Korean Journal of Environmental Biology (환경생물)

Korean Society of Environmental Biology (한국환경생물학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genetic Difference Analysis and Environmental Assessment of Miscanthus sinensis and Phragmites australis to Apply Regional Seed for Restoration in Korea

복원 소재로서 지역 종자 적용을 위한 억새와 갈대의 유전적 변이분석

  • Hong, Sun Hee (Department of Plant Life & Environment Science, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Hankyoung National University) ;
  • Park, Sang Yong (Department of Plant Resources, College of Industrial Science, Kongju National University) ;
  • Min, Kyeoung Do (Department of Plant Resources, College of Industrial Science, Kongju National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae Yoon (Department of Plant Resources, College of Industrial Science, Kongju National University)
  • 홍선희 (한경대학교 식물생명환경과학과) ;
  • 박상용 (공주대학교 식물자원학과) ;
  • 민경도 (공주대학교 식물자원학과) ;
  • 김재윤 (공주대학교 식물자원학과)
  • Received : 2018.10.26
  • Accepted : 2018.10.29
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Restoration ecology is the practical study of renewing and restoring a spoilt, degraded, or devastated ecosystems in the environment. Because the Korean industry has been drastically developed for the past few decades, the Korean ecosystem requires restoration using regional seed. In this study, we identified the variation of phylogenic relationship of Miscanthus sinensis or Phragmites australis by locations in Korea. Chloroplast DNA atpF-H and psbA-trnH interspace region were used as a molecular marker to resolve the phylogenic relationship in 10 different locations. We performed the molecular phylogenetic analysis with 10 chloroplast DNAs from each location using Kimura 2-parameter. The analysis of Miscanthus showed that all atpF-H genes were exact matches except for Ose san. In contrast to Mischanthus, the atpF-H genes from Phragmites were observed to have more variation. A total of 7 locations revealed the variation in chloroplast gene. According to the phylogenic tree in Phragmites, 2 of 10 samples in 6 locations and 3 of 10 in 1 location showed variation with 0.160-0.181 genetic distance. According to the genetic distance of the Miscanthus sinensis, there were no mutations in all regions except the Hongsung. These results support regional differences and show the necessity for seed collection by region. In the case of Phragmites australis, genetic variation occurred in all regions.

