DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accounting Conservatism and Excess Executive Compensation

회계 보수주의와 경영자 초과보상

  • 변설원 (부산대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 박상봉 (동의대학교 상경대학 회계학과)
  • Received : 2018.04.04
  • Accepted : 2018.06.18
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

This study examines the negative relationship between accounting conservatism and excess executive compensation and examines whether their relationship increases as managerial incentive compensation intensity increases. For this purpose, a total of 2,755 company-years were selected for the analysis of the companies listed on the Korea Stock Exchange from December 2012 to 2016 as the final sample. The results of this study are as follows. First, there is a statistically significant negative relationship between accounting conservatism and manager overpayment. This implies that managers' incentives to distort future cash flow estimates by over booking assets or accounting profits in order to maximize their compensation when manager compensation is linked to firm performance. In this sense, accounting conservatism can reduce opportunistic behavior by restricting managerial accounting choices, which can be interpreted as a reduction in overpayment to managers. Second, we found that the relationship between accounting conservatism and excess executive compensation increases with the incentive compensation for accounting performance. The higher the managerial incentive compensation intensity of accounting performance is, the more likely it is that the manager has the incentive to make earnings adjustments. Therefore, the high level of incentive compensation for accounting performance means that the ex post settling up problem due to over-compensation can become serious. In this case, the higher the managerial incentive compensation intensity for accounting performance, the greater the role and utility of conservatism in manager compensation contracts. This study is based on the fact that it presents empirical evidence on the usefulness of accounting conservatism in managerial compensation contracts theoretically presented by Watts (2003) and the additional basis that conservatism can be used as a useful tool for investment decision.

