DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Evaluation of Potential Invasive Species in the Gangneungnamdae Stream in Korea using a Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit

FISK (Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit)를 이용한 강릉남대천의 잠재적 침습 이입종 평가

  • Kim, Jeong Eun (Department of Biological Science, College of Science & Engineering, Sangji University) ;
  • Lee, Hwang Goo (Department of Biological Science, College of Science & Engineering, Sangji University)
  • Received : 2017.11.24
  • Accepted : 2018.03.12
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to understand the current status of the translocated species using a precede study and a model to evaluate the potential invasiveness that could adversely affect the aquatic ecosystem in the Gangneungnamdae Stream. A total of 12 translocated species were investigated and identified from 9 sites in a precede study, and steadily increased since 1982. For the study, which utilized research based on the total FISK (Fish Invasivenss Screening Kit) scores, all of the non-native fishes in Gangneungnamdae Stream were classified into two groups: namely as a high and a medium risk of becoming invasive. It was determined that there were two species (Zacco platypus and Pseudorasbora parva) that were determined to have posed the highest risk. The study determined that the mean scores were shown to have ranged from $3.06({\pm}0.16)-3.42({\pm}0.13)$. Consequently, the habitat analysis showed that the determined QHEI (Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index) values in the stream averaged 146 (88-171), indicating that an optimal habitat condition did exist in that locale. It can be inferred that compared to land use in the surrounding watersheds, the QHEI values and frequency of translocated species showed the lower the altitude of stream, the QHEI values were decreased and in case of land use pattern, a noted decreased forest and grassland area, and gradually increased urbanized area was seen to exist in the region. The correlation between the fish assemblage, QHEI, land use pattern of surrounding watershed and number of translocated species was identified and analyzed when the stream altitude decreased, and the number of species was increased (r= - 0.782, p=0.0127), the number of species was decreased (r= - 0.737, p=0.0234), and finally when the QHEI values were decreased, it was noted that the urbanized area was increased (r=0.292, p=0.446). In the case of the number of translocated species, when the number of translocated species was increased, the associated urbanized area was increased.

본 연구는 선행된 연구자료의 어류군집을 이용하여 강릉 남대천 내 이입종의 현황을 파악하고, 수생태계에 악영향을 미칠 수 있는 잠재적 침습성을 평가하고자 실시하였다. 강릉 남대천에 서식하고 있는 국내 타수계 이입종은 12종으로 조사되었으며, 1982년 이후로 지속적으로 증가하는 추세를 나타냈다. 이입종의 FISK 평가 결과 피라미 (Zacco platypus)와 참붕어 (Pseudorasbora parva)가 높은 침습성을 보이는 것으로 분석되었다. FISK 질문의 답변에 대한 신뢰도 값은 평균 $3.2(3.06{\pm}0.16{\sim}3.42{\pm}0.13)$로 분석되었으며, 최대 신뢰도 값이 4인 것을 고려할 때, 상대적으로 높은 수준을 나타내었다. 조사지점별 물리적 서식지 평가 (Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index; QHEI) 결과 평균 146 (88~171)으로 최적의 서식처 환경을 유지하고 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 지점별 하천 인근 토지이용률과 QHEI, 이입종 출현빈도를 구분한 결과 하천의 고도가 낮아질수록 QHEI 값은 감소하는 결과를 나타내었으며, 토지이용 측면에서는 산림지역이 감소하고, 도심지역이 점차 증가하는 경향을 나타내었다. 어류군집, QHEI, 하천 인근 토지이용률, 이입종간의 상관관계 분석을 실시한 결과 하천 상 하류간의 연속성을 나타내는 고도와 지점별 종수 (r= -0.782, p=0.0127), 종수와 산림지역 (r= - 0.737, p=0.0234), QHEI와 도심지역 (r= - 0.292, p= 0.446)과는 음의 상관성을 나타내었으며, 타수계 이입종의 경우 도심지역과는 양의 상관성 (r=0.313, p=0.412)을 나타내었으나 통계적으로는 유의하지 않은 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Almeida D, F Ribeiro, PM Leunda, L Vilizzi and GH Copp. 2013. Effectiveness of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes, to perform risk identfication assessments in the Iberian Peninsula. Risk Anal. 33:1404- 1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12050
  2. An KG, SH Jung and SS Choi. 2001. An evaluation on health conditions of Pyeong-Chang River using the Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) and Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (QHEI). Korean J. Limnol. 34:153-165.
