DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of SNS Advertisement Characteristics on Advertisement Attitude and WOM through Users' Psychological Factors

SNS 광고특성이 이용자의 심리적 요인을 통해 광고태도 및 구전의도에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2018.05.23
  • Accepted : 2018.06.28
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

Purpose As the number of SNS users increases, the importance of SNS advertisement is also increasing. Thus, the purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of factors on effectiveness of SNS advertising, and expand research on users' attitude and behavior intention toward SNS advertising. Design/methodology/approach This study was designed to examine the structural relationships among SNS service attribute, users' cognitive characters, psychological factors, users' attitude and behavior intention toward SNS advertising. Concretely, SNS service attribute was presented as online interactivity, and users' cognitive characters were presented as perceived relevance and perceived intrusiveness. In addition, psychological factors were presented as presence experience and message credibility, users' attitude toward SNS advertising was presented as advertisement attitude and users' behavior intention was presented as WOM. Findings The results showed that online interactivity has a positive effect on presence experience and message credibility, but perceived intrusiveness has a negative effect on presence experience and message credibility. Perceived relevance has a positive effect on presence experience, but does not have significant effect on message credibility. Presence experience and message credibility have positive effects on advertisement attitude and WOM, and advertisement attitude also has a positive effect on WOM. Based on the results from this study, academic and practical implications can be drawn. First, the study extended the scope of research about SNS advertising through focusing on SNS service attribute and SNS users' cognitive characters and identified the relationship between presence experience, message credibility, advertisement attitude and WOM. Second, the results of this research can provide practical guidelines to develop effective advertising strategies for companies which promoting SNS as a marketing tool.

