DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of gene flow from GM to non-GM soybeans by the size of the pollen donor

  • Lee, Bumkyu (Department of Environment Science & Biotechnology, Jeonju University) ;
  • Oh, Sung-Dug (Biosafety Division, National Academy of Agricultural Sciences) ;
  • Chang, Ancheol (Biosafety Division, National Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
  • Received : 2018.08.14
  • Accepted : 2018.09.27
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

The use of genetically modified (GM) crops has increased continuously over the world, and concerns about the potential risks of GM crops have also risen. Although, until now, GM crops have not been cultivated commercially in Korea, it is necessary to develop technology for the safe evaluation of GM crops. In this study, we investigated the influence of gene flow from GM to non-GM soybeans by the size of the pollen donor. In the experimental design, GM soybeans were placed in the center as a pollen donor and non-GM soybeans were placed in four directions as the pollen receivers. Three sizes of pollen donor were designed as $90cm{\times}90cm$, $180cm{\times}180cm$, and $360cm{\times}360cm$. A total 22,719 seeds were collected from non-GM soybeans, and 14 hybrids were finally obtained through herbicide resistance screening and PCR analysis. The highest hybridization rate was 0.78% at a distance of 15 cm from a $360cm{\times}360cm$ GM pollen donor, and the farthest distance of hybridization was 180 cm from a GM pollen donor which was $360cm{\times}360cm$ in size. Ten hybrids were found among the 14 hybrids at the $360cm{\times}360cm$ pollen donor size, 3 hybrids at $180cm{\times}180cm$, 1 hybrid at $90cm{\times}90cm$. From these results, it could be concluded that with the larger pollen donor size, more hybridization occurred in soybeans.

Keywords

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_591_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Diagrammatic representation of experimental design for gene fow. Genetically modifed (GM) soybeans were planted in center (black circle) as pollen source. non-GM soybeans (white circle) were planted in four directions beside GM soybeans.

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_591_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. The experimental design of the field trial. Genetically modified (GM) soybeans were planted in center (black rectangles) as pollen source. non-GM soybeans were planted in four directions beside GM soybeans. The size of GM pollen source was 90 cm × 90 cm (A), 180 cm × 180 cm (B), and 360 cm × 360 cm (C). (D) is photograph of the experimental field trial.

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_591_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. The example of sampling point for gene flow. Gray squares indicate the soybeans from which fruits were collected for screening hybrids.

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_591_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Part of hybrid detection by PCR analysis. bar gene was used to detect hybrid and lectin gene used as control gene. GM, genetically modifed. * means non-specifc band.

Table 1. Frequency of out-crossing rates evaluated from surviving progeny in East and West sites.

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_591_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Frequency of out-crossing rates evaluated from surviving progeny in North and South sites.

