Korean Journal of Agricultural Science (농업과학연구)

Institute of Agricultural Science, CNU (충남대학교 농업과학연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of supplemental glycerol polyethylene glycol ricinoleate in different energy density diets on the growth performance, blood profiles, nutrient utilization, and excreta gas emission of broilers: focus on dietary glycerol polyethylene glycol ricinoleate in broilers

  • Yin, Jia (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Yun, Hyeok Min (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, In Ho (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2017.09.27
  • Accepted : 2018.02.05
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of glycerol polyethylene glycol ricinoleate (GPGR) supplementation in different energy density diets on the growth performance, blood profiles, excreta gas emission, and total tract apparent retention (TTAR) of nutrients in broilers. A total of 544 one-day-old male Ross broilers were used in a 35-day trial. The broilers were allocated into one of four treatment groups in a $2{\times}2$ factorial arrangement with two levels of energy densities (a normal energy or decreased energy density) and GPGR (0 and 0.035%). From day 18 to 35, the GPGR supplemented and normal energy density diet groups showed a significantly improved (p < 0.05) body weight gain (BWG). Meanwhile, the GPGR supplemented diet group had a significantly reduced (p < 0.05) feed conversion ratio (FCR) compared to that of the non-supplemented diet group. From day 0 to 35, the GPGR supplemented diet and the normal energy density diet groups had a significantly increased (p < 0.01) BWG and a reduced (p < 0.01) FCR. Moreover, GPGR supplementation tended to increase (p < 0.1) the TTAR of the dry matter (DM) compared with the non-supplemented diets. Likewise, the normal energy density diets had a significantly improved TTAR for the gross energy (GE) (p < 0.05) than that of the decreased energy density diets. No interactive effects were observed between the energy density and GPGR supplemented diets. In conclusion, both dietary GPGR supplementation and normal energy density diets had beneficial effects on the growth performance of broiler chickens without any adverse effects on blood profiles and excreta gas emission.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2005. Official methods of analysis, 18th Ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  2. Azman MA, Konar V, Seven PT. 2004. Effects of different dietary fat sources on growth performances and carcass fatty acid composition of broiler chicken. Revue de Medecine Veterinaire 5:278-286.
  3. Boguslawska-Tryk M, Piotrowska A, Szymeczko R, Burlikowska K. 2016. Effect of dietary lignocellulose on ileal and total tract digestibility of fat and fatty acids in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 100:1050-1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12476
  4. Bontempo V, Comi M, Jiang XR. 2016. The effects of a novel synthetic emulsifier product on growth performance of chickens for fattening and weaned piglets. Animal 10:592-597. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115002189
  5. Corduk M, Ceylan N, Ildiz F. 2007. Effects of dietary energy density and L-carnitine supplementation on growth performance, carcass traits and blood parameters of broiler chickens. South African Journal of Animal Science 37:65-73.