Keywords

References

  1. 구동모, "SPSS, LISREL, PLS 및 PROCESS를 활용한 기초, 조절․매개효과 분석을 위한연구방법론," 학현사. 2013.
  2. 권상희, 강영희, "인터넷미디어의 상호작용성 이 라디오방송 제작방식에 미치는 영향 연구," 사이버커뮤니케이션학보, 제11 권, 2003, pp. 5-44.
  3. 김기영, 허영욱, "외식소비자 구전정보의 송수 신 커뮤니케이션 상호작용이 수용성과 구전효과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구," 산업경제연구, 제1권, 제24호, 2011, pp. 991-1025.
  4. 김병수, 김효은, 김대길, 우려의, "SNS 사용자 들의 지속 사용과 정보 공유에 영향을 미치는 선행 요인의 차이: 듀얼 팩터 모형을 중심으로," 정보시스템연구, 제4권, 제25호, 2016, pp. 1-21.
  5. 김은희, 유승엽, "인터넷 기사의 맥락과 주목도 가광고태도와 기업이미지에 미치는 효과," 디지털융복합연구, 제10권, 제4호, 2012, pp. 129-136. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.4.129
  6. 김재휘, 김태훈, "인터넷 광고 혼잡도가 광고효과에 미치는 영향: 배너광고의 수와 침입성을 중심으로," 광고학연구, 제4권, 제12호, 2001, pp. 97-114.
  7. 김재휘, 김용환, "인터넷 광고의 침입성과 관여가 광고 효과에 미치는 영향," 광고연구, 제6호, 2003.
  8. 김하림, 조창환. "정보원의 사회적 거리감에 따른 기업 페이스북 페이지에서의 광고효과: 메시지의 노골적 설득 의도, 규범적 대인민감성, 정보적 대인민감성의 조절효과를 중심으로," 광고학연구, 제5권, 제25호, 2014, pp. 7-42.
  9. 김헌, 백미정, "소셜 네트워크 서비스의 유형별 분류에 따른 웹 인터페이스 연구," 한국디자인문화학회지, 제1권, 제16호, 2010, pp. 80-93.
  10. 마정미, "정보통제와 텔레프레즌스를 중심으로 본 인터랙티브 광고의 효과과정에 관한 연구," 광고학연구, 제4권, 제13호, 2002, pp. 155-182.
  11. 박현선, 김상현, "SNS 스트레스와 이용의도 저하에 관한 연구," 정보시스템연구, 제2권, 제24호, 2015, pp 53-72.
  12. 손달호, 김경숙. "SNS 피로감 및 부정적 느낌이 SNS 중단의도에 미치는 영향," 정보시스템연구, 제2권, 제25호, 2016, pp. 111-129.
  13. 송민정, "양방향 서비스의 주요 특징인 상호작용성 (Interactivity) 의 이론적 개념화," 한국언론학보, 제3권, 제46호, 2002, pp. 116-152.
  14. 이지원, 강인원, 정성운, "SNS 상의 콘텐츠품질이 사용자의 수용태도와 구전활동에 미치는 영향," 지식경영연구, 제5권, 제12호, 2011, pp. 1-10.
  15. 주용완, 이계남, 최영준, 윤은정, "2017 인터넷 이용실태조사," 한국인터넷진흥원, 2018.
  16. 한은경, 임수현, "소셜 미디어의 신뢰도가 광고효과에 미치는 영향광고 신뢰도의 매개효과를 중심으로," 광고연구, 제92호, 2012, pp. 7-29.
  17. Baek, Tae Hyun, and Mariko Morimoto. "Stay away from me." Journal of advertising41(1) 2012, pp. 59-76. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367410105
  18. Bagozzi, Richard P., and Youjae Yi. "On the evaluation of structural equation models." Journal of the academy of marketing science Vol.1, No.16, 1988, pp. 74-94.
  19. Barfield, Woodrow, et al. "Presence and performance within virtual environments." Virtual environments and advanced interface design, 1995, pp. 473-513..
  20. Bentler, Peter M., and Douglas G. Bonett. "Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures." Psychological bulletin, Vol.3, No.88, 1980,
  21. Boyd, Danah, Scott Golder, and Gilad Lotan. "Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter." System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, 2010.
  22. Browne, Michael W., and Robert Cudeck. "Alternative ways of assessing model fit." Sage focus editions 154 ,1993, pp. 136-136.
  23. Chatterjee, Patrali. "Online reviews: do consumers use them?." 2001.
  24. Chen, Shipin, Yongfeng Diao, and Jianpin Zhang. "Social media: Communication characteristics and application value in distance education." Electrical and Control Engineering (ICECE), 2011 International Conference on. IEEE, 2011.
  25. Cheung, Christy MK, Matthew KO Lee, and Neil Rabjohn. "The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities." Internet research, Vol.3, No.18, 2008, pp. 229-247.
  26. Cho, Hyunyi, and Franklin J. Boster. "First and third person perceptions on anti-drug ads among adolescents." Communication Research, Vol.2, No.35, 2008, pp. 169-189.
  27. Coyle, James R., and Esther Thorson. "The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites." Journal of advertising, Vol.3, No.30, 2001, pp. 65-77.
  28. Digital Democracy Survey, "A multi-generational View of Consumer Technology", Media and Telecom Trends. 2014
  29. Dong, Xuebing, Yaping Chang, and Xiaojun Fan. "Effects of the characteristics of online multimedia synergy on consumers' message acceptance and message response." Online Information Review, Vol.5, No.41, 2017, pp. 710-727
  30. Edwards, Steven M., Hairong Li, and Joo-Hyun Lee. "Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads." Journal of Advertising Vol.3, No.31, 2002, pp. 83-95.
  31. Everett, R. O. G. E. R. S. "Communication Technology: The New Media in Society." 1986.
  32. Fornell, Claes, and David F. Larcker. "Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics." Journal of marketing research, 1981, pp. 382-388.
  33. Goldfarb, Avi, and Catherine Tucker. "Privacy and innovation." Innovation policy and the economy Vol.1, No.12, 2012, pp. 65-90.
  34. Hair, Joseph F., et al. Multivariate data analysis. Vol. 5. No. 3. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall, 1998.
  35. Heeter, Carrie. "Being there: The subjective experience of presence." Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments Vol.2, No.1, 1992, pp. 262-271.
  36. Hennig‐Thurau, Thorsten, et al. "Electronic word‐of‐mouth via consumer opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?." Journal of interactive marketing Vol.1, No.18, 2004, pp. 38-52.
  37. Hoffman, Donna L., and Thomas P. Novak. "Marketing in hypermedia computermediated environments: Conceptual foundations." The Journal of Marketing 1996, pp. 50-68.
  38. Hoffman, Donna L., Thomas P. Novak, and Patrali Chatterjee. "Commercial scenarios for the web: opportunities and challenges." Journal of computermediated communication, Vol.3, No.1, 1995, JCMC136.
  39. Homer, Pamela M. "The mediating role of attitude toward the ad: Some additional evidence." Journal of Marketing Research, 1990, pp. 78-86.
  40. Jensen, Jakob D., et al. "Why are tailored messages more effective? A multiple mediation analysis of a breast cancer screening intervention." Journal of Communication Vol.5, No.62, 2012, pp. 851-868.
