Parasites, Hosts and Diseases

  • 제56권3호
  • /
  • Pages.287-290
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2982-5164(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1738-0006(eISSN)
대한기생충학·열대의학회 (The Korea Society for Parasitology and Tropical Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Serological Detection of Antibodies against Anaplasma spp. in Cattle Reared in the Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea

  • Seo, Min-Goo (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Ouh, In-Ouh (Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Hun (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Son, Ui-Han (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Geraldino, Paul John L. (Department of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of San Carlos) ;
  • Rhee, Man Hee (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwon, Oh-Deog (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Hwan (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwak, Dongmi (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.09
  • 심사 : 2018.05.30
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Anaplasmosis is a tick-borne, non-contagious, zoonotic disease caused by Anaplasma spp., which include Anaplasma marginale, A. centrale, A. phagocytophilum, A. platys, A. ovis, and A. bovis. Recently, in Korea, the prevalence of Anaplasma spp. has been investigated in some animals, such as dogs, horses, goats, cats, and Korean water deer. In cattle, A. marginale is the most virulent species and regarded as the typical type of species. However, data on the seroprevalence of Anaplasma spp. in cattle in Korea during the last decade is limited. This study was designed to investigate the seroprevalence of bovine anaplasmosis in Korea. From 2010 to 2013, blood samples were collected from 568 cattle. Forty animals (7.0%) tested seropositive for Anaplasma spp. by cELISA. Despite that current bovine anaplasmosis seropositivity rate in the Gyeongsangbuk-do is lower than those in tropical countries, anaplasmosis needs to be regarded as a concerning disease. The identification of the specific Anaplasma species infecting cattle in this province requires additional molecular studies. Moreover, further monitoring and control programs for bovine anaplasmosis is required, and the information from this study will be beneficial to develop these programs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aubry P, Geale DW. A review of bovine anaplasmosis. Transbound Emerg Dis 2011; 58: 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2010.01173.x
  2. Kocan KM, de la Fuente J, Blouin EF, Coetzee JF, Ewing SA. The natural history of Anaplasma marginale. Vet Parasitol 2010; 167: 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.09.012
  3. Heo EJ, Park JH, Koo JR, Park MS, Park MY, Dumler JS, Chae JS. Serologic and molecular detection of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Anaplasma phagocytophila (human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent) in Korean patients. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 3082-3085. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.8.3082-3085.2002
  4. Chae JS, Heo EJ, Park JH, Choi KS, Dumler JS, Lee SS, Kang TY, Yang JH, Kim DY, Kim JG, Choi GC, Kang MI. Detection of antibodies reacting with Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia chaffeensis from cats, horses and cattle in Korea. J Vet Clin 2009; 26: 515-519.
  5. Oh MR, Moon KH, Kim SY, Kim YG, Choi CY, Kang CW, Kim HJ, Lee KK, Yun YM. Prevalence of Anaplasma sp. in Thrushes (Family Turdidae) in Jeju Island, Republic of Korea. J Vet Clin 2014; 31: 206-211. https://doi.org/10.17555/ksvc.2014.06.31.3.206
  6. Kang JG, Ko S, Kim YJ, Yang HJ, Lee H, Shin NS, Choi KS, Chae JS. New genetic variants of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma bovis from Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2011; 11: 929-938. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2010.0214
  7. Lee S, Lee SH, VanBik D, Kim NH, Kim KT, Goo YK, Rhee MH, Kwon OD, Kwak D. First molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in shelter dogs in Seoul, Korea. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2016; 7: 945-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.04.011
  8. Lee SH, VanBik D, Kim NH, Park SJ, Kwon OD, Kim TH, Kwak D. First molecular detection and genetic analysis of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in shelter cats in Seoul, Korea. Infect Genet Evol 2016; 46: 71-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.10.025
  9. Lee SH, Kim KT, Yun SH, Choi E, Lee GH, Park YS, Cho KH, Yi S, Kwon OD, Kim TH, Kwak D. Serological and molecular detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in horses reared in Korea. Vet Med 2015; 60: 533-538.
  10. Lee JM, Kwon OD, Song HJ, Park JH, Choi KS. Anaplasma marginale infection in holstein calves during winter. Korean J Vet Res 1997; 37: 911-916 (in Korean).
  11. Jeon Y. Isolation of Anaplasma centrale from Korean cattle. Korean J Vet Res 1978; 18: 19-22 (in Korean).
  12. Korean Statistical Information Service. Number of farms in households and animals in heads by type; the fourth quarter of 2016. [Internet]; 2016. Available from: http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml. do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1EO099&conn_path=I2&language=en.
  13. Thrusfield MV. Veterinary Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK. Blackwell Science. 2005, pp 228-330.
  14. Dunn OJ. Multiple comparisons among means. J Am Stat Assoc 1961; 56: 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090
  15. Hairgrove TB, Craig TM, Budke CM, Rodgers SJ, Gill RJ. Seroprevalence of Anaplasma marginale in Texas cattle. Prev Vet Med 2014; 116: 188-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.05.008
  16. Khezri M. Seroprevalence of Anaplasma infection in sheep and cattle in Kurdistan province of Iran with an overview of one decades of its epidemiological status in Iran. JSRR 2015; 6: 26-36. https://doi.org/10.9734/JSRR/2015/15535
  17. Szweda W, Siemionek J, Lipinska E, Blaszczak U, Michalowska M. Prevalence survey of Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle in the Warmia and Mazury region of Poland by competitive ELISA MSP-5. Med Weter 2011; 67: 838-842 (in Polish).
  18. Urdaz-Rodriguez JH, Fosgate GT, Alleman AR, Rae DO, Donovan GA, Melendez P. Seroprevalence estimation and management factors associated with high herd seropositivity for Anaplasma marginale in commercial dairy farms of Puerto Rico. Trop Anim Health Prod 2009; 41: 1439-1448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9332-9
  19. Sharma A, Singla LD, Kaur P, Bal MS. PCR and ELISA vis-a-vis microscopy for detection of bovine anaplasmosis: a study on associated risk of an upcoming problem in North India. Scientific-WorldJournal 2015; 2015: 352519.
  20. Lee SH, Jung BY, Kwak D. Evidence of Anaplasma spp. exposure in native Korean goats (Capra hircus coreanae). Vet Med 2015; 60: 248-252.
  21. Rather SA, Tak H, Kakru DK. Seroprevalence of Babesia bigemina and Anaplasma marginale in domestic animals of district Ganderbal. Sci J Vet Adv 2016; 5: 74-79.
  22. Guerra M, Walker E, Jones C, Paskewitz S, Cortinas MR, Stancil A, Beck L, Bobo M, Kitron U. Predicting the risk of Lyme disease: habitat suitability for Ixodes scapularis in the north central United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8: 289-297. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0803.010166
  23. Walker DH. Changing dynamics of human-rickettsial interactions. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2016; 94: 3-4. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.15-0762
  24. Fang LQ, Liu K, Li XL, Liang S, Yang Y, Yao HW, Sun RX, Sun Y, Chen WJ, Zuo SQ, Ma MJ, Li H, Jiang JF, Liu W, Yang XF, Gray GC, Krause PJ, Cao WC. Emerging tick-borne infections in mainland China: an increasing public health threat. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15: 1467-1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00177-2

피인용 문헌

  1. 최근 10년간 국내 소 질병 원인체에 관한 문헌적 고찰 vol.43, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2020.43.3.113