating quantity and quality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 707-720. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.58
- Nemeth, C. J. & Nemeth-Brown, (2003). Better than individual? The potential benefit of dissent and diversity for group creativity. In P. B. Paulus, & B. A. Nijstad, (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 63-84). Oxford University Press.
- Nijstad, B. A., Dieha, M., & Stroebe, W. (2003). Cognitive stimulation and interference in idea-generating groups. In P. B. Paulus, & B. A. Nijstad, (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 137-159). Oxford University Press.
- Nunez-Oveido, M. C., Clement, J., & Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (2008). Developing complex mental modes in biology through model evolution. In J. J. Clement, & M. A. Rea-Ramirez (Eds.), Model based learning and instruction in science (pp. 173-193). Netherlands: Springer.
- Pakeltiene, R. & Ragauskaite, A. (2017). Creative synergy as a potential factor for the development of social innovations. Research for Rural Development, 2, 174-181.
- Palsdottir, G. & Sriraman, B. (2017). Teacher's views on modeling as a creative mathematical activity. In R. Leikin, & B. Sriraman, (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness (pp. 47-55). Switzerland: Springer.
- Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(2), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00013
- Paulus, P. B. & Brown, V. R. (2003). Enhancing ideatioanl creativity in Groups. In P. B. Paulus, & B. A. Nijstad, (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 110-136). Oxford University Press.
- Paulus, P. B. & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativiry. In P. B. Paulus, & B. A. Nijstad, (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 3-11). Oxford University Press.
- Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Group creativity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed), Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation account. (pp. 231-248). New York : Oxford University Press.
- Sheffield, L. J. (2006). Developing mathematical promise and creativity. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800801915731
- Sriraman, B. (2005). Are mathematical giftedness and mathematical creativity synonyms? A theoretical analysis of constructs. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-389
- Suh, J. M., Matson, K., & Seshaiyer, P. (2017). Engaging elementary students in the creative process of mathematizing their world through mathematical modeling. Education Sciences, 7(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020062
- Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2002). Everyday knowledge and mathematical modeling of school word problems. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 257-276). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Vorholter, K. (2017). Conceptualization and measuring of metacognitive modelling competencies: Empirical verification of theoretical assumption. ZDM, 50(1-2), 343-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0909-x
- Vorholter, K., Kruger, A., & Wendt, L. (2017). Metacognitive modelling competencies in small groups. In T. Dooley, & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth congress of the european society for research in mathematics education. Dublin, Ireland: DCU Institute of Education and ERME.
- Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517
- Zhou, C. & Luo, L. (2012). Group creativity in learning context: Understanding in a social-cultural framework and methodology. Creative Education, 3(4), 392-399. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.34062