DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Xenogenic Bone Plate and Screw using Finite Element Analysis

  • Heo, Su-young (BK 21 Plus Program and College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-bin (College of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences) ;
  • Kim, Nam-soo (BK 21 Plus Program and College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2017.11.20
  • Accepted : 2018.06.02
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of xenogenic bone plate system (equine bone) using a three-dimensional finite element ulna fracture model. The model was used to calculate the Von Mises stress (VMS) and stress distribution in fracture healing periods with metallic bone plate and xenogenic bone plate systems, which are installed while the canine patient is standing. Bone healing rate (BHR) (0%) and maximum VMS of the xenogenic plate was similar to the yield strength of equine bone (125 MPa). VMS at the ulna and fracture zones were higher with the xenogenic bone plate than with the metallic bone plate at BHRs of 0% and 1%. Stress distributions in fracture zone were higher with the xenogenic bone plate than the metallic bone plate. This study results indicate that the xenogenic bone plate may be considered more beneficial for callus formation and bone healing than the metallic bon plate. Xeonogenic bone plate and screw applied in clinical treatment of canines may provide reduced stress shielding of fractures during healing.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdullah J, Rushdan A, Hamzah M, Ariff A R, Rani A. (1999) Use of bovine xenograft in reconstruction of traumatic anterior cranial fossa bone defects involving the frontal sinus. Ann Transplant 1999; 4: 28-31.
  2. Alberts LR, Pao YC, Lippiello L. (1993) A large-deformation, finite-element study of chondrodiatasis in the canine distal femoral epiphyseal plate. J Biomech 1993; 26: 1291-1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90353-G
  3. An YH, Draughn RA. Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface, Boca Raton: CRC Press. 2000: 43-64.
  4. Benli S, Aksoy S, Havitcioglu H, Kucuk M. Evaluation of bone plate with low-stiffness material in terms of stress distribution. J Biomech 2008; 41: 3229-3235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.003
  5. Carter DR, Blenman PR, Beaupre GS. Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing. J Orthop Res 1988; 6: 736-748. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100060517
  6. Claes L. The mechanical and morphological properties of bone beneath internal fixation plates of differing rigidity. J Orthop Res 1989; 7: 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100070203
  7. Claes LE, Heigele CA, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Kaspar D, Seidl W, Margevicius KJ, Augat P. Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 355: S132-147.
  8. Cordey J, Borgeaud M, Perren SM. Force transfer between the plate and the bone: relative importance of the bending stiffness of the screws friction between plate and bone. Injury 2000; 3: C21-28.
  9. Dehghani SN, Bigham AS, Torabi Nezhad S, Shafiei Z. Effect of bovine fetal growth plate as a new xenograft in experimental bone defect healing: radiological, histopathological and biomechanical evaluation. Cell Tissue Bank 2008; 9:91-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-008-9062-7
  10. Ferguson SJ, Wyss UP, Pichora DR. Finite element stress analysis of a hybrid fracture fixation plate. Med Eng Phys 1996; 18: 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/1350-4533(95)00041-0
  11. Haje DP, Volpon JB, Moro CA. Bovine bone screws: metrology and effects of chemical processing and ethylene oxide sterilization on bone surface and mechanical properties. J Biomater Appl 2009; 23: 453-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328208092110
  12. Liebschner MA. Biomechanical considerations of animal models used in tissue engineering of bone. Biomaterials 2004; 5: 1697-1714.
  13. Rikli DA, Curtis R, Schilling C, Goldhahn J The potential of bioresorbable plates and screws in distal radius fracture fixation. Injury 2002; 33: 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00136-5
  14. Saidpour SH (2006) Assessment of carbon fibre composite fracture fixation plate using finite element analysis. Ann Biomed Eng 2006; 34: 1157-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-006-9102-z
  15. Salci H, Sarigul S, Dogan S, Lekesiz H, Ozcan R, Gorgul OS, Aksoy K. Contribution of the xenograft bone platescrew system in lumbar transpedicular stabilization of dogs: an in-vitro study. J Vet Sci 2008; 9: 193-196. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2008.9.2.193
  16. Slatis P, Karaharju E, Holmstrom T, Ahonen J, Paavolainen P. Structural changes in intact tubular bone after application of rigid plates with and without compression. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60: 516-522. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197860040-00014
  17. Slatter DH. Textbook of small animal surgery, 3th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 2003; 1785-1792.
  18. Tonino AJ, Davidson CL, Klopper PJ, Linclau LA. Protection from stress in bone and its effects. Experiments with stainless steel and plastic plates in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1976; 58: 107-113.
  19. Uhthoff HK, Dubuc FL. Bone structure changes in the dog under rigid internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1971; 81: 165-170. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197111000-00026
  20. Wander KW, Schwarz PD, James SP, Powers BE, Taylor B, Wimsatt JH (2000) Fracture healing after stabilization with intramedullary xenograft cortical bone pins: a study in pigeons. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.2000.5608
  21. Woo SL, Akeson WH, Coutts RD, Rutherford L, Doty D, Jemmott GF, Amiel D. A comparison of cortical bone atrophy secondary to fixation with plates with large differences in bending stiffness. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58: 190-195. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197658020-00005
  22. Woo S L, Lothringer KS, Akeson WH, Coutts RD, Woo YK, Simon BR, Gomez MA. Less rigid internal fixation plates: historical perspectives and new concepts. J Orthop Res 1984; 1: 431-449.