DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Groundwater pollution risk mapping using modified DRASTIC model in parts of Hail region of Saudi Arabia

  • Ahmed, Izrar (Environment Department, Dubai Municipality) ;
  • Nazzal, Yousef (College of Natural & Health Sciences, Zayed University) ;
  • Zaidi, Faisal (Department of Geology & Geophysics, King Saud University)
  • 투고 : 2017.06.11
  • 심사 : 2017.10.08
  • 발행 : 2018.03.31

초록

The present study deals with the management of groundwater resources of an important agriculture track of north-western part of Saudi Arabia. Due to strategic importance of the area efforts have been made to estimate aquifer proneness to attenuate contamination. This includes determining hydrodynamic behavior of the groundwater system. The important parameters of any vulnerability model are geological formations in the region, depth to water levels, soil, rainfall, topography, vadose zone, the drainage network and hydraulic conductivity, land use, hydrochemical data, water discharge, etc. All these parameters have greater control and helps determining response of groundwater system to a possible contaminant threat. A widely used DRASTIC model helps integrate these data layers to estimate vulnerability indices using GIS environment. DRASTIC parameters were assigned appropriate ratings depending upon existing data range and a constant weight factor. Further, land-use pattern map of study area was integrated with vulnerability map to produce pollution risk map. A comparison of DRASTIC model was done with GOD and AVI vulnerability models. Model validation was done with $NO_3$, $SO_4$ and Cl concentrations. These maps help to assess the zones of potential risk of contamination to the groundwater resources.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Civita M. Vulnerability maps of aquifers subjected to pollution: Theory and practice. Pitagora ditrice: Bologna (In Italian); 1994.
  2. Polemio M, Dragone V, Limoni PP. Monitoring and methods to analyse the groundwater quality degradation risk in coastal karstic aquifers (Apulia Souhern Italy). Environ. Geol. 2008;58:299-312.
  3. Al-Salamah IS, Ghazaw YM, Ghumman AR. Groundwater modeling of Saq Aquifer Buraydah Al Qassim for better water management strategies. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011;173:851-860.
  4. MoWE. Investigations for updating the groundwater mathematical models of the Saq and overlying aquifers. Ministry of Water and Electricity in Saudi Arabia; 2008.
  5. Nazzal Y, Zaidi FK, Ahmed I, et al. The combination of principal component analysis and geostatistics as a technique in the assessment of groundwater hydrochemistry in arid environment: A case study of central Saudi Arabia. Curr. Sci. 2015;108:1138-1145.
  6. El Maghraby MMS, Ahmad KO, El Nasr A, Hamouda MSA. Quality assessment of groundwater at south Al Madinah Al Munawarah area, Saudi Arabia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2013;70: 1525-1538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2239-9
  7. Nazzal Y, Ahmed I, Al Arifi NSN, et al. A pragmatic approach to study the groundwater quality suitability for domestic and agricultural usage, Saq aquifer, northwest of Saudi Arabia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014;186:4655-4667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3728-3
  8. Zaidi FK, Nazzal Y, Ahmed I, et al. Hydrochemical processes governing groundwater quality of sedimentary aquifers in Central Saudi Arabia and its environmental implications. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015;74:1555-1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4150-z
  9. Aller L, Bennet T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ. DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington D.C., EPA/600/2-85/018; 2004.
  10. Civita M, DeMiao M. Assessing and mapping groundwater vulnerability to contamination: The Italian combined approach. Geofísica Internacional 2004;43:513-532.
  11. Foster SSD. Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: van Duijvenbooden W, HG van Waegeningh, eds. TNO committee on hydrological research, The Hague. Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants, Processing and Information. 1987;38:69-86.
  12. Doerfliger N, Zwahlen F. EPIK: A new method for outling of protection areas in karstic environment. In: International symposium on karst waters and environmental impacts; 1997. p. 117-123.
  13. Van Stempvoort D, Evert L, Wassenaar L. Aquifer vulnerability index: A GIS compactable method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Can. Water Resour. J. 1993;18:25-37. https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj1801025
  14. Al Adamat RAN, Foster IDL, Baban SNJ. Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the Basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, Remote sensing and DRASTIC. Appl. Geogr. 2003;23:303-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2003.08.007
  15. Panagopoulos G, Antonakos A, Lambrakis N. Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Hydrogeol. J. 2005;14:894-911.
  16. Rahman A. A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl. Geogr. 2008;28:32-53.
  17. Umar R, Ahmed I, Alam F. Mapping groundwater vulnerable zones using modified DRASTIC approach of an alluvial aquifer in parts of Central Ganga Plain, Western Uttar Pradesh. J. Geol. Soc. India 2009;73:193-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-009-0075-z
  18. Ahmed I, Nazzal Y, Zaidi FK, Al-Arifi NS, Ghrefat H, Naeem M. Hydrogeological vulnerability and pollution risk mapping of the Saq and overlying aquifers using the DRASTIC model and GIS techniques, NW Saudi Arabia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015;74:1303-1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4120-5
  19. Edgell HS. Arabian deserts: Nature, origin and evolution. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006.
  20. Subyani A, Zakai S. Study of recharge outcrop relation of the Wasia Aquifer in Central Saudi Arabia. J. KAU Earth Sci. 1991;4:137-147. https://doi.org/10.4197/Ear.4-1.7
  21. Dincer T, Al Mugren A, Zimmerman V. Study of infiltration and recharge through the sand dunes in arid zones with special reference to the stable isotopes and thermos nuclear tritium. J. Hydrol. 1974;23:79-109.
  22. Hussain MH, Singhal DC, Joshi H, Kumar S. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in a tropical alluvial interfluves, India. Bhu-Jal News J. 2006;21:31-43.

피인용 문헌

  1. Application of multivariate statistics towards the geochemical evaluation of fluoride enrichment in groundwater at Shilabati river bank, West Bengal, India vol.24, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.178
  2. Assessment of radioactivity contents in bedrock groundwater samples from the northern region of Saudi Arabia vol.242, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125181
  3. A GIS-based DRASTIC Model and an Adjusted DRASTIC Model (DRASTICA) for Groundwater Susceptibility Assessment along the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) Route vol.9, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9050332
  4. A Novel Approach to Harmonize Vulnerability Assessment in Carbonate and Detrital Aquifers at Basin Scale vol.12, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12112971
  5. A high-resolution nitrate vulnerability assessment of sandy aquifers (DRASTIC-N) vol.277, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111330
  6. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Structure of plain granular rock mass based on motion sensor and movement evaluation of dancers vol.14, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07936-0
  7. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Rainfall erosion characteristics of loess slope based on big data and internal financial control of enterprises vol.14, pp.16, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07960-0
  8. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Maritime tropical cyclone based on machine learning and marketing strategy in coastal areas vol.14, pp.18, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08067-2
  9. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Detection of PM2.5 in mountain air based on fuzzy multi-attribute and construction of folk sports activities vol.14, pp.18, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08210-z
  10. Groundwater vulnerability assessment using GIS-based DRASTIC model in the upper catchment of Dwarakeshwar river basin, West Bengal, India vol.81, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-10002-3