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_591_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. Ahrent DK, Caviness CE. 1994. Natural cross-pollinaion of twelve soybean cultivars in Arkansas. Crop Science 34:376-378. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400020013x
  2. Al-Ahmad H, Gressel J. 2006. Mitigation using tandem construct containing a selectively unfit gene precludes establishment of Brassica napus transgenes in hybrids and backcrosses with weedy Brassica rapa. Plant Biotech 4:23-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00153.x
  3. Bae HK, Oo MM, Jeon JE, Tien DN, Oh SA, Oh SD, Kweon SH, Eun MY, Park SK. 2013. Evaluation of gene flow from GM to Non-GM rice. Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 1:162-170. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2013.1.2.162
  4. Baek HJ, Sohn SI, Cho MR, Lee GS, Oh YJ, Park JS, Lee KJ, Oh SD, Suh SC, Ryu TH. 2010. Development of protocol for analyzing pollinator insect-mediated gene transfer from gm crop. Korean Journal of International Agriculture 22:293-297. [in Korean]
  5. Baek HJ, Won SY, Kim JK, Sohn SI, Lee K, Cho MR, Song JK, Yoon MS, Lee J, Jin YM, Ryu TH. 2008. Study on the gene introgression from GM Chinese cabbage to major crops in Cruciferae. Korean Journal of International Agriculure 20:124-129. [in Korean]
  6. Brookes G, Barfoot P. 2006. Global impact of biotech crops: Socio-economic and environmental effects in the first ten years of commercial use. AgBioForum 9:139-151.
  7. Chiang YC, Kiang YT. 1987. Geometric position of genotypes, honeybee foraging patterns and outcrossing in soybean. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica 28:1-11.
  8. Conner AJ, Glare TR, Nap JP. 2003. The release of genetically modified crops into the environment; Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. Plant Journal 33:19-46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7412.2002.001607.x
  9. Ellstrand NC. 1992. Gene flow by pollen: Implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 63:77-86. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545517
  10. Han SM, Lee B, Won OJ, Hwang KS, Suh SJ, Kim CG, Park KW. 2015. Gene flow from herbicide resistant genetically modified rice to conventional rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Journal of Ecology and Environment 38:397-403. https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.042
  11. James C. 2018. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2017, BRIEF 53. Accessed in http://www.isaaa.org on 1 July 2018.
  12. KBCH (Korea Biosafety Clearing House). 2018. Stats of GM crops in Korea. Accessed in http://www.biosafety.or.kr on 23 July 2018.
  13. Kim CG, Lee B, Kim DI, Park JE, Kim HJ, Park KW, Yi H, Jeong SC, Yoon WK, Harn CH, Kim HM. 2008. Detection of gene flow from GM to non-GM watermelon in a field trial. Journal of Plant Biology 51:74-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030744
  14. Kim CG, Kim DI, Kim HJ, Park JY, Lee B, Park KW, Jeong SC, Cho KH, An JH, Cho KH, Kim YS, Kim HM. 2009a. Assessment of gene flow from genetically modified anthracnose-resistant chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to a conventional crop. Journal of Plant Biology 52:251-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-009-9025-y
  15. Kim CG, Park KW, Lee B, Kim DI, Park JY, Kim HJ, Park JE, An JH, Cho KH, Jeong SC, Choi KH, Harn JH, Kim HM. 2009b. Gene flow from genetically modified to conventional chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant Science 176:406-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.12.012
  16. Kim YJ, Nam KH, Pack IS, Park JH, Jeong SC, Harn CH, Kim CG. 2014. Gene flow from GM cabbage to Non-GM control. CNU Journal of Agricultural Science 41:157-161. [in Korean]
  17. Lee B, Kim CG, Park JY, Yi H, Park KW, Jeong SC, Yoon WK, An JH, Cho KH, Kim HM. 2007a. Survey of herbicide resistant oilseed rapes around the basin of rivers in Incheon harbor area. Korean Journal of Weed Science 27:29-35. [in Korean]
  18. Lee SY, Kim MS, Kim HJ, Ahn JH, Baek SH, Shin WC, Kim HS. 2007b. Pollen-mediated gene flow between glufosinate ammonium-tolerant GM and Non-GM rice. Journal of Plant Biotechnology 34:47-53. https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2007.34.1.047
  19. Lee B, Kim JH, Sohn SI, Kweon SJ, Chung YS, Lee SM. 2015. Influence of insect pollinators on gene transfer from GM to non-GM soybeans. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 42:159-165. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2015.42.3.159
  20. Lee B, Park KW, Kim CG, Kang HG, Sun HJ, Kown YI, Song IJ, Ryu TH, Lee HY. 2014. Environmental monitoring of herbicide tolerant genetically modified zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica) around confined field trials. Weed and Turfgrass Science 3:305-311 [in Korean]. https://doi.org/10.5660/WTS.2014.3.4.305
  21. Lee B, Suh S. 2011. A study on the trends and biosafety assessment of genetically modified crops. Research of Environmental Law 33:1-25. [in Korean]
  22. Lee HS, Yi GH, Kim KM. 2012. Comparison of weed characteristics and possibility of gene flow in GM rice. Korean Journal of Weed Science 32:10-16. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5660/KJWS.2012.32.1.10
  23. Lee IY, Park JE, Moon BC, Suh SC, Shin KS, Woo MO, Kweon SJ. 2009a. Possibility of Gene flow and unintended escape from leaf-folder (Cnaphalocrocis medinalis) resistant rice. Korean Journal of Weed Science 29:46-55. [in Korean]
  24. Lee YH, Kim KS, Jang YS, Cho HJ, Bang JK, Suh SJ. 2009b. Pollen-mediated gene flow from glufosinate resistant transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) into its wild relatives. Korean Journal of International Agriculture 21:193-198.
  25. Levin DA. 1981. Dispersal versus gene flow in plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68:233-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2398797
  26. Nakayama Y, Yamaguchi H. 2002, Natural hybridization in wild soybean (Glycine max ssp. soja) by pollen flow from cultivated soybean (Glycine max ssp. max) in a designed population. Weed Biology and Management 2:25-30. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-6664.2002.00043.x
  27. Oh SD, Lim MH, Ryu TH, Shon SI, Park SK, Lee K. 2014. Assessment of gene flow in disease resistant (OsCK1) genetically modified rice. Korean Journal of Breeding Science 46:44-51. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2014.46.1.044
  28. Oh SD, Yun DW, Shon SI, Park SK, Chang AC. 2017. Assessment of gene flow from insect-resistant genetically modified rice (Agb0101) to non-GM rice. Korean Journal of Breeding Science 49:180-189. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2017.49.3.180
  29. Owen MDK. 2000. Current use of transgenic herbicide-resistant soybean and corn in the USA. Crop Protection. 19:765-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00102-2
  30. Ray JD, Kilen TC, Abel CA, Paris RL. 2003. Soybean natural cross-pollination rates under field conditions. Environmental Biosafety Research 2:133-138. https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2003005
  31. Warwick SI, Beckie HJ, Hall LM. 2009. Gene flow, invasiveness, and ecological impact of genetically modified crops. The Year in Evolutionary Biology 2009: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1168:72-99.
  32. Yoshimura Y, Matsuo K, Yasuda K. 2006. Gene flow from GM glyphosate-tolerant to conventional soybeans under field conditions in Japan. Environmental Biosafety Research 5:169-173. https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007003