International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AUV hull lines optimization with uncertainty parameters based on six sigma reliability design

  • Hou, Yuan hang (Transportation Equipment and Ocean Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University) ;
  • Liang, Xiao (Transportation Equipment and Ocean Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University) ;
  • Mu, Xu yang (Transportation Equipment and Ocean Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University)
  • Received : 2017.03.03
  • Accepted : 2017.10.05
  • Published : 2018.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV), which are becoming more and more important in ocean exploitation tasks, needs energy conservation urgently when sailing the complex mission path in long time cruise. As hull lines optimization design becomes the key factor, which closely related with resistance, in AUV preliminary design stage, uncertainty parameters need to be considered seriously. In this research, Myring axial symmetry revolution body with parameterized expression is assumed as AUV hull lines, and its travelling resistance is obtained via modified DATCOM formula. The problems of AUV hull lines design for the minimum travelling resistance with uncertain parameters are studied. Based on reliability-based optimization design technology, Design For Six Sigma (DFSS) for high quality level is conducted, and is proved more reliability for the actual environment disturbance.

Keywords

References

  1. Apostolos, Papanikolaou, Mohammed, Alfred, Hirdaris, Spyros E., 2014. Stochastic uncertainty modelling for ship design loads and operational guidance. Ocean Eng. 86, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.01.014
  2. Ba-Abbad, Mazen A., Nikolaidis, Efstratios, Kapania, Rakesh K., 2015. New approach for system reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J. 129 (44), 1087-1096.
  3. De Barros, Pascoal, De Sa, A., 2008. Investigation of a method for predicting AUV derivatives. Ocean Eng. 35, 1627-1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.08.008
  4. Campana, Emilio F., 2015. High-fidelity global optimization of shape design by dimensionality reduction, metamodels and deterministic particle swarm. Eng. Optim. 47 (4), 473-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2014.895340
  5. Diez, Matteo, Peri, Daniele, 2009. Global optimization algorithms for robust optimization in naval design. In: 8th International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Technology in the Maritime Industries. COMPIT.
  6. Diez, Matteo, Peri, Daniele, 2010. Robust optimization for ship conceptual design. Ocean Eng. 37, 966-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.03.010
  7. Diez, Matteo,Wei, H.E., Campana, Emilio F., 2014. Uncertainty quantification of Delft catamaran resistance, sinkage and trim for variable Froude number and geometry using metamodels, quadrature and KarhuneneLoeve expansion. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 19, 143-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-013-0235-0
  8. Fang-yi, L.I., Jian-hua, R.O.N.G., Lin, H.U., Feng-ling, L.I., Ji-jun, Y.I., 2016. Reliabilitybased optimization design of structure subjected to vehicle frontal impact based on probability-convex hybrid model. J. Vib. Shock 35 (3), 215-219.
  9. Guo-qing, X.I.A., Cai-yun, L.I.U., Xing-hua, C.H.E.N., 2016. Multi-objective optimization for AUV conceptual design based on NSGA-II. Oceans 1-6.
  10. Hannapel, Shari, Vlahopoulos, Nickolas, 2010. Introducing uncertainty in multidiscipline ship design. Nav. Eng. J. 122 (2), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2010.00267.x
  11. Joung, Taehwan, Sammut, Karl, He, Fangpo, Lee, Seungkeon, 2009. A study on the design optimization of an AUV by using computational fluid dynamic analysis. In: The Nineteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
  12. Leotardi, Cecilia, Campana, Emilio F., Diez, Matteo, 2015. On the use of uncertainty quantification in variable-accuracy simulation-based multidisciplinary optimization. In: 3rd Workshop on Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Fluid Dynamics.
  13. Oliveira Junior, Hime Aguiar e, Ingber, Lester, Petraglia, Antonio, Petraglia, Mariane Rembold, Machado, Maria Augusta Soares, 2012. Adaptive simulated annealing. Intell. Syst. Ref. Libr. 35 (5), 33-62.
  14. Richard, Dahoo Pierre, Pougnet, Philippe, Hami, Abdelkhalak El, 2016. Reliabilitybased Design Optimization[M]//Nanometer-scale Defect Detection Using Polarized Light. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp. 25-45.
  15. Rubio-Solar, Manuel, Vega-Rodriguez, Miguel A., Sanchez Perez, Juan Manuel, Gomez-Iglesias, Antonio, Cardenas-Montes, Miguel, 2008. A FPGA optimization tool based on a multi-island genetic algorithm distributed over grid environments. In: Eighth IEEE International Symposium on CLUSTER Computing and the Grid. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 65-72.
  16. Sebastian, Koziolek, Derlukiewicz, Damian, 2012. Method of assessing the quality of the design process of construction equipment with the use of DFSS (design for Six Sigma). Autom. ConStruct. 22 (4), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.07.006
  17. Vasudev, Lakshmi, Kondeti, 2014. Optimization design framework for AUVs using GA. In: International Conference on Systemics, Cybernatics, and Informatics.
  18. Wei, H.E., Diez, Matteo, Zao-jian, Z.O.U., Campana, Emilio F., Stern, Frederick, 2013. URANS study of Delft catamaran total/added resistance, motions and slamming loads in head sea including irregular wave and uncertainty quantification for variable regular wave and geometry. Ocean Eng. 74, 189-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.020
  19. Yan-xia, S.U.N., Guo-yuan, Q.I., 1967. Chaotic particle swarm optimization. In: Topics in Optimization. Academic Press, pp. 4460-4493.

Cited by

  1. Design, Construction, and Control for an Underwater Vehicle Type Sepiida vol.39, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0263574720000739