Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회논문집)

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Simplified Assessment Method and Application for Consideration of Survivability in Spatial Layout Design at the Early Design Stage of Naval Vessels

함정 초기 설계 단계에서 레이아웃 설계 시 생존성을 고려하기 위한 간이 평가 방법과 애플리케이션

  • Jung, Jin-Uk (Republic of Korea Navy Headquarters) ;
  • Jeong, Yong-Kuk (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ju, SuHeon (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Shin, Jong Gye (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, JongChul (6th R&D Institute, Agency of Defense Development)
  • 정진욱 (대한민국 해군 해군본부) ;
  • 정용국 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 주수헌 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 신종계 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 김종철 (국방과학연구소 제6본부)
  • Received : 2017.08.29
  • Accepted : 2017.11.24
  • Published : 2018.02.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Survivability of naval vessels is defined as the ability to perform functions and missions in a combat environment. Survivability has close relationship with the spatial layout of naval vessels. In order to maximize survivability, it must be considered from the early stage of design. However the existing concept of survivability was intended to be applied to unit vessels. So it was not suitable for assessment of spatial layout results at the early stage of design. In this paper, a simplified assessment method which can evaluate the spatial layout considering the survivability in the early stage of design has been proposed. For this, assessment layers were defined on survivability components such as susceptibility, vulnerability, and recoverability. Assessment layers of each component were overlapped to deduce a survivability layer of spatial layout alternatives. In addition, the proposed method and optimization algorithm were used to derive optimal spatial layout alternatives considering survivability.

Keywords

References

  1. Ball, R.E. & Calvano, C.N., 1994. Establishing the fundamentals of a surface ship survivability design discipline, Naval Engineers Journal, 106(1), pp.71-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1994.tb02798.x
  2. Carlson, C.M. & Fireman, H., 1987. General arrangement design computer system and methodology. Journal of Naval Engineers, 99(3), pp.261-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1987.tb02137.x
  3. Hwang, I.H. Shin, J.H. Kim, Y.M. & Shin, J.G., 2014. Spatial arrangement of naval ships considering functions and relationships between compartments. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 51(5), pp.388-395. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2014.51.5.388
  4. Kim, K.S. & Lee, J.H., 2012. Simplified vulnerability assessment procedure for a warship based on the vulnerable area approach. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26(7), pp.2171-2181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0539-8
  5. Kim, K.S. & Lee, J.H., 2014. Integrated survivability assessment given multiple penetration hits. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 28(1), pp.69-76. https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2014.28.1.069
  6. Kim, Y.M. Jeong, Y.K. Ju, S.H. Shin, J.G. & Shin, J.H., 2014. Development of a naval vessel compartment arrangement application using differential evolution algorithm. Transactions of the Society of CAD/CAM Engineers, 19(4), pp.410-422. https://doi.org/10.7315/CADCAM.2014.410
  7. Nick, E.K., 2008. Fuzzy optimal allocation and arrangement of spaces in naval surface ship design. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Michigan.
  8. Onwubolu, G.C. & Davendra, D., 2009. Differential evolution: A handbook for global permutation-based combinatorial optimization, Springer: Germany.
  9. Piperakis, A.S., 2013. An integrated approach to naval ship survivability in preliminary ship design. Ph.D. Thesis. University College London.
  10. Price, K. Storn, R.M. & Lampinen, J.A., 2006. Differential evolution: a practical approach to global optimization. Springer Science & Business Media: Germany.
  11. Reese, R.M. Calvano, C.N. & Hopkins, T.M., 1998. Operationally oriented vulnerability requirements in the ship design process. Naval Engineers Journal, 110(1), pp.19-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1998.tb02383.x
  12. Shin, J.H., 2013. A study on the spatial arrangement of naval ships considering survivability. Master's Thesis. Seoul National University.
  13. Storn, R. & Price, K., 1997. Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11(4), pp.341-359. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328
  14. Tibbitts, B. & Keane, R.G., 1999. Acquisition reform: It all starts with design. Naval Engineers Journal, 111(1), pp.39-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1999.tb01217.x