DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ground Subsidence Risk Ratings for Practitioners to predict Ground Collapse during Excavation (GSRp)

  • Ihm, Myeong Hyeok (Department of Construction Safety and Disaster Prevention Engineering, Daejeon University)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.20
  • 심사 : 2018.11.05
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31

초록

In the field of excavation, it is important to recognize and analyze the factors that cause the ground collapse in order to predict and cope with the ground subsidence. However, it is difficult for field engineers to predict ground collapse due to insufficient knowledge of ground subsidence influence factors. Although there are many cases and studies related to the ground subsidence, there is no manual to help practitioners. In this study, we present the criteria for describing and quantifying the influential factors to help the practitioners understand the existing ground collapse cases and classification of the ground subsidence factors revealed through the research. This study aims to improve the understanding of the factors affecting the ground collapse and to provide a GSRp for the ground subsidence risk assessment which can be applied quickly in the field.

키워드

Table 1. Factors of ground subsidence risk due to geotechnical characteristics during preexcavation.

E1GMBY_2018_v6n4_255_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Ground subsidence influence factors and rating criteria (Ihm, 2018).

E1GMBY_2018_v6n4_255_t0002.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Finno, R. J., Bryson, S., & Michele, C. (2002). Performance of a stiff support system in soft clay (Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering). 128(8), 660-671. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:8(660)
  2. Gibbs, H. J., & Holtz, W. G. (1957). Research on determining the density of sands by spoon penetration testing (4th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering). London, Vol. 1, pp. 35-39.
  3. Hu, Z. F., Yue, Z. Q., Zhou, J., & Tham, L. G. (2003). Design and construction of a deep excavation in soft soils adjacent to the Shanghai metro tunnels (Canadian Geotechnical Journal). 40(5), 933-948. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-041
  4. Ihm, M. H. (2018). Proposal of ground subsidence risk rating (GSR) due to excavation in order to prediction of ground subsidence, ICGCE 2018, Phuket, Thaland.
  5. Ihm, M. H. (2018). Proposal of Ground Subsidence Risk Rating (GSR) Predict to Sink-Hole and Ground Subsidence, Korean Geotechnical Society, 2018 Spring Conference, (in Korean with English Abstract).
  6. Park, J. Y., Jang, E., Kim, H. J., & Ihm, M. H. (2017). Classification of ground subsidence factors for prediction of ground subsidence risk (GSR) (The Journal of Engineering Geology). 27(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.9720/kseg.2017.2.153
  7. Powers, J. P. (1992). Construction dewatering, new methods and applications, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 528p.
  8. Seong, J. H., & Shin C. K. (2008). Analysis of case study for ground subsidence (The Journal of Facility Safety). 31, 70-80.
  9. Singh, K. B. (2007). Pot-hole subsidence in son-Mahanadi master coal basin. (Engineering Geology). 89(1), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.09.011
  10. Tan, Y. & Li, M. (2011). Measured performance of a 26m deep top-down excavation in downtown Shanghai (Canadian Geotechnical Journal). 48(5), 704-719. https://doi.org/10.1139/t10-100
  11. Thinh, H. P., & Ludmila, A. (2015). Prediction maps of land subsidence caused by groundwater exploitation in Hanoi (Vietnam, Resource Efficient Technologies). 1, 80-89.
  12. Vallejo, L. I. G. & Ferrer, M. (2011). Geological engineering, CRC Press, Balkema Book, 678p.
  13. Yoon, M. S. & Ahn, D. W. (2011). Estimation of vaccum pressure and prediction of settlement at optimum stage of ground with individual vaccum pressure method (Journal of Land Housing and Urban Affairs). 2(2), 163-170. (in Korean with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.5804/LHIJ.2011.2.2.163