DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of the Effects of Learning Stress for Inquiry Activities in College Earth Science Course

  • Cho, Jae-Hee (Department of Earth Science Education, Korean National University of Education) ;
  • Kim, Hak-Sung (Department of Earth Science Education, Korean National University of Education) ;
  • Shin, Hyun-Chul (Department of Chemical Science Education, Korean National University of Education)
  • Received : 2018.07.30
  • Accepted : 2018.08.24
  • Published : 2018.08.31

Abstract

This study analyzed variations of learning stress by comparing the salivary cortisol levels of students who participated in Earth Science inquiry activities. The cortisol concentrations between the pre- and post-inquiries of the sample of 34 university students, who had taken the course of 'Basic Earth Science and Experiments', were analyzed. The Earth Science inquiries consisted of geology and astronomy activities. The observational geology activities consisted of a session of 'structure contours and map patterns' and the cognitive astronomy activities consisted of a session of 'representations of horizontal and equatorial coordinates'. These Earth Science inquiry activities were found to cause students to have anxiety, and the thought processes that these activities involved were found to cause learning stress. The variations in cortisol concentrations of students increased by $1.6{\pm}5.9ng\;mL^{-1}$ after conducting observational activities in geology compared with $2.1{\pm}6.2ng\;mL^{-1}$ after doing cognitive activities in astronomy. The analysis of the observational activities in the geology inquiry activities indicated that they were consistent with low levels of learning stress. Conversely, the analysis of the cognitive activities in the astronomy inquiry activities showed significant individual variations in cortisol concentrations. Furthermore, individual differences in cognitive ability were reflected in the astronomy inquiry activities. While students, who received high scores, exhibited low levels of stress in the geology inquiry activities, they showed high levels of stress in the astronomy inquiry activities. It was concluded that, in the case of students with high scores in the study, the level of learning stress increased due to the raised anxiety in cognitive inquiry activities. In contrast, students, who received low scores in the study, exhibited high levels of stress in the geology inquiry activities, and low levels of stress in the astronomy inquiry activities.

