Progress in Medical Physics (한국의학물리학회지:의학물리)

Korean Society of Medical Physics (한국의학물리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preliminary Phantom Experiments to Map Amino Acids and Neurotransmitters Using MRI

  • Oh, Jang-Hoon (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Hyug-Gi (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Woo, Dong-Cheol (Biomedical Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Rhee, Sun Jung (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Soo Yeol (Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Electronics and Information, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Jahng, Geon-Ho (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2018.03.23
  • Accepted : 2018.03.30
  • Published : 2018.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) effect of amino acids and neurotransmitters, which exist in the human brain, depending on the concentration, pH, and amplitude of the saturation radiofrequency field. Phantoms were developed with asparagine (Asn), ${\gamma}-aminobutyric$ acid (GABA), glutamate (Glu), glycine (Gly), and myoinositol (MI). Each chemical had three different concentrations of 10, 30, and 50 mM and three different pH values of 5.6, 6.2, and 7.4. Full Z-spectrum CEST images for each phantom were acquired with a continuous-wave radiofrequency (RF) saturation pulse with two different $B_1$ amplitudes of $2{\mu}T$ and $4{\mu}T$ using an animal 9.4T MRI system. A voxel-based CEST asymmetry was mapped to evaluate exchangeable protons based on amide (-NH), amine ($-NH_2$), and hydroxyl (-OH) groups for the five target molecules. For all target molecules, the CEST effect was increased with increasing concentration and B1 amplitude; however, the CEST effect with varying pH displayed a different trend depending on the characteristics of the molecule. On CEST asymmetric maps, Glu and MI were well visualized around 3.0 and 0.9 ppm, respectively, and were well separated macroscopically at a pH of 7.4. The exchange rates of Asn, Glu, BABA, and Gly usually decreased with increasing pH. The CEST effect was dependent on the concentration, acidity of the target molecules, and B1 amplitude of the saturation RF pulse. The CEST effect for Asn can be observed in a 9.4T MRI system. The results of this study are based on applying the CEST technique in patients with neurodegenerative diseases when proteins in the brain are increased with disease progression.

Keywords

References

  1. Guivel-Scharen V, Sinnwell T, Wolff SD, Balaban RS. Detection of proton chemical exchange between metabolites and water in biological tissues. J Magn Reson 1998;133: 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.1998.1440
  2. Dagher AP, Aletras A, Choyke P, Balaban RS. Imaging of urea using chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer at 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12: 745-748. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2586(200011)12:5<745::AID-JMRI12>3.0.CO;2-H
  3. Cai K, Haris M, Singh A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of glutamate. Nat Med 2012;18: 302-306. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2615
  4. Ahmed M, Davis J, Aucoin D, et al. Structural conversion of neurotoxic amyloid-beta(1-42) oligomers to fibrils. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010;17: 561-567. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1799
  5. Rauscher S, Baud S, Miao M, Keeley FW, Pomes R. Proline and glycine control protein self-organization into elastomeric or amyloid fibrils. Structure 2006;14: 1667-1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2006.09.008
  6. Harmeier A, Wozny C, Rost BR, et al. Role of amyloidbeta glycine 33 in oligomerization, toxicity, and neuronal plasticity. J Neurosci 2009;29: 7582-7590. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1336-09.2009
  7. Kogan F, Hariharan H, Reddy R. Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) Imaging: Description of Technique and Potential Clinical Applications. Curr Radiol Rep 2013;1: 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-013-0010-3
  8. Haris M, Singh A, Cai K, et al. MICEST: a potential tool for non-invasive detection of molecular changes in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci Methods 2013;212: 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.09.025
  9. Haris M, Cai K, Singh A, Hariharan H, Reddy R. In vivo mapping of brain myo-inositol. Neuroimage 2011;54: 2079-2085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.017
  10. Oh JH, Kim HG, Woo DC, Jeong HK, Lee SY, Jahng GH. Chemical-Exchange-Saturation-Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Map Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Glutamate, Myoinositol, Glycine, and Asparagine: Phantom Experiments. J Korean Phys Soc 2017;70: 545-553. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.70.545
  11. McVicar N, Li AX, Meakin SO, Bartha R. Imaging chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) effects following tumor-selective acidification using lonidamine. NMR Biomed 2015;28: 566-575. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3287
  12. McMahon MT, Gilad AA, Zhou J, Sun PZ, Bulte JW, van Zijl PC. Quantifying exchange rates in chemical exchange saturation transfer agents using the saturation time and saturation power dependencies of the magnetization transfer effect on the magnetic resonance imaging signal (QUEST and QUESP): Ph calibration for poly-L-lysine and a starburst dendrimer. Magn Reson Med 2006;55: 836-847. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20818
  13. Jahng GH, Oh JH. Physical Modeling of Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging. Progress in Medical Physics 2017;28: 135-143. https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2017.28.4.135
  14. Zaiss M, Bachert P. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and MR Z-spectroscopy in vivo: a review of theoretical approaches and methods. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58: R221-269. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/R221
  15. McVicar N, Li AX, Goncalves DF, et al. Quantitative tissue pH measurement during cerebral ischemia using amine and amide concentration-independent detection (AACID) with MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2014;34: 690-698. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2014.12
  16. Zong X, Wang P, Kim SG, Jin T. Sensitivity and source of amine-proton exchange and amide-proton transfer magnetic resonance imaging in cerebral ischemia. Magn Reson Med 2014;71: 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24639
  17. Ward KM, Balaban RS. Determination of pH using water protons and chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST). Magn Reson Med 2000;44: 799-802. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594(200011)44:5<799::AID-MRM18>3.0.CO;2-S
  18. van Zijl PC, Yadav NN. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't? Magn Reson Med 2011;65: 927-948. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22761
  19. Schmitt B, Zaiss M, Zhou J, Bachert P. Optimization of pulse train presaturation for CEST imaging in clinical scanners. Magn Reson Med 2011;65: 1620-1629. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22750
  20. Zu Z, Li K, Janve VA, Does MD, Gochberg DF. Optimizing pulsed-chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging sequences. Magn Reson Med 2011;66: 1100-1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22884
  21. Tee YK, Khrapitchev AA, Sibson NR, Payne SJ, Chappell MA. Evaluating the use of a continuous approximation for model-based quantification of pulsed chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST). J Magn Reson 2012;222: 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2012.07.003

Cited by

  1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Historical Overview, Technical Developments, and Clinical Applications vol.31, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2020.31.3.35