DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Electrochemical Corrosion and Hydrogen Diffusion Behaviors of Zn and Al Coated Hot-Press Forming Steel Sheets in Chloride Containing Environments

아연 및 알루미늄이 도금된 Hot-Press Forming 강의 염화물 환경 내 전기화학적 부식 및 수소확산거동

  • Park, Jin-seong (Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Lee, Ho Jong (Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung Jin (Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, Sunchon National University)
  • 박진성 (순천대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 이호종 (순천대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 김성진 (순천대학교 신소재공학과)
  • Received : 2018.03.28
  • Accepted : 2018.04.21
  • Published : 2018.05.27

Abstract

Hot-press forming(HPF) steel can be applied successfully to auto parts because of its superior mechanical properties. However, its resistances to aqueous corrosion and the subsequent hydrogen embrittlement(HE) decrease significantly when the steel is exposed to corrosive environments. Considering that the resistances are greatly dependent on the properties of coating materials formed on the steel surface, the characteristics of the corrosion and hydrogen diffusion behaviors regarding the types of coating material should be clearly understood. Electrochemical polarization and impedance measurements reveal a higher corrosion potential and polarization resistance and a lower corrosion current of the Al-coating compared with Zn-coating. Furthermore, it was expected that the diffusion kinetics of the hydrogen atoms would be much slower in the Al-coating, and this would be due mainly to the much lower diffusion coefficient of hydrogen in the Al-coating with a face-centered cubic structure. The superior surface inhibiting effect of the Al-coating, however, is degraded by the formation of local cracks in the coated layer under severe stress conditions, and therefore further study will be necessary to gain a clearer understanding of the effect of cracks formed on the coated layer on the subsequent corrosion and hydrogen diffusion behaviors.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Karbasian and A. E. Tekkaya, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 210, 2103 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.019
  2. M. C. Jo, J. Y. Park, S. S. S, S. W. Kim, J. K. Oh, and S. H. Lee, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 707, 65 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.09.027
  3. Y. Chang, Z. H. Meng, L. Ying, X. D. Li, N. Ma P. Hu, J. Iron. Steel Res. Int., 18, 59 (2011).
  4. H. L. Yi, S. Ghosh, and H. K. D. Bhadeshia, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527, 4870 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.04.022
  5. F. Hu, K. M. Wu, T. P. Hou, and A. A. Shirzadi, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 438 (2006).
  6. M. B. Djukic, V. S. Zeravcic, G. M. Bakic, A. Sedmak, and B. Rajicic, Eng. Fail. Anal., 58, 485 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.017
  7. S. W. Nam, Korean J. Met. Mater., 19, 971 (1981).
  8. V. Olden, A. Alvaro, and O. M. Akselsen, Int. J. Hyd. Ener., 37, 11474 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.005
  9. D. C. S. Garcia, R. N. Carvalho, V. F. C. Lins, D. M. Rezende, and D. S. Dos Santos, Int. J. Hyd. Ener., 40, 17102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.102
  10. A. Nagao, K. Hayashi, and K. Oi, S. Mitao, ISIJ Int., 52, 213 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.52.213
  11. A. V. Syugaev, N. V. Lyalina, S. F. Lomaeva, and S. M. Reshetnikov, Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surf., 48, 515 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070205112050127
  12. Tz. Boiadjieva, L. Mirkova, H. Kronberger, T. Steck, and M. Monev, J. Electrochem. Soc., 159, D730 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.057212jes
  13. A. R. Troiano, Trans. ASM, 52, 54 (1960).
  14. C. Zapffe, C. Sims, Trans. AIME, 145, 225 (1941).
  15. S. Peng, S. K. Xie, Y. M. Yang, G. Y. Xiao, and J. T. Lu, J. Alloy. Comp., 694, 1004 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.136
  16. M. Dong, X. Xue, A. Kumar, H. Yang, M. I. Sayyed, S. Liu, and E. Bu, J. Hazard. Mater., 344, 602 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.066
  17. P. Huilgol, S. Bthat, and K. U. Bhat, J. Coating. Tech. Res., 2013, 6 (2013).
  18. E. Lunarska, and O. Chernyayeva, Int. J. Hydrogen. Energ., 31, 237 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.052
  19. ISO 11997-1, (B) VDA 621-415, Testing of Corrosion Protection of Vehicle Paint by Alternating Cycles Test, ISO, Switzerland (2005).
  20. ISO 17081:2004 (E), Method of Measurement of Hydrogen Permeation and Determination of Hydrogen Uptake and Transport in Metals by an Electrochemical Technique, ISO, Switzerland (2004).
  21. P. V. K. Raju, K. A. Reddy, J. B. Rao, N. R. M. R. Bhargava, and M. I. Reddy, Mater. Today, 5, 1776 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.275
  22. S. Ze, Z. Donghui, Y. Baoxu, and K. Dejun, Optic. Laser. Tech., 99, 282 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.09.013
  23. T. M. Adams, P. Korinko, and A. Duncan, Mater. Sci. Eng, 424, 33 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.025
  24. J. Crank, The Mathematics of Diffusion (Second Edition), Oxford University Press, 273 (1975).
  25. S. K. Rajagopalan, p. 203-204, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (2012).