DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of insect-resistant genetically modified rice (Bt-9) cultivation on non-target insect diversity

  • Oh, Sung-Dug (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lim, Myung-Ho (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Bumkyu (Department of Environment Science & Biotechnology, Jeonju University) ;
  • Yun, Doh-Won (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Sohn, Soo-In (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Chang, Ancheol (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Park, Soon Ki (School of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Suh, Sang Jae (School of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2017.09.29
  • Accepted : 2018.02.27
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

This study was done to develop environmental risk assessments and a biosafety guide for insect-resistant genetically modified rice at a LMO (Living Modified Organism) isolation field. In the LMO quarantine area of Kyungpook National University, the species diversities and population densities of non-target insects found on insect-resistant genetically modified rice (Bt-9) resistant to Cnaphalocrocis medinalis and on non-GM rices (Dongjin and Ilmi) were investigated. The Bt-9 event was therefore evaluated under field conditions to detect possible impacts on the above ground insects and spiders. The study compared transgenic rice and two non-GM reference rices, Ilmi and Dongjin, at Gunwi in Southern Korea in 2016. Each rice was grown on three $18m^2$ plots with a randomized block design. A total of 4,243 individuals from 43 families and 9 orders were collected from the LMO isolation field. In the three types of rice fields, a total of 1,467 individuals from the insect-resistant genetically modified rice (Bt-9), 1,423 individuals from the Ilmi, and 1,353 individuals from the Dongjin were collected, respectively. There was no difference between the population densities of the non-target insect pests, natural enemies and other insects on the insect-resistant genetically modified rice (Bt-9) and non-GM rices. These results provide the diversity and population density of non-target insects for an environment risk assessment survey on insect-resistant genetically modified rice and could be used as a guideline to make a biosafety assessment method for genetically modified crops.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae SM, Yu MR, Yun HG, Shin TY, Choi JB, Lee WW, Kim HJ, Kim HT, Woo SD. 2012. Assessment of insects in transgenic rice (CPPO06) resistant to the herbicide. Journal Agriculture Science Chungbuk National University 28:137-142. [in Korean]
  2. Choi WS, Ahn SJ, Yoon JH, Kim HH, Jang JW, Park JJ. 2015. Comparing of insect fauna between transgenic rice and common rice cultivar based on light tap and sweeping methods. Journal Agriculture & Life Science 49:1-17. [in Korean]
  3. James C. 2016. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2016. ISAAA Brief 52. ISAAA, Ithaca, NY, USA. http://www.isaaa.org.
  4. Kim KM, Ryu TH, Suh SJ. 2010. Studies on insect diversity related to genetically engineered vitamin A rice under large scale production. Korean Journal Breeding Science 42:157-162. [in Korean]
  5. Lee BK. 2017. A study on the establishment of isolation distances for environmental release of biotech crops. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 44:188-195. [in Korean]
  6. Lee DK, Park SH, Seong SY, Kim YS, Jung HR, Choi YD, Kim JK. 2016. Production of insect-resistant transgenic rice plants for use in practical agriculture. Plant Biotechnology Reports 10:391-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-016-0410-y
  7. Lee HS, Yi GH, Kim KM. 2012. Comparison of weed characteristics and possibility of gene flow in GM rice. Korean Journal of Weed Science 32:10-16. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5660/KJWS.2012.32.1.10
  8. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1999. Consensus document on the biology of Oryza sativa (Rice). Paris, France.
  9. Oh SD, Kim JS, Lee KJ, Ryu TH, Suh SJ. 2014. Studies on insect diversity related to drought-tolerant transgenic (Agb0103) rice under large scale GMO field. Korean Journal Breeding Science 46:136-142. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2014.46.2.136
  10. Son SM. 2001. Rice based meal for prevention of obesity and chronic disease. Korean Journal Community Nutrition 6:862-867. [in Korean]
  11. Qin Y, Kim SM, Park HY, Sohn JK. 2009. Inheritance analysis of giant mutation induced by T-DNA insertion in rice. Korean Journal Breeding Science 41:9-15.

Cited by

  1. Molecular biological analysis of Bt-transgenic (Bt-9) rice and its effect on Daphnia magna feeding vol.46, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20190002
  2. Evaluation of the acute toxicity of theoredoxin (TRX) transgenic soybean to Daphnia magna vol.47, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20200066
  3. Risk assessment and evaluation of epidermal growth factor (EGF) transgenic soybean: responses of Cyprinus carpio fed on EGF transgenic soybean vol.47, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20200068