DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Endophytic Microbial Community in Kiwifruit Plant Cultivars

  • Cho, Gyeongjun (Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus), Institute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Min-jung (Department of Plant Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kwon, Youngho (Department of Southern Area Crop Science, Paddy Crop Research division, RDA) ;
  • Kwak, Youn-Sig (Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus), Institute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2017.12.31
  • Accepted : 2018.03.28
  • Published : 2018.08.01

Abstract

The microbiome makes a significant contribution to plant health and endophytes may generate positive effects for the host. However, there is a limited knowledge available concerning the kiwifruit endophyte. Therefore, we discuss endophyte microbiome community structures among the kiwifruit cultivars. Total reads numbered 17620 in cv. Hayward, 11515 in cv. Haegeum and 13613 in cv. Jecygold. The number of OTUs was follows: 112 in cv. Hageum; and 87 in cvs. Hayward and Jecygold. Most of the identified OTUs were phylum Proteobacteria and it emerged that Actinobacteria, Firmicute and Bacteroidetes were mainly present. While the largest difference in Proteobacteria content is between cv. Haegeum and cv. Jecygold, they shared more OTUs than cv. Hayward. As well, this study revealed the presence of remarkably dominated OTU of Pseudomonas spp. in kiwifruit sap regardless of cultivars. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first tone to investigate the kiwifruit endophyte-microbiome community.

Keywords

References

  1. Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A. and Holmes, S. P. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13:581-583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869
  2. Chanway, C. P. 1996. Endophytes: they're not just fungi! Can. J. Bot. 74:321-322. https://doi.org/10.1139/b96-040
  3. Ferguson, A. R. 2011. Kiwifruit: Evolution of a crop. Acta Hortic. 913:31-42.
  4. Frank, A., Saldierna Guzman, J. and Shay, J. 2017. Transmission of bacterial endophytes. Microorganisms 5:70. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5040070
  5. Hallmann, J., Quadt-Hallmann, A., Mahaffee, W. F. and Kloepper, J. W. 1997. Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops.
  6. Kim, G. H., Song, K. I., Koh, Y. J., Jung, J. S., Cho, Y. S. and Kim, K. H. 2015. Reactions of Korean new cultivar 'haegeum' against major diseases of kiwifruit. Acta Hortic. 1096:403-408.
  7. Kim, G. H., Jung, J. S. and Koh, Y. J. 2017. Occurrence and epidemics of bacterial canker of kiwifruit in Korea. Plant Pathol. J. 33:351-361. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.RW.01.2017.0021
  8. Mansfeld, J., Genin, S., Magori, S., Citovsky, V., Sriariyanum, M., Ronald, P., Dow, M., Verdier, V., Beer, S. V., Machado, M. A., Toth, I., Salmond, G. and Foster, G. D. 2012. Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13:614-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x
  9. Matsumoto, A. and Takahashi, Y. 2017. Endophytic actinomycetes: promising source of novel bioactive compounds. J. Antibiot. 70:514-519. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2017.20
  10. Moyes, A. B., Kueppers, L. M., Pett-Ridge, J., Carper, D. L., Vandehey, N., O'Neil, J. and Frank, A. C. 2016. Evidence for foliar endophytic nitrogen fxation in a widely distributed subalpine conifer. New Phytol. 210:657-668. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13850
  11. Naylor, D., DeGraaf, S., Purdom, E. and Coleman-Derr, D. 2017. Drought and host selection infuence bacterial community dynamics in the grass root microbiome. ISME J. 11:2691-2704. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.118
  12. Rosen, M. J., Callahan, B. J., Fisher, D. S. and Holmes, S. P. 2012. Denoising PCR-amplified metagenome data. BMC Bioinformatics 13:283. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-283
  13. Vanneste, J. L. 2017. The scientifc, economic, and social impacts of the New Zealand outbreak of bacterial canker of kiwifruit (Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae). Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 55:377-399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035530