The Effect of Characteristics of Entrepreneur on Venture Business Managerial Performance: By Separating the Duration of Firm's Survival

창업자 특성이 벤처기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향: 기업의 생존기간을 구분하여

  • Received : 2018.07.09
  • Accepted : 2018.08.29
  • Published : 2018.08.31

Abstract

During few decades, Korean economy has been growing with heavy and manufacturing industries. However, the economy meets limitations of growth rate, and employment rate. The Korean government has been trying to overcome these limitations using development of venture businesses and re-organization of industrial ecosystem. These efforts make high survival rate of recent venture companies. There are previous researches about relation between characteristics of entrepreneur and managerial performance, there are several limitations. Firstly, most of papers were based on survey with specific region or industry. Secondly, related researches were carried out with unable to distinguish among firm's survival periods. This paper uses the '2017 Survey of Korea Venture Firms' data that is approved by the Korean government. This data includes whole industries and survival periods. The aim of this research is finding the effect of characteristics of entrepreneur on managerial performance of venture firms by different survival periods using data envelopment analysis (DEA). If entrepreneur has doctoral degree, the firm's managerial performance is lower than bachelor degree. In addition, over 10 years of working career, and joint-venture have positive effect on firm's performance. This paper can provide valuable information to venture related policy makers and investment decision makers.

