DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Position Value for Relative Comparison of Healthcare Status of Korea among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries, 2015

2015년 한국 보건의료의 상대적 위치와 추이: 경제협력개발기구 국가와 비교

  • Chae, Wonjenog (Department of Public Health, Yonsei University Graduate School) ;
  • Lee, Sang Ah (Department of Public Health, Yonsei University Graduate School) ;
  • Park, Eun-Cheol (Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University)
  • 채원정 (연세대학교 대학원 보건학과) ;
  • 이상아 (연세대학교 대학원 보건학과) ;
  • 박은철 (연세대학교 보건정책 및 관리연구소)
  • Received : 2018.03.02
  • Accepted : 2018.03.14
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the status of Korean healthcare among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries and to monitor the trend of health care status since 2000. The position value for relative comparison (PARC) index was selected to gauge the level of healthcare status in demand, supply, accessibility, quality, and cost as per healthcare policy aspects. The Mann-Kendall test was conducted to allocate healthcare status of Korea since 2000. The PARC values indicate strength and weakness of Korean healthcare system by the mathematical comparisons. Korea positioned higher in demand, supply, accessibility, and quality. Yet, there are shortages in human resources and primary care. In conclusion, we suggest utilizing this study provides evidence to prioritize health care problems that can lead to establishing healthcare policy.

Keywords

References

  1. Park EC, Jang SI. The diagnosis of healthcare policy problems in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2012;55(10):932-939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.10.932.
  2. Evans SM, Lowinger JS, Sprivulis PC, Copnell B, Cameron PA. Prioritizing quality indicator development across the healthcare system: identifying what to measure. Intern Med J 2009;39(10):648-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01733.x.
  3. The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine. Preventive medicine and public health. 3rd ed. Seoul: Kyechuk Munwhasa; 2017.
  4. Jang SI, Nam JM, Choi J, Park EC. Disease management index of potential years of life lost as a tool for setting priorities in national disease control using OECD health data. Health Policy 2014;115(1):92-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.11.007.
  5. Lee SA, Park EC. Position value for relative comparison of healthcare status of Korea in 2014. Health Policy Manag 2017;27(1):88-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2017.27.1.88.
  6. Statistics Korea. 2015 Birth statistics. Daejeon: Korean Statistical Information Service; 2018.
  7. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD data: fertility rate [Internet]. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2018 [cited 2018 Feb 20]. Available from: https://data.oecd.org.
  8. Barro R. Health and economic growth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996.
  9. Bloom DE, Canning D. Population health and economic growth. Washington (DC): the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank; 2008.
  10. Suh M, Song S, Cho HN, Park B, Jun JK, Choi E, et al. Trends in participation rates for the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea, 2002-2012. Cancer Res Treat 2017;49(3):798-806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.186.
  11. Park EC. Cancer control policy, theory and reality. Goyang: National Cancer Center; 2010.
  12. Dussault G, Franceschini MC. Not enough there, too many here: understanding geographical imbalances in the distribution of the health workforce. Hum Resour Health 2006;4:12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-4-12.
  13. Kang AG. An analysis of the equity in health service utilization with the regional distribution of health care resources. Korean Soc Secur Stud 2007;23:189-219.
  14. Park HW. Improving quality of healthcare in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2012;55(10):969-977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.10.969.