DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

PAUT-based defect detection method for submarine pressure hulls

  • Jung, Min-jae (Department of Naval Vessel Service, Korean Register) ;
  • Park, Byeong-cheol (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Bae, Jeong-hoon (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Shin, Sung-chul (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2016.12.08
  • Accepted : 2017.06.08
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

A submarine has a pressure hull that can withstand high hydraulic pressure and therefore, requires the use of highly advanced shipbuilding technology. When producing a pressure hull, periodic inspection, repair, and maintenance are conducted to maintain its soundness. Of the maintenance methods, Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) is the most effective, because it does not damage the target but sustains its original form and function while inspecting internal and external defects. The NDT process to detect defects in the welded parts of the submarine is applied through Magnetic particle Testing (MT) to detect surface defects and Ultrasonic Testing (UT) and Radiography Testing (RT) to detect internal defects. In comparison with RT, UT encounters difficulties in distinguishing the types of defects, can yield different results depending on the skills of the inspector, and stores no inspection record. At the same time, the use of RT gives rise to issues related to worker safety due to radiation exposure. RT is also difficult to apply from the perspectives of the manufacturing of the submarine and economic feasibility. Therefore, in this study, the Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT) method was applied to propose an inspection method that can address the above disadvantages by designing a probe to enhance the precision of detection of hull defects and the reliability of calculations of defect size.

Keywords

References

  1. ASNT, 1989. Nondestructive Testing Handbook (Magnetic Particle Testing). Columbus, USA.
  2. BV, 2009. Rules for Classification Naval Submarines, Part C Pressure Hull and Structures. Paris, France.
  3. Cliffsnotes, 1918. Wave Optics. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/physics/light/wave-optics.
  4. DNV-GL, 2015. DNV GL Rules for Classification: Naval Vessels (RU-NAVAL). Report No. DNV-GL-RU-NAVAL. Det Norske Veritas, Oslo, Norway.
  5. HRDKOREA, 2015. Nondestructive Inspection II. Ulsan, Korea.
  6. Jo, J.B., Jung, K.S., Jang, Y.S., Hur, S.S., 2014. Phased array ultrasonic examination in lieu of radiography to comply with the new nuclear safety law. Int. J. Steel Struct. 26 (5), 57-60.
  7. Kim, Y.S., 2007. A Study on Flaw Evaluation for Turbine Disk Rim Using Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination. Master's thesis. Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.
  8. KSNT, 2013. Phased Array Ultrasonic Technology Application, Yongsan, Seoul, Korea
  9. Lee, J.K., 2014. Technology Applications of Advanced Phased Array Ultrasonic, Heavy and Chemical Facilities Safety Inspection Center. Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
  10. NAVSEA, 1997. Requirements for Fabrication, Welding, and Inspection of Submarine Structure. Report No. T9074-AD-GIB-010/16881997. Commander Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington D.C., USA.
  11. Olympus NDT, 2004. Technology Applications of Advanced Phased Array Ultrasonic. Waltham, USA.
  12. Sehwa, 2001. Unabridged Dictionary on Chemistry. Paju, Korea.
  13. Yule, Peter, Woolner, Derek, 2008. The collins class submarine story - steel, spies and spin. North. Mar. 18 (2), 150-151.

Cited by

  1. Inspection of plate weldments through an interposed layer of viscoelastic material using an elastic-electromagnetic scanning method vol.145, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5111136
  2. Measurement of Thinned Water-Cooled Wall in a Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler Using Ultrasonic and Magnetic Methods vol.11, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062498
  3. Autonomous Underwater Vehicles and Field of View in Underwater Operations vol.9, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9030277