Korea Journal of Hospital Management (한국병원경영학회지)

Korean Society of Hospital Management (한국병원경영학회)
권호 표지

The Effect of Organizational Justice on the Followership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior - the Moderating Effect of Leader-Member Exchange -

의료기관 사무직 종사자의 조직공정성이 Followership과 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향 - LMX 조절효과 -

  • 안재선 (가천대학교 헬스케어경영학과) ;
  • 김종두 (가천대학교 길병원) ;
  • 김문중 (가천대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2018.01.02
  • Accepted : 2018.06.12
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purposes: Based on samples of government officials who are working at public health centers, following research examines the Effect of Organizational Justice on the relationships between Followership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior and analyzes the moderating effect of Leader-Member Exchange. Methodology: For the methods, Sphericity verification, Exploratory factor analysis, Correlation analysis, Causal relation, Mediating effect of followership and Moderating Effect of The Leader-Member Exchange have been analyzed with SPSS 22.0 & AMOS 22.0 Ver. Findings: As a result of Correlation analysis, Predictive validity and Construct validity have meaningful effect. Also, In case of Path analysis, distributive justice and interactional justice have meaningful effect but procedural justice has no such effect on Followership. As a result of Mediated effect of followership analysis, distributive and interactional justice have positive impact on (Organizational and Interpersonal). As to the mediation effect of followership analysis, It is shown that distributive and Followership have meaningful effect on In-group, not Out-group. Lastly, It is shown that procedural justice and Followership have no meaningful effect on both In-group and Out-group. Practical Implications: For the implications, distributive justice and interactional justice have positive impact on Followership, while procedural justice has no such impact on Followership. Also, It also possibly has same result to the moderating effect of Leader-Member Exchange. Consequently, It is recognized that a fair process without a fair result cannot be valued. also, We can know that reward for procedural justice is evaluated to kind of negative.

