Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics (한국항공운항학회지)

The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics (한국항공운항학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Noise Reduction Policy in Medium-sized Airports

중형 규모 공항의 소음저감 정책 분석

  • 김영록 (한서대학교 항공운항관리학과) ;
  • 임재환 (경희대학교 경제학과) ;
  • 최연철 (한서대학교 항공정보산업대학원) ;
  • 송기한 (한국교통연구원 공항.소음분석센터) ;
  • 신홍우 (한국교통연구원 공항.소음분석센터)
  • Received : 2018.09.04
  • Accepted : 2018.11.06
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The development in air transport increases noise around the airport. In order to reduce the noise around the airport, International Civil Aviation Organization has made a lot of effort since the 1970s and Many countries, including South Korea, are implementing many noise reduction policies. This paper investigates those noise reduction policies of medium-sized airports with similar frequency to Gimpo, Jeju and Gimhae airports in South Korea and compares eleven airports in Europe, eleven airports in Asia and five airports in America, including Oceania. According to the research, European countries developed and applied the navigation procedure to avoid the noise area according to the characteristics of the airport. In Asia, there are not as many domestic noise reduction policies. In case of the United States, it provides information only on noise-sensitive areas around airports. After having investigated various policies, this research has examined the noise reduction policy of South Korea. It is concluded that new navigation procedures which reduce noise should be developed.

Keywords

Table 1. Noise Reduction Policies at Airports in South Korea

HHOHB8_2018_v26n4_155_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Airports similar to Gimpo Airport

HHOHB8_2018_v26n4_155_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Airports similar to Jeju Airport

HHOHB8_2018_v26n4_155_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Airports similar to Gimhae Airport in the number of movements

HHOHB8_2018_v26n4_155_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Noise Reduction Policy

HHOHB8_2018_v26n4_155_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Noise reduction policy in European countries [13][14][15][17][21][22][23][3][31]

HHOHB8_2018_v26n4_155_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Noise reduction policy in Asia [10][11][12][16][18][19][27][32][33]

HHOHB8_2018_v26n4_155_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Noise reduction policy in Oceania and America[26][28][20][29]

HHOHB8_2018_v26n4_155_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Result of noise reduction policy analysis

HHOHB8_2018_v26n4_155_t0009.png 이미지

References

  1. The Korea Transport Institute. A Study on the Establishment of Noise Abatement Procedures. 2006. pp, 188-205.
  2. Woo, J. h. A Study on the Effectiveness of the Measurement Points and Correlation of Aircraft Noise Assessment Units. 2014.
  3. Park, H. K. A Study on Automatic Measurement Netting for Airplane Noise Monitoring. 2007.
  4. Kim, Y. R. Choi, Y. C. A Study on the Maximum Noise Level of Domestic Airport, The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics 2016 Fall Conference :50-53. 2016.
  5. the Korea Transport Institute. Study on Resetting Noise Standard of NADP at Gimpo International Airport : 2016. 137-180.
  6. Lee, J. H. A Study on Evaluation of Aircraft Noise around Airport using Flight Path Data. 2010.
  7. Kim, Y. R. Choi, Y. C. Choi, J. Y. Study on Noise Characteristics of Airport, International Journal of Energy, Information and Communications, 9(3): 2018. 7-12.
  8. Woo, J. H. Kim, H. S. Son, J. W. Park, S. K. 2018. A study on the new proposal of the compensation criteria for noise pollution areas in the vicinity of the airports, The Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering 2018 Spring Conference : 113-113
  9. http://www.airportnoise.kr/noise
  10. AIP Republic of Korea RKPC AD 2
  11. Republic of Korea RKSS AD 2
  12. Republic of Korea RKPK AD 2
  13. AIP FRANCE AD-2 LFMN
  14. LPPT AD 2 AIP PORTUGAL
  15. UNITED KINGDOM AIP AD 2 EGSS
  16. India AIP AD 2 VOBG
  17. LUFTFAHRTHANDBUCH DEUTSCHLAND AIP GERMANY AD 2 EDDT
  18. AIP Japan FUKUOKA Civil Aviation Bureau, Japan RJFF AD 2
  19. AIP UNITED ARAB EMIRATES AD 2 OMAA
  20. AIP BRASIL AD 0.6
  21. LUFTFAHRTHANDBUCH DEUTSCHLAND AIP GERMANY AD 2 EDDH
  22. AIP Italia AD 2 LIMC 1
  23. AIP SUOMI / FINLAND EFHK AD 2.1 - 27
  24. AIP Japan NAHA ROAH AD 2
  25. AIP Japan OSAKA INTL RJOO AD 2
  26. AIP New Zealand NZAA AD 2
  27. AIP Japan NAGOYA RJNA AD 2
  28. AIP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  29. UNITED KINGDOM AIP AD 2.EGPF
  30. AIP FRANCE AD-2.LFLL
  31. AIP TURKEYAD 2 LTAC-14
  32. AIP OMAN AD 2 OOMS
  33. AIP BAHRAIN FIR AD 2 OBBI

Cited by

  1. Forecasting Spare Parts Demand of Military Aircraft: Comparisons of Data Mining Techniques and Managerial Features from the Case of South Korea vol.12, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156045