DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Autophagy Induction after Hormone Treatment on Oocytes Maturation of Porcine

  • Kim, Sang Hwan (Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Yoon, Jong Taek (Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University)
  • Received : 2018.11.28
  • Accepted : 2018.12.13
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Here, we evaluated the mode of programmed cell death during porcine oocyte maturation by comparing the two major pathways associated with programmed cell death, apoptosis (type I), and autophagy (type II). We investigated the expression and localization of major genes involved in autophagy and apoptosis at mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, the effect of hormonal stimulation on autophagy and apoptosis was analyzed. We found that the activity of autophagy-associated genes was increased in the cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) following follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) treatment, while the addition of luteinizing hormone (LH) reversed this effect. The expression of proteins associated with autophagy was the highest in FSH-treated COCs. On the other hand, caspase-3 protein level was maximum in COCs cultured with LH. The treatment with rapamycin resulted in the effect similar to that observed with FSH treatment and increased autophagy activity. Thus, hormonal stimulation of pig oocytes resulted in distinct patterns of maturation. The high-quality oocytes majorly relied on the type II pathway (autophagy), while the type I pathway (apoptosis) was more prominent among poor-quality oocytes. Further investigation of this distinction may allow the development of techniques to produce high-quality oocytes in porcine in vitro fertilization.

Keywords

References

  1. Bang S, Shin H, Song H, Suh CS, Lim HJ. 2014. Autophagic activation in vitrified-warmed mouse oocytes. Reproduction. 148:11-19. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-14-0036
  2. Brackett BG, Bousquet D, Boice ML, Donawick WJ, Evans JF, Dressel MA. 1982. Normal development following in vitro fertilization in the cow. Biol Reprod. 27(1):147-158. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod27.1.147
  3. Cohen J, Mandelbaum J, Plachot M. 1980. Maturation and in vitro fertilisation of human oocytes recovered after spontaneous ovulation or after induction of ovulation by use of gonadotrophins (preliminary results) (author's transl). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris).9(5):523-530.
  4. Cuervo AM. 2004. Autophagy: many paths to the same end. Mol Cell Biochem. 263:355-372.
  5. De Felici M, Klinger FG, Farini D, Scaldaferri ML, Iona S & Lobascio M. 2005. Establishment of oocyte population in the fetal ovary: primordial germ cell proliferation and oocyte programmed cell death. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 10 182-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60939-X
  6. Edwards MJ. 1969. Congenital defects in guinea pigs: prenatal retardation of brain growth of guinea pigs following hyperthermia during gestation.Teratology. 2(4):329-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/tera.1420020407
  7. Eppig JJ, O'Brien M, Wigglesworth K. 1996. Mammalian oocyte growth and development in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev. 44(2):260-273. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199606)44:2<260::AID-MRD17>3.0.CO;2-6
  8. Eppig JJ. 1996. Coordination of nuclear and cytoplasmic oocyte maturation in eutherian mammals. Reprod Fertil Dev. 8(4):485-489. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9960485
  9. Eyestone WH1, First NL. 1989. Co-culture of early cattle embryos to the blastocyst stage with oviducal tissue or in conditioned medium. J Reprod Fertil. 85(2):715-720. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0850715
  10. Kikuchi K, Nagai T, Ding J, Yamauchi N, Noguchi J, Izaike Y. 1999. Cytoplasmic maturation for activation of pig follicular oocytes cultured and arrested at metaphase I.J Reprod Fertil. 116(1):143-156. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1160143
  11. Klionsky DJ, Cuervo AM, Dunn WA Jr. 2007. How shall I eat thee? Autophagy. 3:413-416. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.4377
  12. Lobascio AM, Klinger FG, Scaldaferri ML, Farini D and De Felici M. 2007. Analysis of programmed cell death in mouse fetal oocytes. Reproduction. 134 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0141
  13. Manabe N, Goto Y, Matsuda-Minehata F, Inoue N, Maeda A, Sakamaki K, Miyano T. 2004. Regulation mechanism of selective atresia in porcine follicles: regulation of granulosa cell apoptosis during atresia. J Reprod Dev. 50(5): 493-514. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.50.493
  14. Maro B, Verlhac MH. 2002. Polar body formation: new rules for asymmetric divisions. Nat Cell Biol. 4: 281-283. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1202-e281
  15. Morita Y & Tilly JL. 1999. Oocytes apoptosis: like sand through an hourglass. Developmental. Biology. 213: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1999.9344
  16. Singh B, Meng L, Rutledge JM, Armstrong DT. 1997. Effects of epidermal growth factor and follicle-stimulating hormone during in vitro maturation on cytoplasmic maturation of porcine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev. 46(3): 401-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199703)46:3<401::AID-MRD20>3.0.CO;2-#
  17. Song BS, Kim JS, Kim YH, Sim BW, Yoon SB, Cha JJ, Choi SA, Yang HJ, Mun SE, Park YH. 2014. Induction of autophagy during in vitro maturation improves the nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation of porcine oocytes. Reprod Fertil Dev. 26:974-981. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD13106
  18. Tilly JL. 2001. Commuting the death sentence: how oocytes strive to survive. Nature. 2: 838-848.
  19. Wei S, Shen X, Gong Z, Deng Y, Lai L, Liang H. 2017. FSHR and LHR Expression and Signaling as Well as Maturation and Apoptosis of Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes Following Treatment with FSH Receptor Binding Inhibitor in Sheep. Cell Physiol Biochem. 22;43(2):660-669.
  20. Yoshida M, Cran DG, Pursel VG. 1993. Confocal and fluorescence microscopic study using lectins of the distribution of cortical granules during the maturation and fertilization of pig oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev. 36(4):462-468. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080360409