DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficacy of an LED toothbrush on a Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilm on a sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface: an in vitro study

  • Lee, Hae (Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Gun (Department of Periodontology, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Um, Heung-Sik (Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Chang, Beom-Seok (Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Si Young (Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Kwan (Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2018.05.04
  • Accepted : 2018.06.03
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of a newly devised toothbrush with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) on Porphyromonas gingivalis attached to sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surfaces. Methods: The study included a control group, a commercial photodynamic therapy (PDT) group, and 3 test groups (B, BL, and BLE). The disks in the PDT group were placed in methylene blue and then irradiated with a diode laser. The B disks were only brushed, the BL disks were brushed with an LED toothbrush, and the BLE disks were placed into erythrosine and then brushed with an LED toothbrush. After the different treatments, bacteria were detached from the disks and spread on selective agar. The number of viable bacteria and percentage of bacterial reduction were determined from colony counts. Scanning electron microscopy was performed to visualize bacterial alterations. Results: The number of viable bacteria in the BLE group was significantly lower than that in the other groups (P<0.05). Scanning electron microscopy showed that bacterial cell walls were intact in the control and B groups, but changed after commercial PDT and LED exposure. Conclusions: The findings suggest that an LED toothbrush with erythrosine treatment was more effective than a commercial PDT kit in reducing the number of P. gingivalis cells attached to surface-modified titanium in vitro.

Keywords

References

  1. Lindhe J, Meyle J; Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology. Peri-implant diseases: consensus report of the sixth European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:282-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01283.x
  2. Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:286-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01274.x
  3. Mombelli A, Muller N, Cionca N. The epidemiology of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 6:67-76.
  4. Figuero E, Graziani F, Sanz I, Herrera D, Sanz M. Management of peri-implant mucositis and periimplantitis. Periodontol 2000 2014;66:255-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12049
  5. Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000 1998;17:63-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00124.x
  6. Serino G, Strom C. Peri-implantitis in partially edentulous patients: association with inadequate plaque control. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:169-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01627.x
  7. Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Severino M, Gatto R, Monaco A. Periodontitis, implant loss and peri-implantitis. A meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:e8-16.
  8. Dalago HR, Schuldt Filho G, Rodrigues MA, Renvert S, Bianchini MA. Risk indicators for Peri-implantitis. A cross-sectional study with 916 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:144-50.
  9. Zhuang LF, Watt RM, Mattheos N, Si MS, Lai HC, Lang NP. Periodontal and peri-implant microbiota in patients with healthy and inflamed periodontal and peri-implant tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:13-21.
  10. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent RL Jr. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:134-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02419.x
  11. Perez-Chaparro PJ, Duarte PM, Shibli JA, Montenegro S, Lacerda Heluy S, Figueiredo LC, et al. The Current Weight of Evidence of the Microbiologic Profile Associated With Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review. J Periodontol 2016;87:1295-304. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.160184
  12. Subramani K, Jung RE, Molenberg A, Hammerle CH. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:616-26.
  13. Komerik N, Nakanishi H, MacRobert AJ, Henderson B, Speight P, Wilson M. In vivo killing of Porphyromonas gingivalis by toluidine blue-mediated photosensitization in an animal model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:932-40. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.47.3.932-940.2003
  14. Wainwright M. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT). J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;42:13-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/42.1.13
  15. Alwaeli HA, Al-Khateeb SN, Al-Sadi A. Long-term clinical effect of adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in periodontal treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci 2015;30:801-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1426-y
  16. Fukui M, Yoshioka M, Satomura K, Nakanishi H, Nagayama M. Specific-wavelength visible light irradiation inhibits bacterial growth of Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Periodontal Res 2008;43:174-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2007.01009.x
  17. Feuerstein O, Persman N, Weiss EI. Phototoxic effect of visible light on Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum: an in vitro study. Photochem Photobiol 2004;80:412-5. https://doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2004)080<0412:PEOVLO>2.0.CO;2
  18. Song HH, Lee JK, Um HS, Chang BS, Lee SY, Lee MK. Phototoxic effect of blue light on the planktonic and biofilm state of anaerobic periodontal pathogens. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013;43:72-8. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2013.43.2.72
  19. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17 Suppl 2:68-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x
  20. Bollen CM, Papaioanno W, Van Eldere J, Schepers E, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:201-11. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070302.x
  21. Berglundh T, Gotfredsen K, Zitzmann NU, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Spontaneous progression of ligature induced peri-implantitis at implants with different surface roughness: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:655-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01397.x
  22. Louropoulou A, Slot DE, Van der Weijden F. The effects of mechanical instruments on contaminated titanium dental implant surfaces: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1149-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12224
  23. Salvi GE, Ramseier CA. Efficacy of patient-administered mechanical and/or chemical plaque control protocols in the management of peri-implant mucositis. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2015;42 Suppl 16:S187-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12321
  24. Park JB, Koh M, Jang YJ, Choi BK, Kim KK, Ko Y. Removing bacteria from rough surface titanium discs with chlorhexidine and additional brushing with dentifrice. Gerodontology 2016;33:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12106
  25. Park JB, Kim N, Ko Y. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:1552-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31825e3ba6
  26. Deppe H, Mucke T, Wagenpfeil S, Kesting M, Sculean A. Nonsurgical antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in moderate vs severe peri-implant defects: a clinical pilot study. Quintessence Int 2013;44:609-18.
  27. Okamoto K, Nakayama K, Kadowaki T, Abe N, Ratnayake DB, Yamamoto K. Involvement of a lysinespecific cysteine proteinase in hemoglobin adsorption and heme accumulation by Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Biol Chem 1998;273:21225-31. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.33.21225
  28. Smalley JW, Silver J, Marsh PJ, Birss AJ. The periodontopathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis binds iron protoporphyrin IX in the mu-oxo dimeric form: an oxidative buffer and possible pathogenic mechanism. Biochem J 1998;331:681-5. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3310681
  29. Soukos NS, Som S, Abernethy AD, Ruggiero K, Dunham J, Lee C, et al. Phototargeting oral blackpigmented bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:1391-6. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.4.1391-1396.2005
  30. Soukos NS, Stultz J, Abernethy AD, Goodson JM. Phototargeting human periodontal pathogens in vivo. Lasers Med Sci 2015;30:943-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1497-9
  31. Habiboallah G, Mahdi Z, Mahbobeh NN, Mina ZJ, Sina F, Majid Z. Bactericidal effect of visible light in the presence of erythrosine on Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum compared with diode laser, an in vitro study. Laser Ther 2014;23:263-71.
  32. Wang J, Liu Z, Liu J, Liu S, Shen W. Study on the interaction between fluoroquinolones and erythrosine by absorption, fluorescence and resonance Rayleigh scattering spectra and their application. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2008;69:956-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2007.05.057
  33. Metcalf D, Robinson C, Devine D, Wood S. Enhancement of erythrosine-mediated photodynamic therapy of Streptococcus mutans biofilms by light fractionation. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;58:190-2. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl205
  34. Fekrazad R, Mirmoezzi A, Kalhori KA, Arany P. The effect of red, green and blue lasers on healing of oral wounds in diabetic rats. J Photochem Photobiol B 2015;148:242-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.04.018

Cited by

  1. Antimicrobial effect of toothbrush with light emitting diode on dental biofilm attached to zirconia surface: an in vitro study vol.35, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2019.35.3.160
  2. How can biophotonics help dentistry to avoid or minimize cross infection by SARS-CoV-2? vol.37, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102682