  3. Baron JS, NL Poff, PL Angermeler, CN Dahm, PH Gleick, NG Hairston, RB Hackson, GA Johnston, BD Richter and AD Steinman. 2002. Meeting ecological and societal needs for freshwater. Ecol. Appl. 12:1247-1260. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1247:MEASNF]2.0.CO;2
  4. Byeon HK. 2014. Habitat characteric of Coreoperca herzi and Coreoleucisecus splendidus and effect on introduce to different water system. Korean J. Nat. Conserv. 16:13-23.
  5. Byeon HK and JK Oh. 2015. Fluctuation of fish community and inhabiting status of introduced fish in Gangeungnamdae Stream, Korea. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 29:718-728. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2015.29.5.718
  6. Byeon MS, HK Park, WO Lee and DS Kong. 2008. Fish fauna and community structure in Lake Paldang and its inflows. J. Korean Soc. Water Environ. 24:206-213.
  7. Casal CMV. 2006. Global documentation of fish introductions: the growing crisis and recommendations for action. Biol. Invasions 8:3-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-0231-3
  8. Chae BS, SK Kim, YH Kang, NS HEO, JM Park, HU Ha and UW Hwang. 2015. Ichthyofauna and fish community structure in upper reach of the Nakdong River, Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 27:116-132.
  9. Choi JS, HK Byeon and KS Choi. 1995. Studies on stream conditions and fish community in Osip Stream (Samchuk County). Korean J. Limnol. 28:263-270.
  10. Choi JW and KG An. 2013. Ecological health assessments on stream order in Southern Han River watershed and physical habitat assessments. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 31:440-447. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2013.31.4.440
  11. Choi KC, SR Jeon and IS Kim. 1984. The atlas of Korean freshwater fishes. Kor. Ins. Fres. Biol. 1-95.
  12. Copp GH, L Vilizzi, J Mumford, GV Fenwick, MJ Godard and RE Gozlan. 2009. Calibration of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes. Risk Anal. 29:457-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01159.x
  13. Copp GH, R Harthwaite and RE Gozlan. 2005. Risk identification and assessment of non-native freshwater fishes: Concepts and perspectives on protocols for the UK. Science series Technical Report. Cefas, Lowesoft.
  14. Didham RK, JM Tylianakis, MA Hutchison, RM Ewers and NJ Gemmell. 2005. Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:470-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.006
  15. Gozaln RE. 2008. Introduction of non-native freshwater fish: is it all bad? Fish Fish. 9:106-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2007.00267.x
  16. Han JH and KG An. 2013. Chaemical water quality and fish community characteristics in the mid-to downstream reach of Geum River. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 31:180-188. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2013.31.3.180
  17. Han JH, CS Park, JW An, KG An and WK Paek. 2015. Identification guide to freshwater fishes of Korea. EcoNature, Seoul.
  18. Hong SS and SH Kim. 2014. A study on characteristic of Seoul stream and its surrounding urban fabric: Focused on Jungnangcheon, Tancheon, Anyangcheon. Korean Ins. Architect. 34:239-240.
  19. Hong YK, KH Kim, KM Kim, GH Lim, MY Song and WO Lee. 2016. Characteristics of fish fauna and community structure in Wangpicheon. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 30:874-887. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2016.30.5.874
  20. Jang MH, GI Cho, HB Song, HK Byeon, HW Kim and GJ Joo. 2003. Fish distribution and water quality of mountain streams in the Jirisan national park, Korea. Korean J. Ecol. 26:297-305. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2003.26.6.297
  21. Jeon SR. 1980. Studies on the distribution of freshwater fishes from Korea. Ph. D. Dissertation, Univ. of Chungang, Seoul. pp. 14-49.
  22. Jeon SR. 1982. A study on fish fauna basin of small stream system flowing into the East Sea, Korea. Korean J. Nat. Conserv. Report. pp. 231-248.
  23. Jeong MG. 1977. The fishes of Korea. Iljisa. Korea. pp. 1-727.
  24. Kim CH, WO Lee, KE Hong, CH Lee and JH Kim. 2006a. Ichthyofauna and fish community structure in Namdae Stream, Yangyang, Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 18:112-118.
  25. Kim CH, KE Hong, JH Kim and KH Kim. 2006b. Ichthyofauna in Yeongok Stream, Gangneung, Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 18:244-250.
  26. Kim CH, EJ Kang, H Yang, KS Kim and WS Choi. 2012. Characteristics of fish fauna collected from near estuary of Seomjin River and population ecology. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 30:319-327. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2012.30.4.319
  27. Kim HM, JH Lee and KG An. 2008. Water quality and ecosystem health assessments in urban stream ecosystems. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 26:311-322.
