Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine (정신신체의학)

Korean Psychosomatic Society (한국정신신체의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Complementarity between SDQ-SR and MMPI-A in Assessing Adolescents with Internalizing Disorder : A Preliminary Study

내재화장애 청소년의 평가에서 자기보고용 강점난점척도와 MMPI-A의 상호보완성 : 예비연구

  • Shin, Kyo Jung (Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Joung Sook (Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Jee Young (Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jin Hee (Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine)
  • 신교정 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 안정숙 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 임지영 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 이진희 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 정신건강의학교실)
  • Received : 2017.11.04
  • Accepted : 2018.04.28
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives : The aims of this study were to investigate the psychopathology in adolescents with internalizing disorder using the self-report version of Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-SR) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory for adolescents (MMPI-A), and to explore the complementarity between these two inventories for diagnostic assessment. Methods : Ninety-one patients aged 13-17 were divided into two groups by clinical diagnosis, 44 with internalizing disorder and 47 comparison group with other disorders. The data of SDQ-SR and MMPI-A completed by them were analyzed for the ability to predict internalizing disorder. Results : The logistic regression analysis revealed that diagnostic predictability increased by 2.27 times with every 1 point of SDQ-SR emotional symptom score increment. Comparison of ROC curves for internalizing disorders showed that the SE and SP of SDQ-SR emotional symptom with score over 4 was 88.94 and 78.72, respectively. For A-anx of MMPI-A with score over 56, SE and SP was 77.27 and 74.47, respectively. However, combination of these scales could not enhance the predictability of diagnostic classification more than that of SDQ-SR emotional symptom alone. Conclusions : Emotional symptom scale of SDQ-SR and A-anx, A-aln, A and INTR of MMPI-A should be important subscales for diagnosing the internalizing disorder of adolescents, however, which needs to be examined further with a larger sample size including normal control group.

