DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수학영재 학생들의 분석적 증명 학습 효과 검증을 위한 시선추적기의 활용

Application of Eye Tracker for Study on the Effect of Analytic Proof Learning of Gifted Students

  • Jung, Kyung-Woo (Miryang High School) ;
  • Yun, Jong-Gug (Department of Mathematics Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Lee, Kwang Ho (Department of Mathematics Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2018.06.15
  • 심사 : 2018.09.21
  • 발행 : 2018.09.30

초록

본 연구에서는 수학영재 학생들을 대상으로 분석법을 이용한 증명 학습을 하게 한 후 나타나는 시선의 변화 및 시선의 변화로 야기되는 학습 성취도의 변화가 어떠한지를 알아보고자 하였다. 시선의 변화를 알아보기 위해 시선추적기법을 도입하였으며, 시선추적기를 통해 분석법의 학습효과를 좀 더 객관적으로 파악하고자 하였다. 본 연구의 결과로서, 분석법을 학습한 후 학생들이 증명 문제를 풀 때, 증명 아랫부분에서부터 증명 윗부분으로 올라가는 방식으로 시선의 이동방향이 변화하였으며 증명 아랫부분에 대한 시선 점유 비율이 윗부분에 비해 높아짐을 알 수 있었다. 또한 분석법 학습으로 야기된 시선의 변화는 증명 학습 성취도와 상관관계가 있으며 증명 학습 성취도를 향상시킨다는 것을 알 수 있었다.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the change of gaze and the change of the proof learning achievement after learning the analytic method for proof to mathematical gifted students using eye tracking technique. In order to complete the purpose of this study, a mixed method research was used, that is a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. Quantitative analysis was conducted based on the data obtained through the eye tracker, and qualitative analysis was also done using post interview data to make up for the quantitative analysis. The subjects of this study were 8 mathematical gifted 3rd grade middle school students in the gifted education center. The conclusions of this study are as follows. First, the learning of analysis leads to a change of gaze in the proof learning of students. The students, after learning the analysis, moved their gaze from the bottom to the top when solving the proof problem, and the occupancy rate of the gaze to the bottom of the proof was higher than the higher part. Second, the change of gaze caused by the learning of the analysis have a correlation with the achievement of the proof learning and it can be seen that the method learning improves the achievement of the proof learning of the students.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Education (2013). The third gifted education Comprehensive plan(2013-2017).
  2. Ministry of Education (2013). Mathematics Curriculum. Ministry of Education #2015 74 [Separate volume 8].
  3. Kang, M.B. (1992). An Educational Study on Analysis. Journal of the Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2(2), 81-93.
  4. Ko, E.S. (2012). A Comparison of Mathematically Talented Students and Non-Talented Students' Level of Statistical Thinking: Statistical Modeling and Sampling Distribution Understanding. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(3), 503-525. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.3.503
  5. Kim, K.E., Seo, H.A. & Kim, D.H. (2016). Characteristics of Algebraic Thinking and its Errors by Mathematically Gifted Students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 26(1), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2016.26.1.211
  6. Kim, S.Y., Byeon, J.H., Lee, I.S. & Kwon, Y.J. (2012). An Eye tracking Study on Test-Item Solving of Science Scholastic Achievement focused in Elementary School Students. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 12(1), 65-78.
  7. Kim, S.Y., Byeon, J.H., Lee, I.S. & Kwon, Y.J. (2013). Development of an Instrument to Measure Task Commitment using Eye-tracking for Identifying Science Gifted Student. Biology Education, 41(3), 421-434. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.3.421
  8. Kim, W.K. et al. (2010). Middle School Mathematics 2, Seoul: Visang.
  9. Kim, W.K. et al. (2011). Middle School Mathematics 3, Seoul: Visang.
  10. Kim, H.J. (2015). Research for Analysis of Korean Reading Process Using Eye-tracking technology. The Language and Culture, 11(2), 131-159.
  11. Na, G.S. (1998). Analysis of the nature of proof and practice of proof education : focused on the middle school geometry. Doctorate thesis, Seoul National University.
  12. Na, G.S. (2009). Teaching Geometry Proof with focus on the Analysis. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 19(2), 185-206.
  13. Na, G.S. (2011). Analysing the Processes of Discovery and Proof of the Mathematically Gifted Students. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 21(2), 105-120.
  14. Ryu, S. R. (1998). A Study on the Meaning of Proof in Mathematics Education. The Mathematical Education, 37(1), 73-85.
