Bibliometric Analysis of Research Productivity in Latent Tuberculosis: Are We Focusing Our Research Efforts on the Right Areas?

References

1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
2. Kawatsu L, Uchimura K, Izumi K, Ohkado A. A systematic review on the prevalence and incidence of latent tuberculosis infection among prison population. Kekkaku 2016;91:457-64.
3. Nasreen S, Shokoohi M, Malvankar-Mehta MS. Prevalence of latent tuberculosis among health care workers in high burden countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0164034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164034
4. Lin PL, Flynn JL. Understanding latent tuberculosis: a moving target. J Immunol 2010;185:15-22. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0903856
5. Lee SH. Tuberculosis infection and latent tuberculosis. Tuberc Respir Dis 2016;79:201-6.
6. Dodd CE, Schlesinger LS. New concepts in understanding latent tuberculosis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2017;30:316-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000367
7. Donoghue HD, Spigelman M, Greenblatt CL, Lev-Maor G, Bar-Gal GK, Matheson C, et al. Tuberculosis: from prehistory to Robert Koch, as revealed by ancient DNA. Lancet Infect Dis 2004;4:584-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01133-8
8. Ortiz-Martinez Y. Assessing worldwide research productivity on tuberculosis over a 40-year period: a bibliometric analysis. Indian J Tuberc 2017;64:235-6.
9. Dutta NK, Karakousis PC. Latent tuberculosis infection: myths, models, and molecular mechanisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2014;78:343-71. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00010-14