Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cognitive abilities and speakers' adaptation of a new acoustic form: A case of a /o/-raising in Seoul Korean

  • Received : 2018.07.31
  • Accepted : 2018.08.27
  • Published : 2018.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The vowel /o/ in Seoul Korean has been undergoing a sound change by altering the acoustic weighting of F2 and F1. Studies documented that this on-going change redefined the nature of a /o/-/u/ contrast as F2 differences rather than as F1 differences. The current study examined two cognitive factors namely executive function capacity (EF) and autistic traits, in terms of their roles in explaining who in speech community would adapt new acoustic forms of the target vowels, and who would retain the old forms. The participants, 55 college students speaking Seoul Korean, produced /o/ and /u/ vowels in isolated words; and completed three EF tasks (Digit N-Back, Stroop, and Trail-Making Task), and an Autism screening questionnaire. The relationships between speakers' cognitive task scores and their utilizations of F1 and F2 were analyzed using a series of correlation tests. Results yielded a meaningful relationship in participants' EF scores interacting with gender. Among the females, speakers with higher EF scores were better at retaining F1, which is a less informative cue for females since they utilized F2 more than they did F1 in realizing /o/ and /u/. In contrast, better EF control among male speakers was associated with more use of the new cue (F2) where males still utilized F1 as much as F2 in the production of /o/ and /u/ vowels. Taken together, individual differences in acoustic realization can be explained by individuals' cognitive abilities, and their progress in the sound change further predicts that cognitive ability influences the utilization of acoustic information which is non-primary to the speaker.

Keywords

References

  1. Arnett, J. A., & Labovitz, S. S. (1995). Effect of physical layout in performance of the trail making test. Psychological Assessment, 7(2), 220-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.2.220
  2. Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4
  3. Banks, B., Gowen, E., Mundro, K. J., & Adank, P. (2015). Cognitive predictors of perceptual adaptation to accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(4), 2015-2024. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4916265
  4. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The Autism-spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471
  5. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-51.
  6. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 6.0.40. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/ on May 11, 2018.
  7. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
  8. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
  9. Gordon-Salant, S., & Cole, S. S. (2016). Effects of age and working memory capacity on speech recognition performance in noise among listeners with normal hearing. Ear and Hearing, 37(5), 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000316
  10. Han, J. I., & Kang, H. (2013). Cross-generational change of /o/ and /u/ in Seoul Korean I: Proximity in vowel space. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 5(2), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2013.5.2.025
  11. Han, J. I., Kang, H., & Kim, J. Y. (2013). Cross-generational differences of /o/ and /u/ in informal text reading. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 5(4), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2013.5.4.201
  12. Jang, H., Shin, J., & Nam, H. (2015). Aspects of vowels by ages in Seoul dialect. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 21(2), 341-358. https://doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2015.21.2.341
  13. Janse, E., & Jesse, A. (2014). Working memory affects older adults' use of context in spoken-word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(9), 1842-1862. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.879391
  14. Kang, E. J., & Kong, E. (2016). Static and dynamic spectral properties of the monophthong vowels in Seoul Korean: Implication on sound change. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 8(4), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2016.8.4.039
  15. Kang, Y. (2014). A corpus-based study of positional variation in Seoul Korean vowels. Japanese/Korean Linguistics, 23, 1-20.
  16. Kim, S. (2015). ppcor: An R package for a fast calculation to semipartial correlation coefficients. Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 22(6), 665-674. https://doi.org/10.5351/CSAM.2015.22.6.665
  17. Kong, E. J., & Edwards, J. (2016). Individual differences in categorical perception of speech: Cue weighting and executive function. Journal of Phonetics, 59, 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.08.006
  18. Kong, E. J., Kang, S., & Seo, M. (2014). Gender difference in the affricate productions of young Seoul Korean speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(4), EL329-EL335. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4896420
  19. Labov, W. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2(2), 205-254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000338
  20. Lee, H., & Kong, E. (2016). Relationship between individual traits and variability in processing Korean stops: Implication on mechanism of sound change. Language and Linguistics, 71, 215-236. https://doi.org/10.20865/20167110
  21. Lee, H., Shin, W., & Shin, J. (2017). A sociophonetic study on high/mid back vowels in Korean. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 9(2), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2017.9.2.039
  22. Lee, J., Yoon, K., & Byun, K. (2016). A study of vowel shift in Seoul Korean. The Journal of Studies in Language, 31(4), 979-998. https://doi.org/10.18627/jslg.31.4.201602.979
  23. Lev-Ari, S., & Peperkamp, S. (2013). Low inhibitory skill leads to non-native perception and production in bilinguals' native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41(5), 320-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.06.002
  24. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
  25. Moon, S. J. (2007). A fundamental phonetic investigation of Korean monophthongs. Malsori, 62, 1-11.
  26. Psychology Software Tools, Incorporated. [E-Prime 2.0]. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.pstnet.com on August 15, 2017.
  27. R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/ on May 11, 2018.
  28. Seong, C. J. (2004). An acoustic analysis on the Korean 8 monophthongs: With respect to the acoustic variables on the F1/F2 vowel space. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Korea, 23(6), 454-461.
  29. Stewart, M. E., & Ota, M. (2008) Lexical effects on speech perception in individuals with "autistic" traits. Cognition, 109(1), 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.010
  30. Yu, A. (2010). Perceptual compensation is correlated with individuals' "autistic" traits: Implications for models of sound change. PLoS ONE, 5(8), e11950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011950
  31. Yu, A. C., Grove, J., Martinovic, M., & Sonderegger, M. (2011). Effects of working memory capacity and "autistic" traits on phonotactic effects in speech perception. Proceedings of the International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences XVII (pp. 2236-2239).