  6. Dierick NA, Decuypere JA. 2004. Influence of lipase and/or emulsifier addition on the ileal and faecal nutrient digestibility in growing pigs fed diets containing 4% animal fat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84:1443-1450. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1794
  7. Hidalgo MA, Dozier WA, Davis AJ, Gordon RW. 2004. Live performance and meat yield responses of broilers to progressive concentrations of dietary energy maintained at a constant metabolizable energy-to-crude protein ratio. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 13:319-327. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/13.2.319
  8. Jansen M, Nuyens F, Buyse J, Leieu S, Campenhout LV. 2015. Interaction between fat type and lysolecithin supplementation in broiler feeds. Poultry Science 94:2506-2515. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev181
  9. Kaczmarek SA, Bochenek M, Samuelsson AC. 2015. Effects of glyceryl polyethylene glycol ricinoleate on nutrient utilisation and performance of broiler chickens. Archives of Animal Nutrition 69:285-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2015.1061722
  10. Meng QW, Yan L, Ao X, Zhou TX, Wang JP, Lee JH, Kim IH. 2010. Influence of probiotics in different energy and nutrient density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, and blood characteristics in growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 88:3320-3326. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2308
  11. Moritz JS, Cramer KR, Wilson KJ, Beyer RS. 2003. Feed manufacture and feeding of rations with graded levels of added moisture formulated to different energy densities. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 12:371-381. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/12.3.371
  12. NRC 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  13. Olukosi OA, Adeola O. 2008. Whole body nutrient accretion, growth performance and total tract nutrient retention responses of broilers to supplementation of xylanase and phytase individually or in combination in wheat-soybean meal based diets. The Journal of Poultry Science 45:192-198. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.45.192
  14. Patra AK, Samanta G, Pal K. 2011. Effects of an emulsifier on the performances of Khaki Campbell ducks added with different sources of fats. Frontiers of Agriculture in China 5:605-611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-011-1141-z
  15. Rabie MH, Szilagyi M. 1998. Effects of L-carnitine supplementation of diets differing in energy levels on performance, abdominal fat content, and yield and composition of edible meat of broilers. British Journal of Nutrition 80:391-400. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114598001457
  16. Ravindran V, Tancharoenrat P, Zaefarian F, Ravindran G. 2016. Fats in poultry nutrition: Digestive physiology and factors influencing their utilisation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 213:1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.01.012
  17. Roy A, Haldar S, Mondal S, Ghosh K. 2010. Effects of supplemental exogenous emulsifier on performance, nutrient metabolism, and serum lipid profile in broiler chickens. Veterinary Medicine International 10:1-9.
  18. SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2001. SAS User's Guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  19. Saunders DR, Sillery J. 1976. Lecithin inhibits fatty acid and bile salt absorption from rat small intestine in vivo. Lipids 11:830-832. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02532987
  20. Soares M, Lopez-Bote CJ. 2002. Effects of dietary lecithin and fat unsaturation on nutrient utilisation in weaned piglets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 95:169-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00324-8
  21. Tancharoenrat P, Ravindran V, Zaefarian F, Ravidran G. 2013. Influence of age on the apparent metabolisable energy and total tract apparent fat digestibility of different fat sources for broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 186:186-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.013
  22. Tang MY, Ma QG, Chen XD, Ji C. 2007. Effects of dietary metabolizable energy and lysine on carcass characteristics and meat quality in Arbor Acres broilers. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 20:1865-1873. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1865
  23. Tan HS, Zulkifli I, Farjam AS, Goh YM, Croes E, Partha SK, Tee AK. 2016. Effect of exogenous emulsifier on growth performance, fat digestibility, apparent metabolisable energy in broiler chickens. Journal of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology 4:7-10.
  24. Udomprasert P, Rukkwamsuk T. 2006. Effect of an exogenous emulsifier on growth performance in weanling pigs. Kasetsart Journal 40:652-656.
  25. Van der Heijden M, de Haan D. 2010. Optimising moisture while maintaining feed quality. All About Feed 1:29-31.
  26. Wang JP, Zhang ZF, Yan L, Kim IN. 2016. Effects of dietary supplementation of emulsifier and carbohydrase on the growth performance, serum cholesterol and breast meat fatty acids profile of broiler chickens. Animal Science Journal 87:250-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12412
  27. Williams CH, David DJ, Iismaa O. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The Journal of Agricultural Science 59:381-385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960001546X
  28. Zaefarian F, Romero LF, Ravindran V. 2015. Influence of high dose of phytase and an emulsifier on performance, apparent metabolisable energy and nitrogen retention in broilers fed on diets containing soy oil or tallow. British Poultry Science 56:590-597.
  29. Zhang B, Haitao L, Zhao D, Guo Y, Barri A. 2011. Effect of replacing lysophospha- tidylecholine addition to broiler diets on performance, apparent digestibility of fatty acids, and apparent metabolizable energy content. Animal Feed Science and Technology 163:177-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.10.004
  30. Zosangpuii AK, Samanta G. 2015. Inclusion of an emulsifier to the diets containing different sources of fats on performances of Khaki Campbell ducks. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research 16:156-160.