Asia Marketing Journal

Korean Marketing Association (한국마케팅학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Impact of Salesperson Look-Brand Personality Congruence on Brand Affect: The Moderating Role of Social Anxiety

  • Lee, Heekyung (Seoul National University, College of Business Administration) ;
  • Yi, Youjae (Seoul National University, College of Business Administration)
  • Received : 2018.02.27
  • Accepted : 2018.08.09
  • Published : 2018.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Branded service encounters, in which various aspects of frontline employees are strategically aligned with the firm's brand positioning, can be achieved along several dimensions such as employee appearance, manner, and personality. While previous research has mainly focused on behavioral traits of employees, this research examines the employee's physical appearance in association with the brand personality trait across two studies. Study 1 shows that salesperson look-brand personality congruence enhances brand affect by inducing positive affect. Specifically, a brand-congruent look of a salesperson increases positive affect among customers by confirming their prior expectations about what a salesperson of a certain brand should look like as a brand representative. Study 2 reveals that the positive impact of salesperson look-brand personality congruence on brand affect is significant only for customers with high social anxiety whereas this effect disappears for those with low social anxiety. These findings extend previous research on branded service encounters by showing why and when frontline employees' physical appearance shapes customers' affective responses toward the brand.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Institute of Management Research, Seoul National University.

References

  1. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(8), 347-356.
  2. Aggarwal, P. (2004). The Effects of Brand Relationship Norms on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 87-101.
  3. Bagozzi, R. P. & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Antecedents and Purchase Consequences of Customer Participation in Small Group Brand Communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(1), 45-61.
  4. Barlow, J. & Stewart, P. (2004). Branded Customer Service: The New Competitive Edge. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  5. Bearden, W. O., Malhotra, K. M., & Uscategui, H. K. (1998). Customer Contact and the Evaluation of Service Experiences: Propositions and Implications for the Design of Services. Psychology & Marketing, 15(8), 793-809.
  6. Cacioppo, J. T., Glass, C. R., & Merluzzi, T. V. (1979). Self-Statements and Self-Evaluations: A Cognitive-Response Analysis of Heterosocial Anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3(3), 249-262.
  7. Chaudhuri, A. & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
  8. Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Collins Inc.
  9. Costrich, N., Feinstein, J., Kidder, L., Marecek, J., & Pascale, L. (1975). When Stereotypes Hurt: Three Studies of Penalties for SexRole Reversals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(6), 520-530.
  10. Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (2002). Perceived Entitativity, Stereotype Formation, and the Interchangeability of Group Members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1076-1094.
  11. Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and Private Self-Consciousness: Assessment and Theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 522-527.
  12. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373.
  13. Goodman, J. K., Cryder, E. C., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data Collection in a Flat World: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Mechanical Turk Samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213-224.
  14. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
  15. Huber, J. & McCann, J. (1982). The Impact of Inferential Beliefs on Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(3), 324-333.
  16. Ind, N. (2003). Inside Out: How Employees Build Value. Journal of Brand Management, 10(6), 393-402.
  17. Jackson, L. A. & Cash, T. F. (1985). Components of Gender Stereotypes: Their Implications for Inferences on Stereotypic and Nonstereotypic Dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(3), 326-344.
  18. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
  19. Krishna, A. (2016). A Clearer Spotlight on Spotlight: Understanding, Conducting and Reporting. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(3), 315-324.
  20. Kunda, Z. & Kathryn, C. O. (1995). Maintaining Stereotypes in the Face of Disconfirmation: Constructing Grounds for Subtyping Deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 565-579.
  21. Leary, M. R. (1983). Social Anxiousness: The Construct and Its Measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47(1), 66-75.
  22. Mitchell, C. (2002). Selling the Brand Inside. Harvard Business Review. 80(1), 99-101.
  23. Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867-872.
  24. Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management. Journal of Marketing, 50 (10), 135-145.
  25. Pounders, K. R., Babin, B. J., & Close, A. G. (2015). All the Same to Me: Outcomes of Aesthetic Labor Performed by Frontline Service Providers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(6), 670-693.
  26. Rafaeli, A., Dutton, J., Harquail, C. V., & Mackie-Lewis, S. (1997). Navigating by Attire: The Use of Dress by Female Administrative Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 9-45.
  27. Rao, A. R. & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 253-264.
  28. Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Cue Effects on Perceptions of Store Brand Quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 28-36.
  29. Schlenker, B. R. & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social Anxiety and Self-Presentation: A Conceptualization Model. Psychological Bulletin, 92(3), 641-669.
  30. Sirianni, N. J, Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., & Mandel, N. (2013). Branded Service Encounters: Strategically Aligning Employee Behavior with the Brand Positioning. Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 108-123.
  31. Spiller, S. A., Fitzsimons, G. J., Lynch, Jr. J. G., & McClelland, G. H. (2013). Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 277-288.
  32. Teas, R. K. & Agarwal, S. (2000). The Effects of Extrinsic Product Cues on Consumers' Perceptions of Quality, Sacrifice, and Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 278-290.
  33. Wan, L. C. & Wyer, R. S. (2015). Consumer Reactions to Attractive Service Providers: Approach or Avoid?. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(8), 578-595.
  34. Warhurst, C., Nickson, D., Witz, A., & Cullen, A. M. (2000). Aesthetic Labour in Interactive Service Work: Some Case Study Evidence from the 'New' Glasgow. Service Industries Journal, 20(3), 1-18.
  35. Weber, R. & Crocker, J. (1983). Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 961-977.
  36. Wentzel, D. (2009). The Effect of Employee Behavior on Brand Personality Impressions and Brand Attitudes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(3), 359-374.
  37. Wenzel, A. & Emerson, T. (2009). Mate Selection in Socially Anxious and Nonanxious Individuals. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28(3), 341-363.