  41. Jin, Xiao-Ling, et al. "How to keep members using the information in a computersupported social network." Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.5, No.25, 2009, pp. 1172-1181.
  42. Kaplan, Andreas M., and Michael Haenlein. "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media." Business horizons, Vol.1, No.53, 2010, pp. 59-68.
  43. Kim, Taeyong, and Frank Biocca. "Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion." Journal of computermediated communication, Vol.2, No.3, 1997, JCMC325.
  44. Kreuter, Matthew W., and Ricardo J. Wray. "Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance." American journal of health behavior, Vol.1, No.27, 2003, S227-S232.
  45. Kreuter, Matthew W., et al. Tailoring health messages: Customizing communication with computer technology. Routledge, 2013.
  46. Kwak, Haewoon, et al. "What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?." Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 2010.
  47. Laczniak, Russell N., Thomas E. DeCarlo, and Sridhar N. Ramaswami. "Consumers' Responses to Negative Word‐of Mouth Communication: An Attribution Theory Perspective." Journal of consumer Psychology, Vol.1, No.11, 2001, pp. 57-73.
  48. Lee, Kwan Min. "Presence, explicated." Communication theory, Vol.1, No.14, 2004. pp. 27-50.
  49. Li, Hairong, Terry Daugherty, and Frank Biocca. "Impact of 3-D advertising on product knowledge, brand attitude, and purchase intention: The mediating role of presence." Journal of advertising, Vol.3, No.31, 2002, pp. 43-57.
  50. Li, Ting, and Till Unger. "Willing to pay for quality personalization? Trade-off between quality and privacy." European Journal of Information Systems, Vol.6, No.21, 2012, pp. 621-642.
  51. Loda, Marsha D., and Barbara Carrick Coleman. "Sequence matters: A more effective way to use advertising and publicity." Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.4. No.45, 2005, pp. 362-372.
  52. Lombard, Matthew, and Jennifer Snyder-Duch. "Interactive advertising and presence: A framework." Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol.2, No.1, 2001, pp. 56-65.
  53. MacKenzie, Scott B., Richard J. Lutz, and George E. Belch. "The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations." Journal of marketing research, 1986, pp. 130-143.
  54. Mangalindan, M. "Web ads on the rebound." Wall Street Journal, No.25, 2003.
  55. McMillan, Sally J., and Jang-Sun Hwang. "Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity." Journal of advertising, Vol.3, No.31, 2002, pp. 29-42.
  56. Morris, Meredith Ringel, Jaime Teevan, and Katrina Panovich. "A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks." ICWSM No.10, 2010, pp. 23-26.
  57. Nunnally, Jum C. "Bernstein. IH (1994)." Psychometric theory 3, 1994.
  58. Okazaki, Shintaro, and Maria Jesus Yague. "Responses to an advergaming campaign on a mobile social networking site: An initial research report." Computers in Human Behavior Vol.1, No.28, 2012, pp. 78-86.
  59. Postma, Oeds J., and Marlon Brokke. "Personalisation in practice: The proven effects of personalisation." Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management Vol.2, No.9, 2002, pp. 137-142.
  60. Rafaeli, Sheizaf, and Fay Sudweeks. "Networked interactivity." Journal of computer-mediated communication Vol.4, No.2, 1997, JCMC243.
  61. Sanders, Irwin Taylor. The community. New York: Ronald Press Company, 1975.
  62. Sharethrough., "Native Advertising Software For Publishers", 2017.
  63. Sledgianowski, Deb, and Songpol Kulviwat. "Using social network sites: The effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context." Journal of Computer Information Systems Vol.4, No.49, 2009, pp. 74-83.
  64. Speck, Paul Surgi, and Michael T. Elliott. "Predictors of advertising avoidance in print and broadcast media." Journal of Advertising Vol.3, No.26, 1997, pp. 61-76.
  65. Srinivasan, Srini S., Rolph Anderson, and Kishore Ponnavolu. "Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequences." Journal of retailing Vol.1, No.78, 2002, pp. 41-50.
  66. Statista, https://www.statista.com/, 2018.
  67. Steuer, Jonathan. "Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence." Journal of communication Vol.4, No.42, 1992, pp. 73-93.
  68. Sundar, S. Shyam. "Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction." Oxford handbook of internet psychology. 2007.
  69. Sutanto, Juliana, et al. "Addressing the Personalization-Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Assessment from a Field Experiment on Smartphone Users." Mis Quarterly Vol.4, No.37, 2013.
  70. Taylor, David G., Jeffrey E. Lewin, and David Strutton. "Friends, fans, and followers: do ads work on social networks?: how gender and age shape receptivity." Journal of advertising research Vol.1, No.51, 2011, pp. 258-275.
  71. Turow, Joseph, et al. "Americans reject tailored advertising and three activities that enable it.", 2009.
  72. Witmer, Bob G., and Michael J. Singer. "Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire." Presence Vol.3, No.7, 1998, pp. 225-240.
  73. Wojdynski, Bartosz W., and Nathaniel J. Evans. "Going native: Effects of disclosure position and language on the recognition and evaluation of online native advertising." Journal of Advertising Vol.2, No.45, 2016, pp. 157-168.
  74. Xu, Heng, et al. "The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for locationaware marketing." Decision support systems Vol.1, No.51, 2011, pp. 42-52.
  75. Zhong, Bu, Marie Hardin, and Tao Sun. "Less effortful thinking leads to more social networking? The associations between the use of social network sites and personality traits." Computers in Human Behavior Vol.3, No.27, 2011, pp. 1265-1271.