본 연구는 국내 염습지 해안 복원의 주요 식물인 갈대와 내건성 대표 식물인 억새의 지역별 유전자형 분석을 통해 지역별 복원종자 적용에 대한 타당성을 검증고자 하는 연구로서, SNP를 활용한 근연관계 분석 결과 억새는 홍성군 집단이 다른 지역과 상이한 유전적 변이를 보인 반면, 갈대는 모든 지역에서 동시다발적인 변이양상이 나타낸다. 이를 통하여 억새의 경우 우리나라 전역에 발생하는 건조지에서 억새시료를 사용할 때는 지역별로 수집한 종자를 활용하는 것이 합리적이나 부득이하게 다른 지역의 식물 자원을 사용한다고 해도 유전적인 교란이 크게 발생하지 않을것으로 보인다. 갈대의 경우 전 지역에서 유전적 변이가 다양하며 억새에 비하여 유전적 변이가 상대적으로 많이 나타나고 있기 때문에 염류 피해지의 복원에 활용할 수 있는 자원인 갈대의 경우 종자를 지역별로 수집하기 위한 다양한 인프라를 구축하여 향후 복원 사업에 대비하여야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bakker JP, R van Diggelen, RM Bekker and RH Marrs. 2012. Restoration of dry grasslands and heathlands. pp. 173-187. In Restoration Ecology: The New Frontier (van Andel J and J Aronson eds.). John Wiley & Sons. New Jersy.
  2. Becker U, G Colling, P Dostal, A Jakobsson and D Matthies. 2006. Localadaptation in the monocarpic perennial Carlina vulgaris at different spatial scales across Europe. Oecologia 150:506-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0534-9
  3. Bower AD, JBS Clair and V Erickson. 2014. Generalized provisional seed zones for native plants. Ecol. Appl. 24:913-919.
  4. De Kort H, J Mergeay, K Vander Mijnsbrugge, G Decocq, S Maccherini, HH Kehlet Bruun, O Honnay and K Vandepitte. 2014. An evaluation of seed zone delineation using phenotypic and population genomic data on black alder Alnus glutinosa. J. Appl. Ecol. 51:1218-1227.
  5. Dobson AP, AD Bradshaw and AJM Baker. 1997. Hopes for the future: restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277:515-522.
  6. Fenster CB and MR Dudash. 1994. Genetic considerations for plant population restoration and conservation. pp. 34-62. In Restoration of endangered species: conceptual issues, planning and implementation (Bowles ML, CJ Whelan eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  7. Hobbs RJ and DA Norton. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor. Ecol. 4:93-110.
  8. Hong JK, CJ Yang, SH Oh and YM Lee. 2014a. Molecular phylogenetic study of section Sabina (Genus Juniperus) in Korea based on chloroplast DNA matK and psbA-trnH sequences data. Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 44:51-58.
  9. Hong JK, CJ Yang, YM Lee and JH Kim. 2014b. Molecular phylogenetic study of Pinus in Korea based on chloroplast psbA-trnH and atpF-H sequences data. Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 44:111-118.
  10. Hamilton NRS. 2001. Is local provenance important in habitat creation? A reply. J. Appl. Ecol. 38:1374-1376.
  11. Hufford KM and SJ Mazer. 2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:147-155.
  12. Jorgensen MH, A Elameen, S Klemsdal and S Fjellheim. 2014. Use of molecular markers for defining site specific seed material for restoration in Norway. pp. 57-74. In Guidelines for Native Seed Production and Grassland Restoration (Kiehl A, A Kirmer, N Shaw and S Tischew eds.). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  13. Joshi J, B Schmid, MC Caldeira, PG Dimitrakopoulos, J Good, R Harris, A Hector, K Huss-Danell, A Jumpponen, A Minns, CPH Mulder, JS Pereira, A Prinz, M Scherer-Lorenzen, ASD Siamantziouras, AC Terry, AY Troumbis and JH Lawton. 2001. Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecol. Lett. 4:536-544.
  14. Jones TA. 2003. The restoration gene pool concept: beyond the native versus non-native debate. Restor. Ecol. 7:42-50.
  15. Kiehl K, A Kirmer, S Tischew and N Shaw. 2014. Guidelines for Native Seed Production and Grassland Restoration. pp. 2-11. (Kiehl K, A Kirmer and N Shaw eds.). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  16. Kim NC, HY Kim and MY Choi. 2015. The study on the utilization of soil seed bank for the restoration of original vegetation. J. Korea Soc. Environ. Restor. Technol. 18:201-214.
  17. Kim JY, JC Moon, HY Kim, S Shin, K Song, KH Kim and BM Lee. 2017. Identification of downy mildew resistance gene candidates by positional cloning. Appl. Plant Sci. 5:P1600132.
  18. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
  19. Leimu R and M Fischer. 2008. A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS One 3:e4010.
  20. Lesica P and FW Allendorf. 1999. Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: mix or match? Restor. Ecol. 7:42-50.
  21. Malaval S, B Lauga, CR Roger and G Largier. 2010. Combined definition of seed transfer guidelines for ecological restoration in the French Pyrenees. Appl. Veg. Sci. 13:113-124.
  22. McKay JK, CE Christian, S Harrison and KJ Rice. 2005. "How local is local?"-A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restor. Ecol. 13:432-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00058.x
  23. MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC.
  24. Miller SA, A Bartow, M Gisler, K Ward, AS Young and TN Kaye. 2011. Can an ecoregion serve as a seed transfer zone? Evidence from a common garden study with five native species. Restor. Ecol. 19:268-276.
  25. Montalvo AM and NC Ellstrand. 2000. Transplantation of the subshrub Lotus scoparius: testing the home-site advantage hypothesis. Conserv. Biol. 14:1034-1045.
  26. Montalvo AM and NC Ellstrand. 2001. Nonlocal transplantation and outbreeding depression in the subshrub Lotus scoparius (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88:258-269.
  27. Park BJ, SC Kim, WT Kim, YH Yoon, YH Cho, HK Kang, HK Oh, KJ Shin, YJ Eo, TS Yoon, KE Jang and MY Kwak. 2012. Density and species composition of soil seed bank in rural stream topsoil. J. Environ. Sci. 21:1419-1424.
  28. Raven PH. 2002. Science, sustainability, and the human prospect. Science 297:954-958.
  29. Reisch C. 2007. Genetic structure of Saxifraga tridactylites (Saxifragaceae) from natural and man-made habitats. Conserv. Genet. 8:893-902.
  30. Rice KJ and NC Emery. 2003. Managing microevolution: restoration in the face of global change. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9:469-478.
  31. Schmitt J and SE Gamble. 1990. The effect of distance from the parental site on offspring performance and inbreeding depression in Impatiens capensis: a test of the local adaptation hypothesis. Evolution 44:2022-2030.
  32. Schoen DJ and AHD Brown. 2001. The conservation of wild plant species in seed banks attention to both taxonomic coverage and population biology will improve the role of seed banks as conservation tools. Bioscience 51:960-966.
  33. St Clair JB, FF Kilkenny, RC Johnson, NL Shaw and G Weaver. 2013. Genetic variation in adaptive traits and seed transfer zones for Pseudoroegneria spicata (bluebunch wheatgrass) in the northwestern United States. Evol. Appl. 6:933-948.
  34. Vander Mijnsbrugge K, A Bischoff and B Smith. 2010. A question of origin: where and how to collect seed for ecological restoration. Basic Appl. Ecol. 11:300-311.
  35. Vitousek PM, HA Mooney, J Lubchenco and JM Melillo. 1997. Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science 277:494-499.