DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk Analysis of Transporting Hazardous Substances in Harbor Using Modeling Program

항만에서 위험물 운송 중 유해화학물질 누출 위험성에 관한 연구

  • Yoon, Sukyoung (Dept of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Yun, Jayeon (Dept of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Han, Jiyun (Dept of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Jung, Seungho (Dept of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Ajou University)
  • 윤수경 (아주대학교 환경안전공학과) ;
  • 윤자연 (아주대학교 환경안전공학과) ;
  • 한지윤 (아주대학교 환경안전공학과) ;
  • 정승호 (아주대학교 환경안전공학과)
  • Received : 2017.11.29
  • Accepted : 2018.08.02
  • Published : 2018.08.31

Abstract

Recently, the use of hazardous chemicals has been continuously increasing. Therefore, the international trade volume is growing and chemical accidents have increased. Nowadays, the safety awareness of the public has increased. As a result, the management and supervision of hazardous chemicals have been strengthened. However, the port policy of Korea has focused on increasing the volume of cargo through facility development. Thus, the port management of hazardous chemicals has been relatively neglected. For national economic growth and society, the port management of hazardous chemicals should be considered to efficiently ensure safety and economic growth. Therefore, this study assumed scenarios where hazardous materials were moved in a dangerous container, not only on appropriate wharfs but also in ports that were close to a big city. The BTX substances were selected among the toxic chemicals with large import and export volumes, and the risk distance and damage effects were predicted using various risk assessment programs. It is expected that this could be used to improve a port safety management system and could be utilized to determine the safety distance in case of an accident.

Keywords

References

  1. American Industrial Hygiene Association(AIHA), 2016. Emergency Response Planning Guidelines.
  2. International Maritime Organization(IMO), 2014. IMDG Code.
  3. Kang, M.J., 2014. Planned Check / High Potential Tank Container Market. Monthly Maritime Korea, 488.
  4. Kang, S.J., Lee, I.M., Moon, J.Y., Chon, Y.W., 2017. Risk Analysis of Ammonia Leak in the Refrigeration Manufacturing Facilities. Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas, 21(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.7842/kigas.2017.21.1.43
  5. Kim, K.S., Son, C.Y., Shin, H.I., Lee, M.S., 1998. Structural Design of Cargo Handling System for the Yellow Sea Area. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 13(2), 18-25.
  6. Kim, S.S., 2015. Hazardous Chemical Accidents in Ports. Monthly Maritime Korea, 502.
  7. Kim, W.S., Choi, N.Y.H., Kim, D.H., 2016. A Study on the Improvement of Safety Management System for Dangerous Goods in Korean Ports. Korea Maritime Institute(KMI), 2016-12.
  8. Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency(KOSHA), 2017. Material Safety Data Sheet, Benzene, Toluene, Xylene.
  9. Korean Statistical Information Service(KOSIS), 2017. Statistical System. [Online] Available at [Accessed Sep 20, 2017].
  10. Lees, F.P., 1996. Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2nd Edition, Butterworths-Heinemann.
  11. Martins, M.R., Pestana, M.A., Souza, G.F.M., Schleder, A.M., 2016. Quantitative Risk Analysis of Loading and Offloading Liquefied Natural Gas(LNG) on a Floating Storage and Regasification Unit(FSRU). Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 43. 626-653.
  12. Meteorological Administration, 2017. Statistical System. [Online] Available at [Accessed Sep 20, 2017].
  13. Ministry of Environment, 2007. Final Report of the 3rd Chemical Distribution Survey. 11-1480000-000909-01.
  14. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, 2016. Loading and Unloading of Dangerous Goods Container in Port(Manual).
  15. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, 2017. Statistical System. [Online] Available at [Accessed Sep 21, 2017].
  16. National Fire Protection Association(NFPA), 2017. Standard System for the Identification of the Hazards of Materials for Emergency Response. NFPA 704.
  17. National Institute of Chemical Safety(NICS), 2015. ALOHA Guidelines. 2015-2.
  18. National Institute of Chemical Safety(NICS), 2016. Technical Guidelines for Selecting Accident Scenarios. 4.
  19. Oak, J.M., Kawg, Y.M., Hong, M.S., Jung, S.H., 2017. A Study on Safety Distance of Toxic Gas Leak Accident Using Hazard Modeling Program. Korean Journal of Hazardous Materials, 5(1), 83-89.
  20. Reference Manual Bevi Risk Assessments(RIVM), 2009. Module C Modeling the Specific Bevi Categories. 3.2.
  21. Uijt de Haag, P.A.M., Ale, B.J.M., 2005. Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment. CPR 18E, Purple Book, RVIM.
  22. Woo, Y.J., Lee, C.J., 2016. A study of Emergency Response for the Leakage Accident of Hazardous and Noxious Substances in a Port. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 31(6), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.6.32