Keywords

References

  1. Aardal, E. and Holm, A. C., 1995, Cortisol in salivareference ranges and relation to cortisol serum. European Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, 33, 927-932.
  2. Ahn, R. S., Lee, Y. J., Choi, J. Y., Kwon, H. B., and Chun, S. I., 2007, Salivary cortisol and DHEA levels in the Korean population: Age-related differences, diurnal rhythm, and correlations with serum levels. Yonsei medical journal, 48, 379-388. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2007.48.3.379
  3. Bergh, V. B. R. H., Calster, V. B., Puissant, S. P., and Huffel, V. S., 2008, Self-reported symptoms of depressed mood, trait anxiety and aggressive behavior in post-pubertal adolescents: Associations with diurnal cortisol profiles. Hormones and behavior, 54, 253-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.03.015
  4. Chandler, L. A. and Shermis, M. D., 1985, Assessing behavioral responses to stress. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 45, 825-844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485454013
  5. Chandola, T., Heraclides, A., and Kumari, M., 2010, Psychophysiological biomarkers of workplace stressors. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 31, 51-57.
  6. Chi, M. T. H., 2009, Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
  7. Clements, A. D. and Parker, C. R., 1998, The relationship between salivary cortisol concentrations in frozen versus mailed samples. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 613-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(98)00031-6
  8. Cohen, S., 1980, Aftereffects of stress on human performance and social behavior: A review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 82-108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.1.82
  9. DuBois, D. L., Felner, R. D., Brand, S., Adan, A. M., and Evans, E. G., 1992, A prospective study of life stress, social support, and adaptation in early adolescence. Child Development, 63, 542-557. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131345
  10. Glaser, K., 1982, National education association resolution on student stress. Today's Education, 71, 59.
  11. Goodyer, I. M., park, R. J., Netherton, C. M., and Herbert, H., 2001, Possible role of cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone in human development and psychopathology. British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.179.3.243
  12. Gunnar, M. R., Talge, N. M., and Herrera, A., 2009, Stressor paradigms in developmental studies: What does and does not work to produce mean increases in salivary cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 953-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.02.010
  13. Hellhammer, D. H., Wust, S., and Kudielka, B. M., 2009, Salivary cortisol as a biomarker in stress research. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.026
  14. Hucklebridge, F., Hussain, T., Evans, P., and Clow, A., 2005, The diurnal patterns of the adrenal steroids cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in relation to awakening. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.04.007
  15. Jegede, O. J., 1988, The development of the science, technology and society curricula in Nigeria. International journal of science education, 10, 399-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100407
  16. Joels, M., Pu, Z. W., Wiegert, O., Oitzl, M. S., and Krugers, H. J., 2006, Learning under stress: how does it work?. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.002
  17. Kalman, B. A. and Grahn, R. E., 2004, Measuring salivary cortisol in the behavioral neuroscience laboratory. The Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 2, A41-A49.
  18. Kopp, M. S., Thege, B. K., Balog, P., Stauder, A., Salavecz, G., Rozsa, S., Purebl, G., and Adam, S., 2009, Measures of stress in epidemiological research. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69, 211-225.
  19. Kudielka, B. M., Hellhammer, D. H., and Wust, S., 2009, Why do we respond so differently? Reviewing determinants of human salivary cortisol responses to challenge. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.004
  20. Kurz, H., Trunk, H., and Weitz, B., 1977, Evaluation of method to determine protein-binding of drugs: Equilibrium dialysis, ultracentrifugation, gel filtration. Arzneimittel-Forschung, 27, 1373-1380.
  21. Kwon, Y. J., Lee, J. K., and Lee, J. M., 2009, Analysis on the correlations among changes in learner's emotion, physiological state and hypothesis-generating ability during the hypothesis-generating process. Secondary Education Institute, 57, 275-295. (in Korean)
  22. Lee, H. R. and Lim, C. H., 2002, A new approach to the science education assessment using partial credits to different science inquiry problem solving process types. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 23, 147-153.
  23. Levine, A., Zagoory-Sharon, O., Reldman, R., Lewis, J. G., and Weller, A., 2007, Measuring cortisol in human psychobiological studies. Physiology &Behavior, 90, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.08.025
  24. Lopez-Duran, N. L., Hajal, N. J., Olson, S. L., Felt, B. T., and Vazquez, D. M., 2009, Individual differences in cortisol responses to fear and frustration during middle childhood. Journal of experimental child psychology, 103, 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.008
  25. Lupien, S. J., Fiocco, A., Wan, N., Maheu, F., Lord, C., Schramek, T., and Tu, T., 2004, Stress hormones and human memory function across the lifespan. Pychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 225-242.
  26. MacGeorge, E. L., Samter, W., and Gilihan, S. J., 2005, Academic stress, supportive communication, and health. Communication Education, 54, 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520500442236
  27. Mayer, R. E., 2009, Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 23 p.
  28. Nam, Y., 2016, Developing a framework of conceptual understandings of earth systems. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 37, 309-322. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2016.37.5.309
  29. Pacak, K., and Palkovits, M., 2001, Stressor specificity of central neuroendocrine responses: implications for stress-related disorders. Endocrine Reviews, 22, 502-548. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv.22.4.0436
  30. Peeck, J., 1993, Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learning and Instruction, 3, 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(93)90006-L
  31. Pritchard, M. E. and Wilson, G. S., 2003, Using emotional and social factors to predict student success. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2003.0008
  32. Read, G. F., 1993, Status report on measurement of salivary estrogens and androgens. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 694, 146-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb18349.x
  33. Renkl, A. and Atkinson, R. K., 2007, Interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. An introduction to the special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 235-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9052-5
  34. Sajaniemi, N., Suhonen, E., Kontu, E., Lindholm, H., and Hirvonen, A., 2012, Stress reactivity of six-year-old children involved in challenging tasks. Early child development and care, 182, 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2010.549941
  35. Schwabe, L., Joels, M., Roozendaal, B., Wolf, O. T., and Oitzl, M. S., 2012, Stress effects on memory: An update and integration. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 1740-1749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.002
  36. Shin, M. K., 2012, Exploring Korean pre-service elementary teachers' scientific inquiry using the science writing heuristic template. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 33, 459-466. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2012.33.5.459
  37. Tae, J., Lee, S., Lee, Y., and Kwon, Y., 2016, Differences in task performance according to the cognitive and emotional demands. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 28, 253-270. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2016.28.2.003
  38. Vittek, J., L'Hommedieu, D. G., Gordon, G. D., Rappaport, S. C., and Southren, A. L., 1985, Direct radioimmunoassay (RIA) of salivary testosterone: Correlation with free and total serum testosterone. Life Sciences, 37, 711-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(85)90540-5
  39. Vogel, S. and Schwabe, L., 2016, Learning and memory under stress: implications for the classroom. npj Science of Learning, 1, 16011. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.11
  40. Zhou, J. C., Chuang, M. H., Lan, E. H., Dunn, B., Gillman, P. L., and Smith, S. M., 2004, Immunoassays for cortisol using antibody-doped sol-gel silica. Journal of materials chemistry, 14, 2311-2316. https://doi.org/10.1039/B401902D