  15. Ryu, H.C. & Je, S.Y. (2009). Construction of Quadratic Curves Using the Analysis Method on the Dynamic Geometry Environment. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 25(4), 168-189.
  16. Ryu, H.C. et al. (2013). Middle School Mathematics 2, Seoul: Chunjae.
  17. Ryu, H.C. et al. (2013). Middle School Mathematics 3, Seoul: Chunjae.
  18. Park, S.D. (2006). The Idea of Plane Geometry, Seosan: Dobi.
  19. Park, H.J. & Shin, D.H. (2015). Analysis of Processes in Reading about Science Stories in 6th Grade Science Textbook Using Eye-tracking. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0383
  20. Bae, Y.J. (2011). The Understanding of Modern Statistics, Seoul; Kyowoo.
  21. Byeon, J.H., Lee, I.S. & Kwon, Y.J. (2011). A Study on Consulting of Teaching Behavior Patterns of Gaze Fixation by using Eye Tracker: The Case Study. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 173-199.
  22. Seo, H., Kim, J.H., Oh, E.H. & Lee, S.R. (2015). A Experimental Study Using the Eye-tracker on Reading Characteristics of the Public Officials and the Ordinary Adults. Korean Education, 102(0), 7-44.
  23. Sung, T.J. (2014). Easy statistical analysis, Seoul: Hakjisa.
  24. Shin, W.S. (2016). A Review of Eye-tracking Method in Elementary Science Education Research. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(3), 288-304. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.3.288
  25. Woo, J.H. (2000). Principles and Methods of Teaching-Learning Mathematics, Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
  26. Lee, M.J. & Lee, K.H. (2015). Elementary Students’ Formation of Relational Thinking about Equation. School Mathematics, 17(3), 391-405.
  27. Lee, S.R. & Suh, H. (2013). The Current Status and Perspectives of Research on Reading Process Using Eye-tracker. Korean language education research, 46(0), 479-503.
  28. Lee, S.R. (2014). A Research on Traits of Adolescents' Reading and Eye movement in Internet Reading. Korean language education research, 49(2), 417-444. https://doi.org/10.20880/kler.2014.49.2.417
  29. Lee, C.Y. (2009). A study on the development of the activity worksheet applying the analysis-comprehensive proof methods. Master's thesis, Korea University.
  30. Jung, K. W. (2018). A Study on Proof Learning Method of Mathematically Gifted Students Using Eye Tracker. Master's thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  31. Han, M.H., Kwon, S.H. & Kwon, Y.J. (2015). Eye-tracking Patterns on Visual-Search Task in of Elementary Science-Gifted and General Students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(8), 67-81.
  32. Alcock, L., Hodds, M., Roy, S., & Inglis, M. (2015). Investigating and improving undergraduate proof comprehension. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 62(7), 742-752.
  33. Cavanagh, P. (1992). Adaptive changes in saccade amplitude: Aculocentric or orbitocentric mapping? Vision Research, 36, 2087-2098.
  34. Duchowski, A. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  35. Fischbein, E., & Kedem, I. (1982). Proof and certitude in the development of mathematical thinking. Proceedings of the sixth international conference for the psychology of mathematics education, 128-131. Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen Antwerp, Belgium.
  36. Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for research in mathematics education, 396-428.
  37. Holmqvist, K., Nystrom, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. New York: Oxford University Press.
  38. Kaldy, Z., Kraper, C., Carter, A. S., & Blaser, E. (2011). Toddlers with autism spectrum disorder are more successful at visual search than typically developing toddlers. Developmental science, 14(5), 980-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01053.x
  39. McFadden, S. A., Khan, A., & Wallman, J. (2002). Gain adaptation of exogenous shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 42(24), 2709-2726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00304-8
  40. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principle and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. 류희찬, 조완영, 이경화, 나귀수, 김남균, 방정숙 공역 (2007). 학교수학을 위한 원리와 규준, 서울: 경문사.
  41. Polya, G. (1971). How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 우정호 역 (2002). 어떻게 문제를 풀 것인가, 서울: 교우사.
  42. Senk, S. L. (1985). How well do students write geometry proofs? The mathematics teacher, 78(6), 448-456.