본 연구는 회계 보수주의와 경영자 초과보상 사이의 음(-)의 관련성을 분석하고 이들의 관계가 회계성과에 대한 경영자 유인보상 강도가 높을수록 증가하는지에 대해 살펴본다. 이를 위해 2012년부터 2016년까지 한국 증권거래소의 상장기업 중 12월 결산 제조업만을 대상으로 총 2,755기업-연도를 최종 표본으로 분석에 활용하였다. 본 연구의 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 회계보수주의와 경영자 초과보상은 통계적으로 유의적인 음(-)의 관련성이 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 이는 경영자 보상이 기업성과와 연계될 경우 경영자는 자신의 보상을 극대화하기 위해 자산이나 회계이익의 과대계상을 통하여 미래 현금흐름 추정치를 왜곡할 유인을 가진다. 이에 대해 회계 보수주의가 경영자의 회계선택을 제한하여 기회주의적 행위를 감소시킬 수 있기 때문에 경영자에게 지급되는 초과보상 역시 감소한 것으로 해석할 수 있다. 둘째, 회계보수주의와 경영자 초과보상의 음(-)의 관련성은 회계성과에 대한 경영자 유인보상 강도가 높을수록 증가한다는 실증결과를 발견하였다. 회계성과에 대한 경영자 유인보상 강도가 높을수록 경영자는 자신의 보상을 극대화하고자 회계성과에 대한 이익조정 유인을 가지며 초과보상을 획득할 가능성이 높다. 따라서 회계성과에 대한 경영자 유인보상 강도가 높다는 것은 초과보상으로 인한 사후정산문제가 심각해질 수 있다는 점을 의미한다. 이 경우 회계성과에 대한 경영자 유인보상 강도가 높을수록 경영자 보상계약에 있어서 보수주의의 역할 및 유용성은 더욱 커질 것이므로 보수주의와 초과보상에 대한 음(-)의 관련성이 더욱 증가한 결과로 해석된다. 본 연구는 Watts(2003)에 의해 이론적으로 제시된 경영자 보상계약에 대한 회계보수주의의 유용성과 관련하여 실증적 증거를 제시했다는 측면과 보수주의가 정보이용자들의 투자의사결정에 유용한 도구로 활용될 수 있다는 추가적인 근거를 제시했다는 점에서 의미가 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김새로나.양동훈.조광희(2011), "대리인비용과 보수주의 관련성," 회계학연구, 36(3), 65-102.
  2. 김선미.유승원(2011), "외부감사인 강제교체에 따른 보수주의 성향," 경영학연구, 40(5), 1211-1246.
  3. 김정옥.배길수(2006), "보수주의와 발생액," 회계저널, 18(1), 1-31.
  4. 라기례.박상봉(2013), "이익조정과 보수주의-적자회피기업과 Big-bath기업을 중심으로," 경영과 정보연구, 32(5), 261-285.
  5. 문상혁.박종국.신세나(2006), "정보비대칭에 따른 보수주의의 차별적 인식," 회계학 연구. 31, 215-242.
  6. 박현욱.김동재(2009), "회귀모형의 기울기에 대한 평행성 검증, 한국통계학회논문집, 16(1), 75-83.
  7. 백원선.박성진(2013), "기업수명주기, 수익비용대응 및 차별적 비용인식," 회계학연구, 38(2), 215-245.
  8. 신성욱(2013), "경영성과와 경영자현금보상 민감도," 경영과 정보연구, 32(1), 259-272.
  9. 성욱(2016), "기업지배구조 통제장치와 경영자 유인보상제도의 상호관련성," 경영과 정보연구, 35(1), 287-305.
  10. 최종서.이승태(2004), "경영자 보상과 보수주의," 한국회계학회발표논문.
  11. Ahmed, A. S., Duellman, S.(2007), "Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis," Journal of Accounting and Economics 43, 411-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.01.005
  12. Aoki, M.(1990), "Toward an economic model of the Japanese firm," Journal of Economic Literature 28, 1-27.
  13. Ball, R.(2001), "Infrastructure requirements for an economically efficient system of public financial reporting and disclosure," Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 127-169.
  14. Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., Robin, A.(2000), "The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics 29, 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00012-4
  15. Ball, R., Shivakumar, L.(2005), "Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness," Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 83-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.04.001
  16. Ball, R., Robin, A., Wu, J.S.(2003), "Incentives versus standards: Properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries," Journal of Accounting and Economics 36, 235-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.003
  17. Ball, R., Bushman, R. M., Vasvari, F.P.(2008), "The debt-contracting value of accounting information and loan syndicate structure," Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 247-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00273.x
  18. Basu, S.(1997), "The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1
  19. Beatty, A., Webber, J., Yu, J. J.(2008), "Conservatism and debt," Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45, 157-174.
  20. Beaver, W. H., Ryan, S. G.(2005), "Conditional and unconditional conservatism: Concepts and modeling," Review of Accounting Studies, 10, 269-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-1532-6
  21. Bushman, R. M., Piotroski, J. D.(2006), "Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting: the influence of legal and political institutions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42, 107-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.10.005
  22. Bushman, R., Engel, E., Smith, A.(2006), "An analysis of the relation between the stewardship and valuation roles of earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, 44, 53-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00192.x
  23. Cooper, M. J., Gulen, H., Rau, P. R.(2014), "Performance for pay? the relation between CEO incentive compensation and future stock price performance," The Relation between CEO Incentive Compensatoin and Future Stocck Price Performance (October 1, 2014)
  24. Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., Larcker, D.F.(1999), "Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance," Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 371-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00058-0
  25. Dechow, P. M.(2006), "Asymmetric sensitivity of CEO cash compensation to stock returns: A discussion," Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42, 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.11.001
  26. Demski, J. S., Sappington, D. E. M.(1999), "Summarization with errors: A perspective on empirical investigations of agency relationships," Management Accounting Research Res. 10, 21-37.
  27. Givoly, D., Hayn, C. K., Natarajan, A.(2007), "Measuring reporting conservatism," The Accounting Review, 82, 65-106. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.1.65
  28. Goldman, E., Slezak, S. L.(2006), "An equilibrium model of incentive contracts in the presence of income manipulation," Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 603-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.05.007
  29. Guay, W., Verrecchia, R.(2006). "Discussion of an economic framework for conservative accounting by Bushman and Piotroski (2006)," Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42, 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.03.003
  30. Healy, P. M.(1985). "The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions". Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 85-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(85)90029-1
  31. Huson, M. R., Tian, Y., Wiedman, C. I., Wier, H. A.(2012), "Compensation committees' treatment of earnings components in CEOs' terminal years," The Accounting Review, 87, 231-259. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10164
  32. Jensen, M. and W. Meckling(1976), "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Owernership Structur," Journal ofFinancial Economics, 3, 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  33. Jensen, Michael(1986), "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeover," American Economics Review, 76(2), 323-329.
  34. Iyengar, R. J., Zampelli, E. M.(2010), "Does accounting conservatism pay?," Accounting & Financance, 50, 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00325.x
  35. LaFond, R., Roychowdhury, S.(2008), "Managerial ownership and accounting conservatism," Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 101-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00268.x
  36. LaFond, R., Watts, R. L.(2008), "The information role of conservatism," The Accounting Review, 83, 447-478. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.447
  37. Leone, A. J., Wu, J. S., Zimmerman, J. L.(2006), "Asymmetric sensitivity of CEO cash compensation to stock returns," Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42, 167-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.04.001
  38. Milgrom, P., Roberts, J.(1992), Economic, Organization, and Management, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  39. Mitsudome, T., Weintrop, J., Hwang, L-S.(2008), "The relation between changes in CEO compensation and firm performance: A Japanese/American comparison," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 22(4), 605-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2007.06.001
  40. Murphy, K. J.(1998), Executive compensation, Working Paper, University of Southern California.
  41. Petersen, M. A.(2009), "Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches," Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435-480. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053
  42. Roychowdhury, S., Watts, R. L.(2007), "Asymmetric timeliness of earnings, market-to-book and conservatism in financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1-2), 2-31.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.12.003
  43. Ryan, S. G.(2006), "Identifying conditional conservatism," European Accounting Review, 15, 511-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180601102099

Cited by

  1. 동반성장 기업의 회계보수주의 수준 연구 vol.38, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.29214/damis.2019.38.1.009