DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Ride Quality Enhancement of the High-speed Electric Multiple Unit

동력분산형 고속열차의 승차감 개선에 관한 연구

  • Jeon, Chang-Sung (High-speed Railroad Systems Research Team, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Soo (High-speed Railroad Systems Research Team, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Seog-Won (High-speed Railroad Systems Research Team, Korea Railroad Research Institute)
  • 전창성 (한국철도기술연구원 고속철도연구팀) ;
  • 김상수 (한국철도기술연구원 고속철도연구팀) ;
  • 김석원 (한국철도기술연구원 고속철도연구팀)
  • Received : 2018.09.27
  • Accepted : 2018.11.02
  • Published : 2018.11.30

Abstract

This study was carried out to improve the ride quality of high-speed electric multiple unit. Through dynamic analysis of the HEMU-430X, the range of the equivalent conicity with a critical speed of 300 km/h was between 0.05 and 0.25. The initial adopted wheel profile of HEMU-430X was S1002. The equivalent conicity of S1002 with the mileage of more than 40,000 km was about 0.033 and it was confirmed that XP55 is more suitable for stable operation because XP55 has the equivalent conicity of over 0.061. In order to improve ride quality of high-speed electric multiple unit, the change of installation angle of the yaw damper was suggested from $7.35^{\circ}$ to $0^{\circ}$. From sensitivity analysis and optimization, the air spring lateral and vertical stiffness was suggested to be reduced by 30% and the secondary vertical and lateral damper damping coefficient was increased by 50%. By applying this, it was expected that the car body acceleration could be improved by about 20% on average. The HEMU-430X's yaw damper installation angle was changed to $0^{\circ}$ and the damping coefficient of the lateral damper was increased by 30%. When the test run was carried out at the speed of 300 km/h on the Kyungbu high-speed line, the vehicle lateral acceleration had improved by 34.3%. The effect of additional improvement measures proposed in this paper will be tested in the on track test. The riding quality improvement process used in this study can be used to solve ride quality problems that can occur in commercial operation of high-speed electric multiple unit in the future.

본 연구는 동력분산형 고속열차의 승차감을 개선하기 위하여 진행되었다. 동력분산형 고속열차 시제차량의 동역학 해석을 통해 300km/h이상의 임계속도를 갖는 등가 답면구배의 범위는 0.05에서 0.25사이임을 확인하였다. 초기에 적용된 차륜 프로파일 S1002는 4만km이상의 누적주행거리에도 불구하고 등가 답면구배는 0.033 정도였고, 안정적인 운행을 위해서는 등가 답면구배가 0.061이 넘는 XP55가 더 적합함을 확인하였다. 동력분산형 고속열차의 승차감을 개선하기 위한 방안으로 요댐퍼의 설치 각도를 $7.35^{\circ}$에서 $0^{\circ}$로 변경하고, 민감도 분석과 최적화를 통해 도출된 공기스프링 횡 및 상하방향 강성 30% 감소, 2차 수직댐퍼 및 횡댐퍼 댐핑계수를 50% 증가시키는 방안을 제안하였다. 이를 적용하면 차체 가속도를 평균 20%정도 개선시킬 수 있을 것으로 예상되었다. 도출된 승차감 개선 방법의 일부인 요댐퍼 설치각도를 $0^{\circ}$로 변경하고 횡댐퍼의 댐핑계수를 30% 증가시킨 후 경부고속선에서 300km/h 속도로 시운전을 진행하였을 때, 차체 횡가속도는 평균 34.3% 개선되었고, 본 연구에서 제안된 추가적인 개선 방안은 향후 시운전 시험 시에 적용될 예정이다. 본 연구에서 사용된 승차감 개선 프로세스는 향후 동력분산형 고속열차의 상업 운행 시에 발생할 수 있는 승차감 관련 문제 해결에 사용될 수 있다.

Keywords

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n11_561_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. HEMU-430X

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n11_561_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Critical speed according to equivalent conicity

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n11_561_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Equivalent conicity with measured wheel profile

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n11_561_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Current yaw damper configuration

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n11_561_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Sensitivity analysis result

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n11_561_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Optimization result

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n11_561_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Yaw damper angle adjustment

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n11_561_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8. Vertical stiffness of air spring

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n11_561_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 9. On track test results

Table 1. Design variables and level

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n11_561_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Acceleration investigation of some cases

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n11_561_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. C.K. Park, S.S. Kim, K.K. Kim et al., "Optimization of Non-linear Characteristics of the secondary dampers for the High Speed Electrical Multiple Train," Proceedings of the Korean Society for Railway Autumn Conference, pp.2568-2572, 2009.
  2. S.G. Baek, R.M. Lee, B.S. Shin et al., "Vibration Reduction of the High-speed EMU for Improvement of Ride Comfort," Proceedings of the Korean Society for Railway Autumn Conference, pp.1435-1440, 2008.
  3. K.S. Sim, T.W. Park, J.H. Lee et al., "An Evaluation on Derailment according to Running Safety of Next-Generation High Speed Train (HEMU-430X)," Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol.15, No.4, pp.343-351, 2012. https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2012.15.4.343
  4. UIC, "Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behaviour - Safety - Track fatigue - Ride quality," UIC CODE 518 OR, 2009.
  5. C.S. Jeon, Y.G. Kim, S.W. Kim et al., "A Study on Tail Vibration Reduction for the Next Generation High Speed EMU," Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol.15, No.6, pp.543-549, 2012. https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2012.15.6.543
  6. Resonate Group Limited. VAMPIRE Pro V6.40 users' manual, 2017.
  7. C.S. Jeon, Y.G. Kim, J.H. Park et al., "A study on the dynamic behavior of the Korean next-generation high-speed train," Proc IMechE Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol.230, No.4, pp.1053-1065, 2015.
  8. EN 14363 : 2005. Railway applications - acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles-testing of running behaviour and stationary tests.
  9. C.S. Jeon, "A Study on the Dynamic Behavior Enhencement of the Korean High Speed Train," Journal of the Korean Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.18, No.10, pp.81-87, 2017.
  10. EN 13715 : 2006. Railway applications - Wheelsets and bogies - Wheels - Tread profile.
  11. C.S. Jeon, "A study on Critical Speed Enhancement of High-speed Train Passenger Car," Journal of the Korean Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.17, No.12, pp.603-610, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.12.603
  12. C.S. Jeon, H.S. Cho, C.S. Park et al., "Critical speed enhancement of a Korean high-speed train through optimization with measured wheel profiles," Proc IMechE Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol.232, No.1, pp.171-181, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409716662091
  13. R. L. Plackett, J. P. Burman, "The Design of Optimum Multifactorial Experiments," Biometrika, Vol.33, No. 4, pp. 305-325, 1946. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/33.4.305
  14. S. H. Park, "Design of Experiments," Minyoung Publishing Co., 2009.
  15. R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1995.
  16. S.S. Rao. Engineering Optimization: Theory and Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1996.