DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Big 5 personality on Entrepreneurship of the College Student -Focusing on the Moderating Effects of Flow and Self-efficacy-

대학생의 성격 5요인이 기업가정신에 미치는 영향 -몰입 및 자기효능감의 매개효과를 중심으로-

  • Baek, Yu-Mi (Education Counseling and Psychology, Graduate School of Cyber, Joongbu University)
  • 백유미 (중부대학교 원격대학원 교육상담심리학과)
  • Received : 2018.06.14
  • Accepted : 2018.06.20
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of undergraduates' Big 5 personality on entrepreneurship. Particularly, this author has verified if immersion and self-efficacy have mediating effects in it. According to the results, first, undergraduates' Big 5 personality are found to exert effects on entrepreneurship. Second, there is difference found in the influence of Big 5 personality on self-efficacy. Third, Big 5 personality and a parameter, self-efficacy, have all significant influence on entrepreneurship. Also, in all the models, the parameter of self-efficacy has partly mediating effects in correlation between Big 5 personality and entrepreneurship. Based on these results, this researcher here suggests implications and provides suggestions for follow-up research.

본 연구는 대학생의 성격 5요인이 기업가정신에 영향을 미치는지 확인하고자 하였다. 특히 몰입 및 자기효능감이 매개효과가 있는지도 탐색적으로 확인하였다. 연구 결과 첫째, 대학생의 성격 5요인은 기업가정신에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 성격 5요인이 자기효능감에 미치는 영향력은 차이가 있었다. 셋째, 성격 5요인과 매개변인인 자기효능감이 기업가정신에 미치는 영향력은 모두 유의미하였다. 또한 모든 모형에서 매개변인인 자기효능감이 성격 5요인과 기업가정신과의 관계를 부분매개하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과에 근거하여 시사점을 제시하고 미래 연구를 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. H. Park & S. H. Oh. (2016). The Relationship between Proactivity and Career Satisfaction: Toward Identifying the Moderating Roles of Person - Organization Value Fit and LMX. The Journal of business education. 31, 447-469.
  2. J. Y. Lee.(2017). The direction of youth career education in preparation for the fourth industrial revolution. The Journal of Career Education Research, 65-96.
  3. European Commission. (2013). Entrepreneurship 2020 Action Plan.
  4. M. L. Jeong & B. W. Kim. (2015), The Effects of Big 5 Personality and Cognitive Behavioral Variables on Career Decision Level of College Students in Social Cognitive Career Theory. The Journal of Career Education Research. 28(4), 41-57.
  5. G. W. Allport. (1961). Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
  6. P. T. Costa & R. R. MacCrae. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI - R) and NEO Five - Factor Inventory: Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
  7. R. R. McCrae & P. T. Costa Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist. 52(5), 509-516. DOI : 10.1037/0003-066x.52.5.509
  8. L. R. Goldberg. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
  9. L. R. Goldberg. (1993). The structure of Phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34. DOI : 10.1037//0003-066x.48.1.26
  10. H. Zhao & S. E. Seibert. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A metaanalytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology. 91(2), 259-271. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.259
  11. J. W. Park & W. J. Kim. (2014). A Study on the Relationships between HEXACO Personality, Entrepreneurship and the Firm Performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business. 36(2), 147-168.
  12. W. C. Borman, M. A. Hanson & J. W. Hedge. (1997). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology. 48(1), 299-337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.299
  13. A. Ardichvili, R. Cardozo, & S. Ray. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing. 18(1), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00068-4
  14. J. Bryce & J. Haworth. (2002). Wellbeing and flow in sample of male and female office workers. Leisure, 21, 249-263. DOI : 10.1080/0261436021000030687
  15. M. Csikszentmihalyi. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row, New York.
  16. Y. I .Yoon & D. H. Ha. (2016). Journal of Tourism Management Research, 68, 1-21.
  17. Y. W. Jung. (2011), The Hotel Organization Culture and Entrepreneurship as an influence on the Organizational Commitment. The Journal of Service Industry Research, 8(3), 115-132.
  18. J. W. Park. (2014). The Effect of Organization Entrepreneurship on Firm's Performance-Focus on the Organization Commitment of Food Service Industry Employee. FoodService Industry Journal, 10(2), 23-33. DOI : 10.22509/kfsa.2014.10.2.002
  19. A, Bandura. (1986), Social foundation so thought and action: A socialognitive theory. Englewood Ciffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  20. S. A. Jackson & H. W. Marsh. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the flow state scale. Journal Sport Exerc. Psychol. 18, 17-35. DOI : 10.1123/jsep.18.1.17
  21. J. H. Park & J. C. Lee. (2018). The Mediating Effect of Self-efficacy on the Relationship between Big 5 Personality and Happiness in Undergraduate Students. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 8(1), 709-718. DOI : 10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.050
  22. I. Park, J. H. Joo & B. G. Jung. (2017). A Study on the Interrelationship of Self-Leadership, Self-Efficacy, Entrepreneurship and Founding Will of College Students. Proceedings of the Spring Conference of the Korean Society for Human Resources Development..
  23. K. I. Lee & C. G. Ahn. (1996). Clinical Application of The Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Korean Journal of Counseling And Psychotherapy, 65-79.
  24. D. Miller. (1983). The correlaties of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-791. DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
  25. S. Zahara. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259-2. DOI : 10.1016/0883-9026(91)90019-a
  26. J. E. Cha. (1996). Study for the general self-efficacy scale development, Psychological research, 34, 19-31.
  27. R. M. Baron & D. A. Kenny. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. DOI : 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
  28. Y. S. Seo. (2010). Testing Mediator and Moderator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research: Conceptual Distinction and Statistical Considerations. Korean Journal Of Counseling And Psychotherapy, 22(4), 1147-1168. DOI : 10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115