Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회논문집)

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Vulnerable Area and Naval Ship's Vulnerability based on the Carleton Damage Function

칼튼 손상함수를 이용한 주요장비의 취약 면적 산정과 함정 취약성 평가 방법

  • Lee, Jang Hyun (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Choi, Won Jun (Republic of Korea, Joint Chiefs of Staff)
  • 이장현 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 최원준 (대한민국, 합동참모본부)
  • Received : 2017.08.11
  • Accepted : 2018.05.01
  • Published : 2018.06.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper deals with the calculation of vulnerable areas of critical components required for the assessment of naval ship's vulnerability. Taking into account the effectiveness of threatening weapons, the probability density function of damage was used to assess vulnerable areas or vulnerabilities of critical components. It is shown that the vulnerable area of critical component can be simply computed from the damage function. Considering the weapon effectiveness of fragmentation and explosion on the target, both Carleton Damage Function and Rectangular Cookie Cutter Function representing the probability of damage are applied to the vulnerable area assessment. Carleton damage function is utilized to describe the weapon-target interaction in the vulnerability analyses. A problem of blast effect against an assumed naval ship is chosen as a case study. Vulnerability is evaluated by applying the suggested method to the equipments arranged in the engine room of the virtual ship.

Keywords

References

  1. Akesson, B.M., Lappi, E., Pettersson, V.H., Malmi, E., Syrjanen, S., Vulli, M., & Stenius, K., 2013. Validating indirect fire models with field experiments. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 10(4), pp.425-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548512913484400
  2. Ball, R.E., 1985. The fundamentals of aircraft combat survivability analysis and design. 1st Edition. AIAA Education Series: Monterey, California.
  3. Ball, R.E., 2003. The fundamentals of aircraft combat survivability analysis and design. 2nd Edition. AIAA Education Series: Monterey, California.
  4. Ball, R.E. & Calvano, C.N., 1994. Establishing the fundamentals of a surface ship survivability design discipline. Naval Engineers Journal, 106(1), pp.71-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1994.tb02798.x
  5. Bloom, J.B., Reese, R.M. & Hopkins, T.M., 1994. Live fire test and evaluation for ships. Naval Engineers Journal, 106(3), pp.228-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1994.tb02855.x
  6. Choi, Y.H., Lee, K.T., Pyun, J.J., Jang, Y.C., 2017. A study on Pk(Probability of Kill) calculation method of the direct fire weapon system using simulation. Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation, 26(3), pp.115-123. https://doi.org/10.9709/JKSS.2017.26.3.115
  7. Chung, J.H. & Kwon, J.I., 2008. Survivability analysis of a naval ship using the MOTISS program(I): theoretical background. Proceedings of the Annual Autumn Meeting of Society of Naval Architects of Korea, Changwon, Republic of Korea, pp.13-15 November 2008.
  8. Chusilp, P., Charubhun, W., & Koanantachai, P., 2014. Monte carlo simulations of weapon effectiveness using Pk matrix and carleton damage function. International Journal of Applied Physics and Mathematics, 4(4), pp.280-285. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJAPM.2014.V4.299
  9. Driels, M., 2013. Weaponeering: conventional weapon system effectiveness. Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  10. Driels, M. R., & Shin, Y. S., 2004. Determining the number of iterations for Monte Carlo simulations of weapon effectiveness. Naval Postgraduate School: Monterey, California.
  11. Fielding, J.P. & Nilubol, O., 2004. Integration of survivability assessment into combat aircraft design for operational effectiveness. Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan, 29 August - 3 September 2004, pp.1-10.
  12. JTCG/ME(Joint Technical Coordinating Group for Munitions Effectiveness), 2001. Survivability models and simulations. Aerospace systems survivability handbook series-Volume 5. JTCG/AS-01-D007.
  13. Kim, K.S., Lee, J.H. & Hwang, S.Y., 2011. Simplified vulnerability assessment procedure for the warship based on the vulnerable area approach. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 85(5), pp.404-413.
  14. Kim, K.S. & Lee, J.H., 2012. Vulnerability assessment procedure for the warship including the effect of shotline and penetration of fragments. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 49(3), pp.254-263. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2012.49.3.254
  15. Kim, K.S. & Lee, J.H., 2014. Integrated survivability assessment given multiple penetration hits. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 28(1), pp.69-76. https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2014.28.1.069
  16. Kim, K.S., Lee, J.H., Son, G.J. & Jhun, J.I., 2012. A study of the procedure for integrated survivability assessment. Proceedings of the Society of CAD/CAM Engineers Conference, Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea, 1-3 February 2012. pp.824-840.
  17. Lee, H.C. & Hong, Y.G., 2011. A study on the generation method of effectiveness data for surface to surface artillery System). Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 12(7), pp. 3197-3206. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2011.12.7.3197
  18. Lillis, J.A., 2002. Analysis of the applicability of aircraft vulnerability assessment and reduction techniques to small surface craft. Naval Postgraduate School: Monterey, California.
  19. Lucas, T.W., 2003. Damage functions and estimates of fratricide and collateral damage. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 50(4), pp.306-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.10057
  20. Lynch, D.D., Kunkel, R.W. & Juarascio, S.S., 1997. An analysis comparison using the Vulnerability Analysis for Surface Target(VAST) Computer Code and the Computation of Vulnerable Area and Repair Time (COVARTIII) Computer Code(No. ARL-MR-341). Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, Maryland.
  21. Otsin, N., 2005. Development of a combat aircraft operation and cost-effectiveness design methodology. Ph.D. Thesis. Granfield College of Aeronautics, Granfield University.
  22. Pei, Y., Song, B. & Han, Q., 2007. Method for assessing vulnerability of aircraft to spray fragments of missile. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 27(2), pp.161-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-8651(08)60016-2
  23. Pei, Y., Song, B., Han, Q. & Ou, B., 2006. Aircraft vulnerable-area decomposition method in the overlapping region of components. Journal of Aircraft. 43(4), pp.1138-1144. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.18041
  24. Pei, Y., Song, B., Han, Q. & Ou, B., 2009. A direct simulation method for calculating multiple-hit vulnerability of aircraft with overlapping components. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 22(6), pp.612-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(08)60149-1
  25. Shin, Y.H., Kwon, J.I., Chung, J.H. & Sajdak, A.W., 2012. Development of vulnerability analysis program for review of warship survivability at concept design stage. The 4th International Conference on Design and Analysis of Protective Structures, Jeju, Republic of Korea, 19-22 June 2012, pp.151-162