지난 수십년 간 제조업과 대기업 중심의 성장을 진행해 온 한국 경제는 최근 성장과 고용의 한계에 직면하고 있다. 정부는 이러한 현실을 개선하기 위하여 지속적으로 벤처기업 육성 및 산업 생태계 재편에 집중하고 있으며, 이러한 노력의 결과는 최근 벤처기업의 높은 생존율로 나타나고 있다. 이에 따라, 벤처기업 생존율 개선 관점의 연구에서 성과 창출과 유지 관점으로의 연구 패러다임 전환이 필요하다. 벤처기업의 경영성과에 영향을 미치는 요인을 규명한 연구는 내부 및 외부 요인으로 구분되어 꾸준히 진행되고 있었으며, 창업자 특성은 내부요인으로 구분된다. 다양한 선행연구를 조사 및 검토한 결과 한계점이 존재한다. 첫째, 대부분 설문조사 기반 특정 지역 또는 산업 중심의 단편적 연구가 진행되었다. 둘째, 설문조사 시점을 중심으로 연구가 진행됨에 따라 기업의 생존기간 구분이 힘들고, 기간 구분 없이 진행되었다. 기존 선행연구의 한계점을 보완하기 위하여 생존기간 별 영향요인의 상이한 효과를 살펴볼 필요가 있었으며, 본 연구는 국내 외 선행연구들이 성과와의 관계에서 가장 먼저 주목하였었던 창업자특성에 주목하였다. 벤처기업은 일반기업과 비교하여 기업 내 인적역량이 초기 및 장기 성과를 좌우할 수 있는 주요 요인이며, 창업자특성은 이러한 인적역량의 근간이라고 할 수 있다. 이에 본 연구는 정부승인통계인 벤처기업정밀실태조사 원데이터를 활용하여 국내 전 산업의 벤처기업을 대상으로 기업의 생존 기간을 구분하고, 각 기간 별 창업자 특성이 경영성과에 미치는 영향을 자료포락분석 (DEA, Data Envelopment Analysis)을 활용하여 살펴보았다. 분석 결과, 창업자가 박사일 경우 학사인 경우와 비교하여 창업초기 및 중장기 관점에서의 경영성과가 저조한 것으로 나타났으며, 관련 실무경력은 10년 이상일 경우, 그리고 공동창업을 한 경우 창업초기의 경영성과에 도움을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 벤처기업 정책 입안자와 민간 투자 의사결정자들이 참고할 수 있는 기반 자료를 제공할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed, M. U., Kristal. M. M., & Pagell. M.(2014). Impact of operational and marketing capabilities on firm performance: Evidence from economic growth and downturns, International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.03.025
  2. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W.(1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  3. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E.(1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  4. Chi, S. K., Kim, J. K., Choi, J. S., Shin, J. K., & Choi, S. H.(2002). An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Success Factors and Management Performance of Venture Business: Focus on Venture Business in Busan, Korean Journal of Business Administration, 33, 119-150.
  5. Cho, H. R.(1995). The relationship between entrepreneurial characteristics, product innovativeness and venture firm performance, Doctor's thesis, Korea advanced institute of science and technology.
  6. Cho, Y. K.(2010). R&D Efficiency and Productivity in Korea, Japan and China, International Area Studies Review, 14(2), 43-60.
  7. Choi, K. O., Yun, J. H., Lee, J. K., & Yeo, G. T.(2015). Analysis of efficiency of forwarding companies using DEA, The Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 86(0), 331-352.
  8. Chun, D. P., Chung, Y. H., & Bang, S. S.(2014). Measuring R&D Productivity of the Major Korean Firms : Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Korean Journal of Accounting Research, 19(4), 173-190.
  9. Chun, D., Chung, Y., & Bang. S.(2015). Impact of firm size and industry type on R&D efficiency throughout innovation and commercialisation stages: evidence from Korean manufacturing firms, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(8), 895-909. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1024645
  10. Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M.(2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA)-Thirty years on, European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.032
  11. Cooper, A. C., & Gimeno-Gascon, F. J.(1990). Entrepreneurs, processes of founding, and new firm performance, Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic, and Management Sciences, Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University.
  12. Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S.(1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach, Economics Letters, 50(1), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(95)00729-6
  13. Go, B. S., Yong, S. J., & Lee, S. C.(2003). Articles: An Empirical Study on the Determinants of New Venture Performance, The Journal of Small Business Innovation, 6(2), 3-33.
  14. Guan, J. C., Yam, R. C., Mok, C. K., & Ma. N.(2006). A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models, European Journal of Operational Research, 170(3), 971-986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.054
  15. Ha, G. R., & Choi, S. B.(2014). The evaluation of relative management efficiency of automobile companies using non-parametric approach, Knowledge Management Research, 15(2), 147-164.
  16. Herron, L., & Robinson Jr, R. B.(1993). A structural model of the effects of entrepreneurial characteristics on venture performance, Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90032-Z
  17. Hwang, K. Y., & Koo, J. S.(2011). An Evaluation on the International Competitiveness of Korean and Global Container Shipping Company through a Comparative Analysis on the Efficiency, International Commerce and Information Review, 13(1), 123-144.
  18. Hwang, S. M., Yeon, S. S., & Lee, D. H.(2016). The Effect of Management Accounting System on Business Performance of Venture Companies : Focusing on Business Strategies as Mediating Variables, Korean Journal of Accounting Research, 21(2), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.21737/kjar.2016.04.21.2.81
  19. KBIZ(2017). SMEs status of 2017, Seoul : KBIZ.
  20. Kim, G. H.(2017). A Study on the Status of Corporate Ecosystem in Korea through International Comparison, Seoul: Institute for international trade.
