DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of consolidation time on the strength and failure behavior of freshwater ice rubble


Abstract

Medium-scale tests were conducted to measure and observe the strength and failure behavior of freshwater ice rubble. A custom box measuring $3.05m{\times}0.94m{\times}0.94m$, with Plexiglas walls was built so that failure mechanisms could be observed. Ice rubble beams of nominal thickness 50 cm were produced by placing randomly sized ice pieces into the box filled with water at its freezing temperature. After the specified consolidation time, ranging between 0.2 and 70.5 h, the ice rubble beam was deformed by pushing a platen vertically downwards though the center of the beam until failure. For consolidation times less than 4 h, the ice beam failed progressively and tended to fail by shearing on macroscopic scale. At times greater than 4 h the beam failed by bending. The change in failure behaviour has been attributed to the degree of bonding between ice blocks.

Keywords

References

  1. Azarnejad, A., Brown, T., 2001. Ice rubble behavior in punch test. J. Cold Reg. Eng. 15 (3), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2001)15:3(135)
  2. Brown, T., El Seify, M., 2005. A Unified Model for Rubble Ice Load and Behaviour. NRC Publications Archive, Canada.
  3. Bruneau, S., 1997. Development of a First-year Ridge Keel Load Model. PhD thesis. Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
  4. Cornett, A., Timco, G., 1995. Laboratory Tests on the Mechanical Properties of Saline Ice Rubble. NRC Report HYD-CTR-002, p. 171.
  5. Croasdale & Associates, 1997. In Situ Ridge Strength Measurements. A Study Sponsored by NRC (PERD) and Exxon Production Research Co.
  6. Croasdale & Associates, 1998. In Situ Ridge Strength Measurements. A Study Sponsored by NRC (PERD) and Exxon Production Research Co.
  7. Croasdale, K.R., 2012. A simple model for first-year ridge loads on sloping structures. In: Proceedings. IceTech, Banff.
  8. Fransson, L., Sandkvist, J., 1985. Brash ice shear properties - laboratory tests. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, vol. 1, pp. 75-87. Narssarssuaq, Greenland.
  9. Gale, A., Wong, T., Sego, D., Morgenstern, N., 1987. Stress-strain behavior of cohesionless broken ice. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, vol. 3, pp. 109-119. Fairbanks, AK.
  10. Heinonen, J., Maattanen, M., 2000. LOLEIF ridge-loading experiments-analysis of rubble strength in ridge keel punch test. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Ice, vol. 1, pp. 63-72. Gdnask, Poland.
  11. Hellmann, J., 1984. Basic investigations of mush ice. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ice, vol. 3, pp. 37-55. Hamburg, Germany.
  12. Keinonen, A., Nyman, T., 1978. An experimental model-scale study on compressible, frictional and cohesive behavior of broken ice masses. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Ice, vol. 2, pp. 335-353. Lulea, Sweden.
  13. Lemee, E., Brown, T., 2002. Small-scale plane strain punch tests. In: Proceedings of the 16th IAHR International Symposium on Ice, vol. 2, pp. 1-8. Dunedin, New Zealand.
  14. Lepparanta, M., Hakala, R., 1992. The structure and strength of first-year ridges in the Baltic Sea. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 20, 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-232X(92)90036-T
  15. Liferov, P., Bonnemaire, B., 2005. Ice rubble behaviour and strength: Part I. Review of testing and interpretation of results. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 41, 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2004.10.001
  16. Loset, S., Sayed, M., 1993. Proportional strain tests of fresh water ice rubble. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 7 (2), 44-61.
  17. Prodanovic, A., 1979. Model tests of ice rubble strength. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, pp. 89-105. Trondheim, Norway.
  18. Sayed, M., Timco, G., Lun, L., 1992. Testing ice rubble under proportional strains. In: Proceedings of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, pp. 335-341. Calgary, Canada.
  19. Schwarz, J., Frederking, R., Gavrillo, V., Petrov, I.G., Hirayama, K.I., Mellor, M., Tryde, P., Vaudrey, K.D., 1981. Standardized testing methods for measuring properties of ice. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 4, 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-232X(81)90007-0
  20. Serre, N., Repetto-Llamazares, A.H., Hoyland, K.V., 2011. Experiments on the relation between freeze-bonds and ice rubble strength, Part I: Shear box experiments. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Montreal, Canada.
  21. Shafrova, S., Hoyland, K.V., 2008. Morphology and 2D spatial strength distribution in two Arctic first-year sea ice ridges. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 51, 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.05.011
  22. Strub-Klein, L., Sudom, D., 2012. A comprehensive analysis of the morphology of first-year sea ice ridges. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 82, 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.05.014
  23. Timco, G., Cornett, A., 1999. Is r a constant for broken ice rubble?. In: Proceeding of the 10th Workshop on River Ice Management with a Changing Climate, pp. 318-331. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  24. Timco, G., Croasdale, K., Wright, B., 2000. An Overview of First-year Sea Ice Ridges. NRC Publications Archive, Canada.
  25. Timco, G., Funke, E., Sayed, M., Laurich, P., 1992. A laboratory apparatus to measure the behavior of ice rubble. In: Proceedings of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, pp. 369-375. Calgary, Canada.
  26. Urroz, G.E., Ettema, R., 1987. Simple-shear box experiments with floating ice rubble. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 14, 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-232X(87)90035-8
  27. Weiss, R., Prodanovic, A., Wood, K., 1981. Determination of ice rubble shear properties. In: Proceeding of the International Symposium on Ice, pp. 860-872. Quebec, Canada.
  28. Wong, T., Morgenstern, N., Sego, D., 1990. A constitutive model for broken ice. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 17, 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(05)80004-7