DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Students' Clinical Judgment Process During Nursing Simulation

간호시뮬레이션에서 나타나는 임상판단과정 분석

  • Shim, Kaka (College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago) ;
  • Shin, Hyunsook (College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Rim, Dahae (College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University)
  • 심가가 (일리노이대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 신현숙 (경희대학교 간호과학대학) ;
  • 임다해 (경희대학교 간호과학대학)
  • Received : 2018.06.26
  • Accepted : 2018.09.07
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

This study was a descriptive study, analyzing the clinical judgment process that occurs in a simulation of practice education for nursing students applying to LCJR. Subjects were two nursing college students in S city. Fever scenario and apnea scenario, including mock patient, were implemented. Data collection was conducted between September, 2013 and December, 2014. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and Pearson's correlation of PASW statistics 18.0 program. The result of this study revealed that the clinical judgment scores of nursing college students were 30.50 for males and 29.32 for females. Nursing Clinical judgment score for the apnea scenario was higher than the score for the febrile scenario, and nursing students' self-evaluation and professors' evaluation showed a significant correlation with respect to the responding domain. In comparison the student and faculty ratings, domain of interpreting and domain of reflecting were significant This study will provide educators with foundational knowledge of program development to enhance nursing students' clinical judgment abilities. We suggest more discussion on their nursing practice and judgment during debriefing session may be beneficial for students.