  21. Kim, J. H., Kim, H. S., Leem, B. N., & Yoon, J. H.(2012). Analyzing the National Medical Service Efficiency of OECD Countries Using DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index, Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 37(4), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.7737/JKORMS.2012.37.4.125
  22. Kim, M. S., Hwang, B. Y., & Kim, H.(2010). A Study on Influence to Business performance of business incubator company via CEO's Characteristics, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 33-57. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.5.2.201006.33
  23. Kim, S. Y., & Shin, H. H.(2015). The Effect of Proportion of Sales to Buyers on Firm Performance: for the Suppliers of Big Firm, Journal of Strategic Management, 18(2), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.17786/jsm.2015.18.2.002
  24. Kim, T. H., Kim, I. H., Ahn, S. B., & Lee, K. S.(2009). A Way to Enhance Efficiency of Nuclear Program in Korean R&D Program by Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 12(1), 70-87.
  25. Lee, H. M., & Kang, M. C.(2006). A Study on the Impact Factors of IT Venture Business Performance, Korean Journal of Business Administration, 19(3), 1059-1092.
  26. Lee, S. B.(2017). An Analysis on the Critical Startup Success Factors in Small-Sized Venture Businesses, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.12.3.201706.53
  27. Lee, S. W., Lee, K. H., & Sung, C. S.(2018). Effects of the characteristics of transactions between SMEs and large companies on collaborative activities and collaborative performance, Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 13(3), 1-22.
  28. Lee, Y. H., & Park, S. H.(2014). A Study on the Success Factors of Venture Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurship Education, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 9(6), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.9.6.201412.231
  29. Lieberman, M. B., & Dhawan, R.(2005). Assessing the resource base of Japanese and US auto producers: A stochastic frontier production function approach, Management Science, 51(7), 1060-1075. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0416
  30. Lim, J. D., Kang, S. M., & Baek, C. G.(2006). Performance analysis of technology-related research centers of universities and cooperative business corporations as the principle bodies of knowledge cluster, Journal of Korean National Economy, 24(1), 127-152.
  31. Ministry of SMEs and Startup.(2017). 2017 Survey of Korea Venture Firms, Daejeon: Ministry of SMEs and Startup.
  32. Moon, S. W., Chung, S. H., & Lee, S. Y.(2016). An Empirical Study on the Effects of Internal Competence and External Factors for the Performance of Korean Bio-Ventures, Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 38(4), 53-76.
  33. O, D. I.(2001). Efficiency evaluation of well-performed listed construction companies during 3 years in the period of Korean financial crisis by DEA, Korean Accounting Review, 26(4), 27-61.
  34. OECD(2013). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013, Paris, OECD Publishing.
  35. Park, C. M., & Kim, T. S.(2014). A study on the Efficiency of Logistics Industry in Korea using DEA-SBM, Korean Journal of Logistics, 22(4), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.15735/kls.2014.22.4.003
  36. Park, J. Y.(2017). Venture, Start-up revitalization policy, Seoul: National assembly research service.
  37. Park, K. M., & Hwang, J. W.(2016). Organizational capability, competitive strategy and firm performance in venture businesses, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 17(2), 272-281. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.2.272
  38. Park, M. H.(2008). Efficiency and productivity analysis, Seoul : Korea scholar information.
  39. Qin, Y., & Q. Wu.(2012). An Empirical Study on Operational Efficiency of Chinese Listed Logistics Corporations. Computational Sciences and Optimization (CSO), 2012 Fifth International Joint Conference on, IEEE.
  40. Roure, J. B., & Maidique, M. A.(1986). Linking prefunding factors and high-technology venture success: An exploratory study, Journal of Business Venturing, 1(3), 295-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(86)90006-6
  41. Sandberg, W. R. & Hofer, C. W.(1987). Improving new venture performance: The role of strategy, industry structure, and the entrepreneur, Journal of Business venturing, 2(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90016-4
  42. Song, C. H., & Son, D. H.(2005). The Effect of Traits of the Enterpriser on the Outcome of the Company, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 38(2), 53-79.
  43. Song, H. J., & Lee, M. Y.(2016). The effects of large firms' win-win growth activity on SMEs' business performance: A case study on the global hidden champion nurturing program by Samsung electronics, Korean Accounting Journal, 25(5), 113-139.
  44. Statistics Korea(2017). 2016 Results of enterprise demographic statistics, Daejeon: Statistics Korea.
  45. Wang, E. C., & Huang, W.(2007). Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach, Research Policy, 36(2), 260-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.004
  46. Yoon, B. H., & Park, J. B.(2007). A Study on the Relationship Between the Performance of Venture Business and CEO's Characteristics, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 2(3), 145-168.