DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

양송이버섯 재배용 자주식 배지교반기 개발

Development of self-propelled windrow turner for button mushroom compost

  • 박환중 (국립농업과학원 스마트팜개발과) ;
  • 유병기 (국립농업과학원 스마트팜개발과) ;
  • 이성현 (국립농업과학원 스마트팜개발과) ;
  • 이찬중 (국립원예특작과학원 버섯과) ;
  • 김영호 (새터영농조합법인)
  • Park, Hwan-Jung (Smart Farm Development Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Yu, Byeong-Kee (Smart Farm Development Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Hyeon (Smart Farm Development Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Chan-Jung (Mushroom Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Yeong-Ho (Seteo Farming Association Corporation)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.31
  • 심사 : 2018.12.06
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31

초록

유럽에서 양송이 야외발효에 많이 사용하던 윈드로우 터너를 우리나라 실정에 맞게 밀짚대신 볏짚을 사용할 수 있도록 개량 개발하였다. 관행 굴삭기작업과 비교하여 조사한 결과는 다음과 같다. 교반작업 성능은 $81m^3/hr$으로 굴삭기 $28.6m^3/hr$보다 2.8배 높았으며, 재배사 한 동(균상면적 $165m^2$)당 1회 배지교반시간이 46분으로 관행보다 노력을 66% 절감할 수 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한 야외발효 말기 배지더미의 온도분포 조사 결과 배지더미 중앙 아래부분의 온도가 관행보다 $5^{\circ}C$ 이상 높아 호기발효에 유리한 것으로 나타났으며, 부숙도를 추정할 수 있는 회분조사결과 $30.9{\pm}1.1%$로 나타나 관행 $28.4{\pm}1.6%$보다 부숙정도도 높게 나타났다. 버섯의 농가 재배결과 수확량이 시작기의 경우 관행 대조구 대비 22.9% 증수되는 것으로 나타났다.

The windrow turner, widely used for outdoor fermentation of mushrooms in Europe, has been improved by using rice straw instead of wheat straw in accordance with Korea's actual situation. It was compared with conventional excavator work, and the results were as follows. Agitation performance was $81m^3/hr$, which was 2.8 times higher than $28.6m^3/hr$ of excavator. As a result of the temperature distribution in the pile at the end of the fermentation stage, it was found that the temperature at the lower part of the pile was $5^{\circ}C$ higher than that of conventional pile. This was more favorable for aerobic fermentation. Meanwhile, ash ratio of prototype ($30.9{\pm}1.1%$) was higher than that of control $28.4{\pm}1.6%$. In the case of prototype turner agitation, the yield of mushroom cultivation was $880kg/66m^2$, that was 22.9% higher than the conventional control yield of $716kg/66m^2$.

키워드

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Conception of compost turner

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Lug set type of compost turner

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Lug shape of compost turner

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. A schematic diagram of the self-propelled windrow compost turner

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Workability by different type of pickup lug

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. The shape of compost and lug by compost turner at the last turning during outdoor fermentation, it was impossible to work if the pickup-lug linear velocity is more than 2.0 m/s.

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Variation of temperature on different height in compost during initial period(mixing of substrate materials ~ 2nd turning by excavator)

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8. Variation of temperature on different height in compost during latter period(3rd turning?final turning).

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 9. Temperature distribution on compost inside file(half cross section at last stage of outdoor composting process)

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_f0010.png 이미지

Fig 10. Comparison of cultivation characteristics. (left: control, right: turner)

Table 1. Specification of prototype self-propelled windrow compost turner

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Change of composts characteristics during different stages of outdoor composting process

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Yield comparison of different compost processing methods.

BSHGBD_2018_v16n4_250_t0003.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Grivensven LJLD. 1988, The cultivation of Mushrooms, Univ. of Nijmegen. the Netherlands. pp. 31-39, 56-59.
  2. Kim HK, Lee BJ, Kim YG, Yun YU, Yang ES, Kim HG. 2010. Study of the composting method using wheat straw on Agaricus bisporus cultivation. J mushroom sci prod. 8: 33-36.
  3. Kim YG. 2017. Dutch button mushroom industry status, Mushroom 21: 88-105.
  4. Llarena-Hemandez CR, Largeteau ML, Ferrer N, Regnault-Roger C, Savoie JM. 2014. Optimization of the cultivation conditions for mushroom production with European wild strains of Agaricus subrufescens and Brazilian cultivars. J Sci Food Agric 94: 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6200
  5. Lyons GA, McCall RD, Sharma HS. 2000. Physical degradation of wheat staw by the in vessel and windrow methods of mushroom compost production Can J Microbiology 26: 817-825.
  6. MAFRA. 1997. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs 1996. Major statistics of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
  7. MAFRA. 2018. Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs 2017. Major statistics of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
  8. Mark DO, Ton VS. 2016. Mushroom Signals, Phase1, Phase2, Phase3, Roodbont Publishers. B.V., The Netherlands. pp 16-51.
  9. Rural Development Administration. 1996. Quality inspection method and sampling standard of fertilizer, Rural Development Administration Notice No. 1996-6, pp 78-80.
  10. Sharma HSS. 1991. Biochemical and thermal analyses of mushroom compost during preparation. In The Science and Cultivation of Edible Fungi; Maher,M.,Ed., Balkema: Rotterdam. The Netherlands 1:169-179.
  11. Sharma HSS. 1996. Compositional analysis of neutral detergent and acid detergent, lignin and humus fractions of mushroom compost. Thermochimica Acta. 285:211-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6031(96)02954-1