본 연구는 간호 학생을 대상으로 아동 간호학 실습 교육의 시뮬레이션 상황에서 일어나는 임상적 판단과정을 파악하고자 한다. 이를 위해 LCJR을 적용한 기술적 서술 연구(descriptive study)로 진행되었다. S시에 소재한 2개의 대학의 간호대학생을 대상으로 2013년 9월부터 2014년 12월 까지 모의 환자를 포함한 발열 시나리오와 무호흡 시나리오를 사용하여 시뮬레이션이 진행되었다. 본 연구 결과 간호 대학생의 임상판단 점수는 남학생 30.50(${\pm}2.77$)점, 여학생29.32(${\pm}2.67$)점이었으며, 무호흡 시나리오 임상판단 점수($31.20{\pm}2.84$)가 발열 시나리오 점수($28.71{\pm}2.63$)보다 높았고, 학습자의 자가평가(.911)와 교수자의 평가(.921)에서 반응(responding)영역이 유의한 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 교수자와 학습자의 자가 평가 간 비교에서는 해석(interpreting)영역과 반영(reflecting)영역이 유의하게 나타났다. 본 연구는 간호 대학생의 임상 판단력을 높일 수 있는 실습과정을 수정 및 개발하는데 있어 기초 자료가 될 수 있다. 이 후 시뮬레이션 프로그램 내에 디브리핑 동안에 학생들의 간호 수행과 판단을 토론할 수 있는 경험을 제공하는 것이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Kardong-Edgren, K. A. Adamson, C. Fitzgerald, "A Review of Currently Published Evaluation Instruments for Human Patient Simulation", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Vol.6, No.1, pp.e25-e35, 2010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.08.004
  2. P. R. Jeffries, B. Norton, Selecting learning experiences to achieve curriculum outcomes. In D. M. Billings & J. A. Halstead(Eds.), Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (2nd ed., pp. 187-212). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, 2005.
  3. K. C. Lim, "Simulation-based Clinical Judgment and Performance Ability for Tracheal Suction in Nursing Students", The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, Vol.23, No.3, pp.330-340, 2017. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2017.23.3.330
  4. Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education, Accreditation assessment standards for education of Korea(the course of the nursing bachelor's degree). Seoul: Korean Nurses Association, 2017.
  5. K. I. Jeong, J. Y. Choi, "Effect of Debriefing Based on the Clinical Judgment Model on Simulation Based Learning Outcomes of End-of-Life Care for Nursing Students: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, Vol.47, No.6, pp.842-853, 2017. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2017.47.6.842
  6. K. Lasater, "Clinical judgement: The last frontier for evaluation", Nurse Education in Practice, Vol.11, No.2, pp.86-92, 2011. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.013
  7. J. A. Kim, J. K. Ko, "A Study on Clinical Reasoning Ability and Academic Achievements in Nursing Students", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.16, No.3, pp.1874-1883, 2015. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.3.1874
  8. C. A. Tanner, "Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgement in nursing", Journal of Nursing Education, Vol.45, No.6, pp.204-211, 2006.
  9. P. Benner, C. A. Tanner, C. A. Chesla, Expertise in nursing practice: Caring, clinical judgement, and ethics. New York: Springer, 1996.
  10. K. Lasater, "Clinical judgement development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric", Journal of Nursing Education, Vol.46, No.11, pp.496-503, 2007.
  11. M. L. Cato, K. Lasater, A. I. Peeples, "Nursing students' self-assessment of their simulation experiences", Nursing Education Perspectives, Vol.30, No.2, pp.105-108, 2009.
  12. K. Lasater, A. Nielsen, "Reflective Journaling for Clinical Judgment Development and Evaluation", Journal of Nursing Education, Vol.48, No.1, pp.40-44, 2009. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20090101-06
  13. E. H. Ha, "Attitudes toward Video-Assisted Debriefing after simulation in undergraduate nursing students: An application of Q methodology", Nurse Education Today, Vol.34, No.6, pp.978-984, 2014. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.01.003
  14. K. A. Adamson, P. Gubrud, S. Sideras, K. Lasater, "Assessing the Reliability, Validity, and Use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: Three Approaches", Journal of Nursing Education, Vol.51, No.2, pp.66-73, 2012. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20111130-03
  15. J. Victor-Chmil, "Critical Thinking Versus Clinical Reasoning Versus Clinical Judgment: Differential Diagnosis", Nurse Educator, Vol.38, No.1, pp.34-36, 2013. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e318276dfbe
  16. S. Sideras, An examination of the construct validity of a clinical judgement evaluation tool in the setting of high-fidelity simulation (Unpublished dissertation). Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 2007.
  17. R. A. Kuiper, C. Heinrich, A. Matthias, M. J. Graham, L. Bell-Kotwall, "Debriefing with the OPT model of clinical reasoning during high fidelity patient simulation", International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, Vol.5, No.1, pp.1-14, 2008. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1466
  18. S. B. Issenberg, W. C. McGaghie, E. R. Petrusa, D. L. Gordon, R. J. Scalese, "Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review", Medical Teacher, Vol.27, No.1, pp.10-28, 2005. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924
  19. H. Shin, Y. Lee, D. H. Rim, "Evaluation of Algorithm-Based Simulation Scenario for Emergency Measures with High-Risk Newborns Presenting with Apnea", Child Health Nursing Research, Vol.21, No.2, pp.98-106, 2015. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2015.21.2.98
  20. P. Benner, C. Tanner, "Clinical Judgment: How Expert Nurses Use Intuition", The American Journal of Nursing, Vol.87, No.1, pp.23-31, 1987. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3470396
  21. K. Shim, H. Shin, "The Reliability and Validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric in Korean Nursing Students", Child Health Nursing Research, Vol.21, No.2, pp.160-167, 2015. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2015.21.2.160
  22. J. Kim, S. Kim, K. Bang, C. Koh, N. Lee, J. Yu, "Study on the Academic Achievements, Satisfaction, and Educational Demands of Nursing Students at a College of Nursing", Perspectives in Nursing Science, Vol.9, No.2, pp.127-135, 2012.
  23. H. P. Strickland, M. H. Cheshire, A. L. March, "Clinical Judgment During Simulation: A Comparison of Student and Faculty Scores", Nursing Education Perspectives, Vol.38, No.2, pp.85-86, 2017. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000109
  24. R. Jensen, "Clinical reasoning during simulation: Comparison of student and faculty ratings", Nurse Education in Practice, Vol.13, No.1, pp.23-28, 2013. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.07.001
  25. S. Decker, K. T. Dreifuerst, Integrating guided reflection into simulated learning experiences. Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation, pp.73-85, 2007.
  26. J. C. Childs, S. Sepples, "Clinical teaching by simulation: Lessons learned from a complex patient care scenario", Nursing Education Perspectives, Vol.27, No.3, pp.154-158, 2006.
  27. I. Colthart, G. Bagnall, A. Evans, H. Allbutt, A. Haig, J. Illing, B. McKinstry, "The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10", Medical Teacher, Vol.30, No.2, pp.124-145, 2008. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590701881699
  28. D. A. Davis, P. E. Mazmanian, M. Fordis, R. Van Harrison, K. E. Thorpe, L. Perrier, "Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review", JAMA, Vol.296, No.9, pp.1094-1102, 2006. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.9.1094
  29. A. H. Davis, L. P. Kimble, "Human Patient Simulation Evaluation Rubrics for Nursing Education: Measuring The Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice", Journal of Nursing Education, Vol.50, No.11, pp.605-611, 2011. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20110715-01
  30. E. H. Ha, H. S. Song, "The Effects of Structured Self-Debriefing Using on the Clinical Competency, Self-Efficacy, and Educational Satisfaction in Nursing Students after Simulation", The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, Vol.21, No.4, pp.445-454, 2015. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2015.21.4.445