  28. Kim IS, Y Choi, CL Lee, YJ Lee, BJ Kim and JH Kim. 2005. Illustrated book of Korean fishes. Kyo-haksa. Seoul. pp. 1-615.
  29. Kim IS. 1997. Illustrated encyclopedia of fauna & flora of Korea. Vol. 37. Freshwater fishes. Ministry of Education. Yeongi. pp. 1-518.
  30. Kim JR and CL Lee. 2001. Ichthyofauna and fish community from the Dongjin River system, Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 13:40-49.
  31. Kim YP, EH Lee and KG An. 2009. Ecological health assessment of Dongjin River based on chemical measurement and fish assemblage analysis. Korean J. Limnol. 42:183-191.
  32. Lawson LL, JE Hill, S Hardin, L Vilizzi and GH Copp. 2015. Evaluation of the fish invasiveness screening kit (FISK v2) for peninsular Florida. Management 6:413-422.
  33. Lee WO, CB Kang, HU Park, MC Han, HK Byeon, JG Myeong, CH No, GP Hong, HP Song, BS Chae, KH Han, JR Go and YP Hong. 2003. The introduced fishes of Korea. Guryongmunhwasa, Seoul.
  34. Lee WO, MH Ko, JM Bak, DH Kim, HJ Jeon and KH Kim. 2010. Characteristics of fish fauna and community structure in Buk stream of Goseong, Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 22:238-248.
  35. Lozon JD and HJ MacIsaac. 1997. Biological invasions: are they dependent on disturbance? Environ. Rev. 5:131-144. https://doi.org/10.1139/a97-007
  36. Mastitsky SE, AY Karatayev, LE Burlakova and BV Adamovich. 2010. Non-native fishes of Belarus: Diversity, distribution and risk classification using the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK). Aquat. Invasions 5:103-114. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2010.5.1.12
  37. Mendoza R, S Luna and C Aguilera. 2015. Risk assessment of the ornamental fish trade in Mexico: Analysis of freshwater species and effectiveness of the FISK (Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit). Biol. Invasions 17:3491-3502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-0973-5
  38. Onikura N, J Nakajima, R Inui, H Mizutani, M Kobayakawa, M Fukuda, S Fukuda and T Mukai. 2011. Evaluating the potential for invasion by alien freshwater fishes in northern Kyushu island, Japan, using the Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit. Ichthyol. Res. 58:382-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-011-0235-1
  39. Piria M, M Povz, L Vilizzi, D Zanella, P Simonovic and GH Copp. 2015. Risk screening of non-native freshwater fishes in Croatia and Slovenia using the fish invasiveness screening kit. Fisheries Manag. Ecol. 23:21-31.
  40. Puntila R, L Vilizzi, M Lehtiniemi and GH Copp. 2013. First Application of FISK, the freshwater fish invasiveness screening kit, in Northern Europe: Example of Southern Finland. Risk Anal. 33:1397-1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12069
  41. Rand TA, JM Tylianakis and T Tscharntke. 2006a. Spillover edge effects: the dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats. Ecol. Lett. 9:603-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00911.x
  42. Rand TA and SA Louda. 2006b. Spillover of agriculturally subsidized predators as a potential threat to native insect herbivores in fragmented landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 20:1720- 1729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00507.x
  43. Ricclardi A and JB Rasmussen. 1999. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conserv. Biol. 13:1220-1222. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98380.x
  44. Ross ST. 1991. Mechanisms structuring streams fish assemblages are there lessons from introduced species. Environ. Biol. Fishes 30:359-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02027979
  45. Suarez AV and TJ Case. 2002. Bottom-up effects on persistence of a specialist predator: Ant invasions and horned lizards. Ecol. Appl. 12:291-298. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0291:BUEOPO]2.0.CO;2
  46. Tarkan AS, L Guler Ekmekci, L Vilizzi and GH Copp. 2014. Risk screening of non-native freshwater fishes at the frontier between Asia and Europe: First application in Turkey of the fish invasiveness screening kit. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 30: 392-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12389
  47. Vilizzi L and GH Copp. 2013. Application of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes in the Murray-Darling Basin (Southeastern Austrailia). Risk Anal. 33:1432-1440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01860.x
  48. Whittier TR and TM Kincaid. 1999. Introduced fish in Northeastern USA lakes: regional extent, dominance, and effect on native species richness. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 128:769- 783. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1999)128<0769:IFINUL>2.0.CO;2
  49. Won DH, MS Byun, JH Park, SW Lee and SJ Hwang. 2010. The assessment of stream ecosystem health and evaluate the current status of aquatic ecosystem health in five major rivers in Korea. KSCE and KES Joint Conference. pp. 149- 160.