DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Visual Feedback of Head Angles With Using a Mobile Posture-Aware System on Craniocervical Angle and Neck and Shoulder Muscles Fatigue During Watching the Smartphone

  • Kim, Su Jeong (Department of Physical Therapy, Ppuri Medical Center) ;
  • Jeong, So Yeon (Department of Physical Therapy, National Transportation Rehabilitation Hospital) ;
  • Yoon, Tae Lim (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Medical Science, Cheongju University)
  • Received : 2018.03.06
  • Accepted : 2018.04.26
  • Published : 2018.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: To find the effect of visual feedback of head angle with using a mobile posture-aware system on craniocervical angle and neck and shoulder muscles fatigue for preventing or decreasing the forward head posture. Methods: Twenty-four healthy young adults in Chungbuk to participate in this study. The subjects started to watch a movie clip for 10 minutes with visual feedback in $0^{\circ}$, $30^{\circ}$, and $60^{\circ}$ of head angles. During the task, surface electromyography (EMG) was used to collect data from the upper trapezius (UT), sternocleidomasetoid muscle (SCM), cervical erecter spinae (CES) during watching the smartphone. Craniocervical angles were measured using a sagittal-view photograph of the subject in a sitting posture. A one-way repeated analysis of variance with a significant level of 0.05 used for statistical analysis. Results: Craniocervical angle with $0^{\circ}$ visual feedback was significantly greater than $30^{\circ}$ and $60^{\circ}$. Craniocervical angle with $30^{\circ}$ visual feedback was significantly greater than $60^{\circ}$. In addition, MDF of UT muscles in $0^{\circ}$ and $30^{\circ}$ of visual feedback was significantly greater than $60^{\circ}$. Conclusion: We concluded that $0^{\circ}$ visual feedback of head angle with using a mobile posture-aware system would be beneficial to prevent or decrease forward head posture during watching a smartphone. We also could recommend using of $30^{\circ}$ visual feedback in case of caring UT muscle fatigue primarily.

Keywords

References

  1. Arslan A, Unal AT. Examination of cell phone usage habits and purposes of education faculty students. IJHS. 2013;10(1):182-201.
  2. Park JH, Kim JH, Kim JG et al. The effects of heavy smartphone use on the cervical angle, pain threshold of neck muscles and depression. Adv Sci Technol Lett. 2015;91:12-7.
  3. Lee HS, Choi YS, Lee SJ et al. A new posture monitoring system for preventing physical illness of smartphone users. IEEE. 2013:713-16.
  4. Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Perez-de-Heredia M, Molero-Sanchez A et al. Performance of the craniocervical flexion test, forward head posture, and headache clinical parameters in patients with chronic tension-type headache: a pilot study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(2):33-9. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2007.2401
  5. Raine S, Twomey LT. Head and shoulder posture variations in 160 asymptomatic women and men. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(11):1215-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90335-X
  6. Thomas K, Cureton JR. Bodily posture as an indicator of fitness. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1941;12:348-67.
  7. Kim MH, Yi CH, Kwon OY et al. Changes in neck muscle electromyography and forward head posture of children when carrying schoolbags. Ergonomics. 2008;51(6):890-901. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701852747
  8. Yoo W. Effect of the neck retraction taping (NRT) on forward head posture and the upper trapezius muscle during computer work. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(5):581-2. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.581
  9. Kim EJ, Kim JW, Park BR. Effects of sling exercise program on muscle activity and cervical spine curvature of forward head posture. Jour of KoCon.a. 2011;11(11):213-20.
  10. Harman K, Hubley-Kozey CL, Butler H. Effectiveness of an exercise program to improve forward head posture in normal adults: a randomized, controlled 10-week trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2005;13(3):163-76. https://doi.org/10.1179/106698105790824888
  11. Morningstar MW, Strauchman MN, Weeks DA. Spinal manipulation and anterior head weighting for the correction of forward head posture and cervical hypolordosis: a pilot study. Chiropr Med. 2003;2(2):51-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60042-1
  12. Quek J, Pua YH, Clark RA et al. Effects of thoracic kyphosis and forward head posture on cervical range of motion in older adults. Man Ther. 2013;18(1):65-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.07.005
  13. Jensen C, Vasseljen O, Westgaard RH. The influence of electrode position on bipolar surface electromyogram recordings of the upper trapezius muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;67(3):266-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00864227
  14. Tarmin SB, Akir NF, Guan NY et al. The effect of using dual screen computer panel to the neck-shoulder muscle activity among group of students. Iran J Public Health. 2016;45(1):61-7.
  15. Cram JR, Kasman GS, Holtz J. Introduction to surface electromyography. Gaithersburg, Aspen Publishers, 1998.
  16. Farina D, Madeleine P, Graven-Nielsen T et al. Standardising surface electromyogram recordings for assessment of activity and fatigue in the human upper trapezius muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;86:469-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-001-0574-0
  17. Murata A, Uetake A, Matsumoto S et al. Evaluation of shoulder muscular fatigue induced during mouse operation in a VDT task. IEICE. 2005; 88(2):223-9.
  18. Kuo YL, Tully EA, Galea MP. Video analysis of sagittal spinal posture in healthy young and older adults. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32(3):210-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.02.002
  19. Park S, Yoo W. Effect of EMG-based feedback on posture correction during computer operation. J Occup Health. 2012;54(4):271-7. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.12-0052-OA
  20. Lee HS, Choi YS, Lee SJ et al. Smart pose: mobile posture-aware system for lowering physical health risk of smartphone users. CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2013:2257-66.
  21. Yoo W, Yi C, Kim M. Effects of a proximity-sensing feedback chair on head, shoulder, and trunk postures when working at a visual display terminal. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(4):631-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9059-7
  22. Kong YK. The effects of co-ordinating postures with shoulder and elbow flexion angles on maximum grip strength and upper-limb muscle activity in standing and sitting postures. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(4):595-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2014.11077077
  23. Lee SY, Lee DH, Park JS. Effect of the cervical flexion angle during smart phone use on muscle fatigue of the cervical erector spinae and upper trapezius. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;(27):1847-9.
  24. Lee TH, Lee JH, Lee YS et al. Changes in the activity of the muscles surrounding the neck according to the angles of movement of the neck in adults in their 20s. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(3):973. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.973
  25. Silva CR da, Silva D de O, Ferrari D et al. Exploratory study of electromyographic behavior of the vastus medialis and vastus lateralis at neuromuscular fatigue onset. Motriz Rev Ed Fis. 2014;20(2):213-20. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-65742014000200012

Cited by

  1. Reliability and Validity of Measurement Using Smart Phone-Based Goniometer on Pelvic Tilting Angle in Standing and Sitting Position vol.31, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2019.31.1.35