KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Current Status and Facilitation Strategy of BIM for Civil Infrastructure Projects

토목공사의 BIM 현황 및 활성화에 관한 연구

  • 박태순 (한밭대학교 일반대학원 토목공학과) ;
  • 박희성 (국립한밭대학교 건설환경공학과)
  • Received : 2017.11.17
  • Accepted : 2017.12.11
  • Published : 2018.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide baseline on the current status and the activation of BIM in civil engineering which can integrate and manage the information and tasks generated during the life cycle. Hierarchical analysis was conducted to identify the level of BIM application, recognition survey for practitioners, and activation plans. The survey results show similar trends in BIM activation inhibition factor, the need for BIM, the effect of BIM and the future possibility of BIM. The utilization of BIM and the technical training in the civil engineering field were lower than those in the architectural field. The analysis of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is performed to identify the degree of importance in financial, operational, investment, technical, and institutional sections as its activating factors. As a result, the technical factor points the highest degree. Thus, study shows the direction to apply BIM in civil engineering in the future by suggesting an efficient plan.

본 논문은 건설업에서 전 생애주기 동안 생성되는 정보와 업무 등을 통합 및 관리할 수 있는 BIM (Building Information Modeling)에 관해 국내 토목분야에서 BIM기술의 현황과 활성화를 위한 방안의 기초자료 제공을 목적으로 수행하였다. 이를 위해 토목분야와 건축분야의 실무자를 대상으로 국내 건설업의 BIM 적용 현황, 실무자 인식조사, 활성화 방안을 위한 계층 분석을 실시하였다. 설문조사 결과 BIM 활성화 저해요인, 단계별 업무에 따른 BIM의 필요성, BIM 적용 시 효과 등과 향후 BIM의 발전 가능성에 대한 질문들은 비슷한 경향을 나타냈다. 토목분야는 건축분야에 비해 BIM의 활용 현황, 기술 교육 정도 등이 낮은 것으로 나타났다. BIM의 활성화 방안을 위한 AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) 분석 시에는 재무적, 운영적, 투자적, 기술적, 제도적인 부문별로 중요도에 따른 순위 결과 기술적인 부문이 중요하게 나타났다. 본 연구결과는 BIM의 현황 및 활성화를 위한 분석 결과를 기반으로 효율적인 방안을 제시함으로써 향후 토목분야에 BIM 적용 시 기본방향을 위한 연구에 활용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. BuildingSMART, http://www.buildingsmart.or.kr/overview/BIM.aspx (accessed: July 23, 2015) (in Korean).
  2. Choi, J. S., Kim, I. H., Jo, C. W. and Choi, J. H. (2009). "Application status of domestic architectural industry of open BIM and development direction." International Juornal of CAD/CAM, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 355-363 (in Korean).
  3. HOUD (2011). "BIM technology progress: current status and application cases." HOUD Report, No. 26 (in Korean).
  4. Hwang, S. H., Jun, J. P., Seo, J. W. and Hwang, G. W. (2014). "Civil and infra BIM." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol. 15, No. 11, pp. 97-104 (in Korean).
  5. Jeong, Y. S. (1999). "Analytical validation of a CIC framework." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol. 15, No. 11, pp. 97-104 (in Korean).
  6. Ju, K. B. (2013). "BIM in Civil infrastructure sector." KICT Construction Brief (in Korean).
  7. Kang, L. S., Kim, S. G., Kim, H. S. and Moon, H. S. (2011). "BIM application for civil enginerring project in planning and design phases." Journal of KIMBIM, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 26-31 (in Korean).
  8. Lee, S. Y. and Jo, Y. S. (2011). "A study on the application methodology of set-based design approach of outrigger system based on lean process." Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 50-58 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2011.12.4.50
  9. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (2010). "BIM guide for architectural projects" (in Korean).
  10. Public Procurement Survice (2015). "BIM guide for facility projects" (in Korean).
  11. Saaty, T. L. (1980). "Analytic hierarchy process." McGraw-Hill, New York.
  12. Seo, M. B. and Ju, K. B. (2012). "Strategies to revitalize BIM (Building Information Modeling) by the survey questionnaires from design experts in field of civil engineering." International Journal of contents, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 446-457 (in Korean).