Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

How to optimize aesthetic outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction

  • Received : 2017.03.11
  • Accepted : 2017.06.22
  • Published : 2018.01.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The evolution of breast reconstructive surgery keeps pace with the evolution of breast oncologic surgery. The reconstructive choice should always balance the optimal local control of disease and the best cosmetic result, reflecting an informed decision that is shared with the patient, who is always at the center of the decision-making process. Implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy represents a complex choice. In order to obtain optimal results, the following considerations are mandatory: thorough preoperative planning, a complete knowledge of the devices that are used, accurately performed surgery, and appropriate follow-up.

Keywords

References

  1. Halsted WS. I. The results of operations for the cure of cancer of the breast performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June, 1889, to January, 1894. Ann Surg 1894;20:497-555. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-189407000-00075
  2. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1985;312:665-73. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198503143121101
  3. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1989;320:822-8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198903303201302
  4. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med 1981;305:6-11. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198107023050102
  5. della Rovere GQ, Benson JR, Breach N, et al. Oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. London: Taylor & Francis; 2004.
  6. Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4082-8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4225
  7. McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5,865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:2682-90. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0635-x
  8. Bhat S, Orucevic A, Woody C, et al. Evolving trends and influencing factors in mastectomy decisions. Am Surg 2017; 83:233-8.
  9. Catanuto G, Rocco N, Nava MB. Surgical decision making in conservative mastectomies. Gland Surg 2016;5:69-74.
  10. Catanuto G, Pappalardo F, Rocco N, et al. Formal analysis of the surgical pathway and development of a new software tool to assist surgeons in the decision making in primary breast surgery. Breast 2016;29:74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.06.004
  11. Rocco N, Rispoli C, Moja L, et al. Different types of implants for reconstructive breast surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(5):CD010895.
  12. Zhang P, Li CZ, Wu CT, et al. Comparison of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy and mastectomy alone for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017;43:285-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.006
  13. Park SH, Han W, Yoo TK, et al. oncologic safety of immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer patients: a matched case control study. J Breast Cancer 2016;19:68-75. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.1.68
  14. Filiberti A, Rimoldi A, Callegari M, et al. Immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction A psychological answer. Eur J Plast Surg 1990;13:55-8.
  15. Nava MB, Spano A, Cadenelli P, et al. Extra-projected implants as an alternative surgical model for breast reconstruction: implantation strategy and early results. Breast 2008;17: 361-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2008.01.009
  16. Nava MB, Rocco N, Catanuto G, et al. Impact of contra-lateral breast reshaping on mammographic surveillance in women undergoing breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer. Breast 2015;24:434-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2015.03.009
  17. Nava MB, Pennati AE, Lozza L, et al. Outcome of different timings of radiotherapy in implant-based breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:353-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821e6c10
  18. Nava MB, Catanuto G, Pennati AE, et al. Lack of activation of telomere maintenance mechanisms in human adipose stromal cells derived from fatty portion of lipoaspirates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:114e-123e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001008
  19. Nava MB, Catanuto G, Pennati A, et al. Conservative mastectomies. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:681-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9382-4
  20. Nava MB, Rocco N, Catanuto G. Conservative mastectomies: an overview. Gland Surg 2015;4:463-6.
  21. Rocco N, Catanuto G, Nava MB. What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies? Gland Surg 2015;4:506-18.
  22. Nava MB, Cortinovis U, Ottolenghi J, et al. Skin-reducing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:603-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000233024.08392.14
  23. della Rovere GQ, Nava M, Bonomi R, et al. Skin-reducing mastectomy with breast reconstruction and sub-pectoral implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:1303-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.06.032
  24. Nava MB, Ottolenghi J, Pennati A, et al. Skin/nipple sparing mastectomies and implant-based breast reconstruction in patients with large and ptotic breast: oncological and reconstructive results. Breast 2012;21:267-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.01.004
  25. Griffiths M, Chae MP, Rozen WM. Indocyanine green-based fluorescent angiography in breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2016;5:133-49.
  26. Nahabedian MY. Implant-based breast reconstruction: strategies to achieve optimal outcomes and minimize complications. J Surg Oncol 2016;113:895-905. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24210
  27. Dent BL, Small K, Swistel A, et al. Nipple-areolar complex ischemia after nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction: risk factors and the success of conservative treatment. Aesthet Surg J 2014;34:560-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X14528352
  28. Nava M, Quattrone P, Riggio E. Focus on the breast fascial system: a new approach for inframammary fold reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1034-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199809020-00018
  29. Rancati A, Angrigiani C, Hammond D, et al. Preoperative digital mammography imaging in conservative mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Gland Surg 2016;5:9-14.
  30. Zhou Y, Wang J, Li H, et al. Efficacy and safety of cell-assisted lipotransfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:44e-57e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001981
  31. Kronowitz SJ, Mandujano CC, Liu J, et al. Lipofilling of the breast does not increase the risk of recurrence of breast cancer: a matched controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137:385-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000475741.32563.50
  32. Tissiani LA, Alonso N. A prospective and controlled clinical trial on stromal vascular fraction enriched fat grafts in secondary breast reconstruction. Stem Cells Int 2016;2016:2636454.
  33. Rocco N, Gloria A, De Santis R, et al. Improving outcomes in breast reconstruction: from implant-based techniques towards tissue regeneration. Procedia CIRP 2016;49:23-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.07.023

Cited by

  1. Correlation between the inframammary fold and sixth rib: Application to breast reconstruction vol.33, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23407
  2. Current status of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in South Korea vol.64, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2021.64.1.5