KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Review of the Physical Evaluation Factors of the Campustown Project - Focused on Seoul Campustown Project -

캠퍼스타운 조성사업의 물리적 평가요소 검토 - 서울시 캠퍼스타운 조성사업을 중심으로 -

  • 추현수 (홍익대학교 도시계획학과) ;
  • 백태열 (홍익대학교 도시계획학과) ;
  • 강준모 (홍익대학교 도시공학과)
  • Received : 2017.12.08
  • Accepted : 2018.01.09
  • Published : 2018.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify important evaluation criteria that need to be prioritized by developing one for the campustown development project in Seoul. To achieve this, we examined the list of initial ideas for the project and selected the criteria that corresponds to the goal of the project. Moreover, we conducted AHP and preference survey to further refine the evaluation criteria. As a result, improvement of walking space and providing urban regeneration base space were found to be most important; utilizing high density mixed land use was rated as least important. Based on the findings, the proposed evaluation criteria can help the process of the project as guidelines. As initial evidence it can also guide us for a future development direction in between the completion of the first project and the start of the second stage of the project.

본 연구의 목적은 서울시 캠퍼스타운 조성 사업 평가지표를 개발하여 중요도 및 우선순위를 도출하고자 함에 있다. 이에 사업 초기 단계인 캠퍼스타운 조성사업에 대한 내용을 면밀히 검토하고, 캠퍼스타운 조성 사업에 부합하는 평가항목 및 요소를 도출한 후 AHP 및 선호도 조사를 통해 평가지표를 선정하였다. 평가 결과 보행공간 개선 및 도시재생 거점공간 조성이 가장 높게 평가되었으며, 고밀혼합 토지이용이 가장 낮게 평가되었다. 본 연구 결과에서도 알 수 있듯이 평가지표는 캠퍼스타운 조성 사업의 중간단계에서 모니터링 자료로 활용하고, 1단계 사업 완료 후 다음 2단계 사업 추진 시 개발방향을 설정하는데 기초연구로서 활용할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, C. I and Jin, S. H. (2007). "Civil Servants' Perception about revitalization of urban center in small city -In case of Daesan town." Korea Planners Association, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 95-107 (in Korean).
  2. Hyoung, S. Y. and Min, H. J. (2005). "Evaluation on urban regeneration of big cities from the private and governmental point of view." Urban Administration, Korean Society of Urban Administration, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 105-129 (in Korean).
  3. Kim, G. Y. (2015). An analytical study on the urban regeneration in Changwon and proposals to improve the projects, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Gyeongsang (in Korean).
  4. Lee, I. H and Lee, J. H. (2011). "A study on the urban planning elements for sustainable urban regeneration." Urban Design, Urban Design Institute of Korea, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 101-114 (in Korean).
  5. Moon, S. B. (2011). A study on the materialization of business links of urban regeneration using preference analysis, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Dongsin (in Korean).
  6. Park, D. G. (2009). Assessment of the urban center regeneration project based on the analysis of planning factors, Master Thesis, University of Hanyang (in Korean).
  7. Sang, M. G. (2010). Toward a collaborative implementation model for urban regeneration in Seoul : With special reference to Se-Woon District, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Seoul (in Korean).
  8. Seoul (2016). Seoul city campus town development project press briefing materials (in Korean).
  9. Yoon, Y. G. (2011). A study on development of evaluation index of urban regeneration project, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kyungil (in Korean).