연구목적 청소년의 내재화장애는 겉으로 표출되지 않으므로 의료서비스 이용을 결정하는 부모나 교사가 그 증상을 인지하기 어렵고 청소년 자신도 정신의학적 개입을 기피하는 경향이 있어 치료 기회를 놓치기 쉽다. 본 연구는 내재화장애 청소년의 정신병리를 자기보고식 강점난점설문지(SDQ-SR)와 MMPI-A를 사용하여 조사하고, 이 두 검사도구가 내재화장애를 진단평가하는데 상호보완성이 있는지를 규명하고자 시행되었다. 방 법 청소년 외래환자(13~17세) 91명을 임상진단에 따라 두 집단으로 나누었으며, 내재화장애집단 44명과 그 외 임상진단을 가진 비교집단 47명이 완성한 SDQ-SR과 MMPI-A 자료가 내재화장애 진단을 어느 정도로 예측할 수 있는지 분석하였다. 결 과 로지스틱 회귀분석 결과, SDQ-SR의 정서증상 소척도가 1점 상승할 때 내재화장애의 진단예측력은 2.27배 증가하였다. 또한 ROC 곡선분석에서, SDQ-SR 정서장애 소척도의 절단점수를 4점으로 했을 때 내재화장애진단의 민감도와 특이도가 각각 88.94와 78.72로 나타났다. MMPI-A에서는 A-anx 절단점수가 56이었을 때 민감도와 특이도는 각각 77.27과 74.47이었다. 그러나 이 두 검사도구 소척도들의 어떠한 조합도 SDQ-SR 정서증상 소척도가 갖는 진단예측력을 더 높이지는 못했다. 결 론 본 연구에서는 청소년의 내재화장애를 진단하는데 SDQ-SR의 정서증상과 MMPI-A의 A-anx, A-aln, A 및 INTR가 중요한 소척도임을 알 수 있었으나 이를 확정하기 위해서는 정상대조군을 포함한 대규모의 연구가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. WHO. Adolescents and Mental Health. Available at: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/topics/adolescence/mental_health/en. Accessed Sep 01, 2017.
  2. Adelman HS, Taylor L. Mental health in schools and public health. Public Health Rep 2006;121:294-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335490612100312
  3. Kim NH, Lim KY, Chung YK, Noh JS, Kim HS, Shin KM, Shin YM. Sociodemographic characteristics and emo- tional and behavioral factors associated with perceived need and use of adolescent mental health services in Korea. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2012;51:409-415. https://doi.org/10.4306/jknpa.2012.51.6.409
  4. Meltzer H, Gatward R, Goodman R, Ford T. Mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain. Int Rev Psychiatry 2003;15:185-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954026021000046155
  5. Sawyer MG, Arney FM, Baghurst PA, Clark JJ, Graetz BW, Kosky RJ, Nurcombe B, Patton GC, Prior MR, Raphael B. The mental health of young people in Australia: key fndings from the child and adolescent component of the national survey of mental health and well-being. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2001;35:806-814. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2001.00964.x
  6. Seoul Child Adolescent Mental Health. Report on the Prevalence Rate of Pediatric Mental Disorders in Seoul, 2005. Available at: http://childyouth.blutouch.net/contents/body.asp
  7. Zwaanswijk M, Verhaak PF, Bensing JM, Van der Ende J, Verhulst FC. Help seeking for emotional and behavioural problems in children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003;12:153-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-003-0322-6
  8. Kim NH, Lim KY, Chung YK, Noh JS, Kim HS, Shin KM, Shin YM. Sociodemographic characteristics and emo- tional and behavioral factors associated with perceived need and use of adolescent mental health services in Korea. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2012;51:409-415. https://doi.org/10.4306/jknpa.2012.51.6.409
  9. Bhang SY, Yoo HI, Kim JH, Kim BS, Bahn GH, Ahn DH, Suh DS, Cho SC, Hwang JW, Lee YS. Revision of Adolescent Mental Health and Problem Behavior Screening Ques- tionnaire: Development of Adolescent Mental Health and Problem Behavior Screening Questionnaire-II. J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;22:271-286. https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.2011.22.4.271
  10. Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H. Using the Strengths and Diffculties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Int Rev Psychiatry 2003;15:166-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954026021000046128
  11. Svedin CG, Priebe G. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a screening instrument in a community sample of high school seniors in Sweden. Nord J Psychiatry 2008;62:225-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039480801984032
  12. He JP, Burstein M, Schmitz A, Merikangas KR. The Strengths and Diffculties Questionnaire (SDQ): the factor structure and scale validation in U.S. adolescents. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2013;41:583-595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9696-6
  13. Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V. The strengths and diffculties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self- report version. Int Rev Psychiatry 2003;15:173-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954026021000046137
  14. Roongpraiwan R, Efron D, Sewell J, Mathai J. Comparison of mental health symptoms between children attending developmental/behavioural paediatric clinics and child and adolescent mental health service. J Paediatr Child Health 2007;43:122-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01030.x
  15. Hathaway SR, McKinley JC. The Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory manual. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesoata Press;1983.
  16. Butcher JN, Williams CL, Graham JR, Archer RP, Tellegen A, Ben-Porath YS, Kaemmer B. Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-adolescent. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press;1992.
  17. Handel RW, Archer RP, Elkins DE, Mason JA, Simonds-Bisbee EC. Psychometric properties of the Minnesota Multi- phasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent (MMPI-A) clinical, content, and supplementary scales in a forensic sample. J Pers Assess 2011; 93:566-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.608752
  18. Choi HJ, Park KH. An Investigation into psychological typology and gender differences in adolescent delinquency using MMPI-A profle patterns. Studies on Korean Youth 2012; 23:175-199.
  19. Kim JS, Han KH, Lim JY, Lee JY, Min BB, Moon KJ. Korean MMPI-2 user manual. Seoul, Korea: Maumsarang; 2005.
  20. Achenbach TM, Edelbrock CS. The classifcation of child psychopathology: a review and analysis of empirical efforts. Psychol Bull 1978;85:1275-1301. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.6.1275
  21. Kim MH, Ahn JS, Min SH. Psychometric properties of the self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Korea. Psychiatry Investig 2015;12:491-499. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2015.12.4.491
  22. Vostanis P. Strengths and Diffculties Questionnaire: research and clinical applications. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2006 Jul;19: 367-372. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.yco.0000228755.72366.05
  23. Sperandei S. Understanding logistic regression analysis. Biochemia Medica 2014;24:12-18.
  24. Archer R. MMPI-A: Assessing adolescent psychopathology: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.;1997.
  25. Lim JY. A study on the utility of the Korean MMPI-A in ado- lescent psychological assessment. Stud Korean Youth 2008; 19:193-213.
  26. Goodman A, Lamping DL, Ploubidis GB. When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised fve subscales on the Strengths and Diffculties Questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2010;38:1179-1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9434-x
  27. Lee SA, Kim KH, Yook KH. Utility of K-CBCL and MMPI- A in evaluation and diagnosis of adolescents with internalizing or externalizing disorders. Korean J Clin Psychol 2012;31:391-399. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2012.31.1.020
  28. Lewinsohn PM, Hops H, Roberts RE, Seeley JR, Andrews JA. Adolescent psychopathology: I. Prevalence and incidence of depression and other DSM-III-R disorders in high school students. J. Abnorm. Psychol 1993;102:133-144. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.102.1.133
  29. Bagby RM, Marshall MB, Basso MR, Nicholson RA, Bacchiochi J, Miller LS. Distinguishing bipolar depression, major depression, and schizophrenia with the MMPI-2 clinical and content scales. J Pers Assess 2005;84:89-95. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_15
  30. Lim J, Han K. Use of the MMPI-A with Korean psychiatric adolescent sample: Preliminary investigation. Korean J Clin Psychol 2004;23:755-769.
  31. Kopper BA, Osman A, Osman JR, Hoffman J. Clinical utility of the MMPI-A content scales and Harris-Lingoes subscales in the assessment of suicidal risk factors in psychiatric adolescents. J Clin Psychol 1998;54:191-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199802)54:2<191::AID-JCLP8>3.0.CO;2-V
  32. Stokes J, Pogge D, Sarnicola J, McGrath R. Correlates of the MMPI-A Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) facet scales in an adolescent inpatient sample. J Pers Assess 2009;91:48-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484167
  33. Goodman R, Ford T, Corbin T, Meltzer H. Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) multi-informant algorithm to screen looked after children for psychiatric disorders. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004;13:25-31.
  34. Archer RP. Future directions for the MMPI-A: research and clinical issues. J Pers Assess 1997;68:95-109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6801_8
  35. Rinaldo JCB, Baer RA. Incremental validity of the MMPI- A content scales in the prediction of self-reported symptoms. J Pers Assess 2003;80:309-318. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8003_08
  36. Rubio-Stipec M, Fitzmaurice G, Murphy J, Walker A. The use of multiple informants in identifying the risk factors of depressive and disruptive disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2003;38:51-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-003-0600-0