Keywords

References

  1. Kelley R. The Power of Followership. NY: Double day Dell. 1994 7-8.
  2. Smith C, Organ, D, Near J. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature and Antecedents. Journal of applied Psychology. 1983 68: 653-663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653
  3. Yoon JH, Rhee JH. Effects of Perceived Fairness about Human Resource Management Practices on Organizational Commitment and Organizational. journal of economics and management. 2005:327-358.
  4. Anderson S, Williams L. Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behavior. Journal of Management. 1991 17: 601-617.
  5. Rupp DE, Cropanzano R. The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2002 89: 925-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00036-5
  6. Adams J. Inequity in Social Exchange. In Berkowitz, L.(Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2 NY: Academic Press. 1965 267-299.
  7. Thibaut J, Walker L. A theory of procedure. California law review. 1978 66: 541-566. https://doi.org/10.2307/3480099
  8. Lind E, Tyler T. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. NY: Plenum, 1998.
  9. Bies R, Moag J. International Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness, In Lewick, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., & Bazerman. M. H.(Ed.). Research in Negotiations in Organization, 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 1986 33-55.
  10. Cohen-Charash, Y., Spector, PE. The role of justice in organizations: a metaanalysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2001 86(2): 278-321. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958
  11. Rupp, DE., Shao, R., Jones, KS., Liao, H. The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: a metaanalytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchange. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2014 123: 159-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.011
  12. Skitka L, Winquist J, Hutchinson S. The effects of procedural and distributive justice: A meta-analytic review. Presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. San Diego, CA, 2001.
  13. Cropanzano R, Wright TA. A 5-year study of change in the relationship between well-being and job performance. Consulting Psychology Journal. 1999 51: 252-265. https://doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.51.4.252
  14. Follett M. The Essential Leadership, Urwick, ed., Freedom and Coordination, London, Management Publication Trust Ltd, 1949 47-60.
  15. Wortman M. Strategic Management and Changing Leader-Follower Roles. Journal of applied Behavioral Science. 1982 18: 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638201800310
  16. Kelley R. Rethinking Followership, In Riggio, Ronald E, Chaleff, Ira & Lipman-Blumen, Jean, The Art of Followership: How Great Followers Create Great Leaders Great Leaders and Organizations, Jossey-Bass, 2008 54-66.
  17. Howell, JM. Shamir, B. The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review, 2005 30: 96-112. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.15281435
  18. Agho A. Perspectives of Senior-Level Executives on Effective Followership and Leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2009 16(2): 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809335360
  19. Alcorn D. Dynamic Followership. Management Quarterly. 1992 33(1): 9-13.
  20. Kelley R. Transformational Leadership and The Performance Research and Development Project Groups. Journal of Management. 1992 18: 489-501.
  21. Lundin C, Lancaster C. Beyond Leadership, The Importance of Followership. The Futurist. 1990 4: 18-21.
  22. Stone, AG. Russell, RF., & Patterson, K. Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 2004 25: 349-361. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410538671
  23. Johnson, CE. Introducing followership into the leadership classroom: An integrative approach. Journal of Leadership Education, 2009 8: 20-30. https://doi.org/10.12806/V8/I2/AB3
  24. Appelbaum S, Bartolomucci N, Beaumier E, Boulanger J. Corrigan R, Dore I, Girard C. Organizational Citizenship Behavior. A case Study of Culture. Leadership and Trust, Management Decision, 2004 42(1): 13-40.
  25. Van Dyne L, Ang S, Koh, C. Development and Validation of the CQS: The Cultural Intelligence Scale. In Ang, S., & Van Dyne, L.(Ed.), Handbook on Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurement and Applications, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2008 16-38.
  26. Katz D. The Motivational Basis of Organizational Behavior. Behavioral Science. 1964 9: 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090206
  27. Organ D. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1988 4.
  28. Organ D. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-up Time. Human Performance. 1997 10(2): 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
  29. Organ D, Podsakoff P, MacKenzie S. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature. Antecedents, and Consequences. Thous and Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006.
  30. MacKenzie S, Podsakoff P, Ahearne M. Some Possible Antecedents and Consequences of In-Role and Extra-Role Salesperson Performance. Journal of Marketing. 1998 62: 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200306
  31. Morrison E. Role Definitions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Importance of the Employee's Perspective. Academy of Management Review. 1994 37: 1543-1567.
  32. Grean G, Scandura T. Toward a Psychology of Dyadic Organizing. In Cummings L. L., & Staw, B. M. (Ed.), Research In Organizational Behavior. 1987 9: 175-208.
  33. Dansereau F, Graen G, Haga W. A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach with In Formal Organization: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1975 13: 46-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
  34. Kang, KS. A Study on the Modulating effect of LMX and POS between Negative Behaviorsin Organization and Subordinate's Turnover intention, OCB. Daejeon Universit. Ph. D. Dissertation. 2013.
  35. Grean G, Uhi-Bien M. Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of LMX Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 1995 6(2): 219-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
  36. Lau D, Liden R. Antecedents of Coworker Trust: Leaders Blessings. Journal of applied Psychology. 2008 93: 1130-1138. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1130
  37. Clemmer E, Schneider B. Fair Service. In Swartz, T. A., Bowen, D. E., & Brown, S. W.(Ed.), Advances in Services Marketing and Management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 1996 109-126.
  38. Grean G, Casgman J. A Role-Making Model of Leadership in Formal Organizations: A Developmental Approach. In Hunt, J. G., & Larson, L. L.(Ed.), Leadership frontiers. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press. 1975 143-165.
  39. Alexander S, Ruderman M. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organization behavior. Social Justice Research. 1987 1(2): 177-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048015
  40. Ko JW, Lyou C. The Moderating Effect of Organizational Commitment on the Relationship between Job Stress and Organizational Citizenship Behavior among Hotel Employees. Journal of Business Research. 2006 21(3):167-190.
  41. Lee KG. The Effects of Procedural and Interactional Justice on Leader-Member Exchange, Perceived Organization Support, and Task Performance. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business. 2006 19(6): 2601-2627.
  42. Folger R, Konovsky MA. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal. 1989 32(1): 115-130. https://doi.org/10.2307/256422
  43. Chung HS. Effects of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Trust in Supervisor, Perceived Organizational Support, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Chonnam National University. Ph. D. Dissertation. 2003.
  44. Ahn KY, Kim GS. Mediating Effect of Superior Trust on the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Service Quality. Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering. 2006 29(2): 67-74.
  45. Niehoff BP, Moorman RH. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal. 1993 36: 527-556.
  46. Hendrix WH, Tina R, Janis M, Timothy PS. Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Factors Predictive of Turnover. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality. 1998 13: 611-633.
  47. Park JC, jeong GH. The Impact of Hotel Employees' Organizational Justice, Organizational Commitment, and Employee Effort on In-Role Behavior. Tourism Research. 2007 22(1): 365-383.
  48. Kang HK. The Effects of Romance of Leadership on Followership and Organizational Efficacy: Moderation Effect of Organizational Identification. Sookmyung Women's University. Ph. D. Dissertation. 2016.
  49. Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Moorman RH, Fetter R. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly. 1990 1(2): 107-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
  50. Kwon HN. (A) study on the effects of labor flexibility on job insecurity, organizational cynicism and organizational citizenship behavior of middle aged and elderly employees. Hanyang University. Ph. D. Dissertation. 2012.
  51. Lee KG, Kim JJ. Effects of Organizational Commitment on Organizational Gitizenship Behavior and Impression Management. Korea Journal of Business Administration. 2001 27: 189-217.
  52. Graen, GB. Uhl-Bien, M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader- member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multidomain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 1995, 6: 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
  53. Byun SJ. A Study on the Influence of Interactive Justice and LMX on Leader Trust, Reciprocation Wariness and Work Related Attitudes, between Leader and Subordinates. Kyonggi University. Ph. D. Dissertation. 2010.
  54. Holmbeck, GN. Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1997, 65: 599-610. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.65.4.599
  55. Kim YS. The Effect of Justice Perception on Job Satisfaction Organization Commitment and Turn over Intention: Focusing Sae Maul Kumko Members. Academic Society of Global Business Administration. 2014 11(2): 135-159.
  56. Vecchio R, Griffeth R, Hom P. The Predictive Utility of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach. Journal of Social Psychology. 1986 126: 617-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1986.9713634
  57. Kwon SS. The Dimensional Effects of Contact Employees Fairness Perception on Organizational Commitment. Academic Society of Global Business Administration. 2009 6(4): 115-140. https://doi.org/10.17092/jibr.2009.6.4.115