Korean Journal of Agricultural Science (농업과학연구)

Institute of Agricultural Science, CNU (충남대학교 농업과학연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of SNP marker set for marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC) in cultivating tomato varieties

  • Park, GiRim (Seeders Inc.) ;
  • Jang, Hyun A (Department of Applied Biology, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jo, Sung-Hwan (Seeders Inc.) ;
  • Park, Younghoon (Department of Horticultural Bioscience, Pusan National University) ;
  • Oh, Sang-Keun (Department of Applied Biology, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Nam, Moon (Seeders Inc.)
  • Received : 2018.07.16
  • Accepted : 2018.08.06
  • Published : 2018.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC) is useful for selecting offspring with a highly recovered genetic background for a recurrent parent at early generation unlike rice and other field crops. Molecular marker sets applicable to practical MABC are scarce in vegetable crops including tomatoes. In this study, we used the National Center for Biotechnology Information- short read archive (NCBI-SRA) database that provided the whole genome sequences of 234 tomato accessions and selected 27,680 tag-single nucleotide polymorphisms (tag-SNPs) that can identify haplotypes in the tomato genome. From this SNP dataset, a total of 143 tag-SNPs that have a high polymorphism information content (PIC) value (> 0.3) and are physically evenly distributed on each chromosome were selected as a MABC marker set. This marker set was tested for its polymorphism in each pairwise cross combination constructed with 124 of the 234 tomato accessions, and a relatively high number of SNP markers polymorphic for the cross combination was observed. The reliability of the MABC SNP set was assessed by converting 18 SNPs into Luna probe-based high-resolution melting (HRM) markers and genotyping nine tomato accessions. The results show that the SNP information and HRM marker genotype matched in 98.6% of the experiment data points, indicating that our sequence analysis pipeline for SNP mining worked successfully. The tag-SNP set for the MABC developed in this study can be useful for not only a practical backcrossing program but also for cultivar identification and F1 seed purity test in tomatoes.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae JH, Han Y, Jeong HJ, Kwon JK, Chae Y, Choi HS, Kang BC. 2010. Development of a SNP marker set for tomato cultivar identification. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 28:627-637. [in Korean]
  2. Birrer M, Kolliker R, Manzanares C, Asp T, Studer B. 2014. A DNA marker assay based on high-resolution melting curve analysis for distinguishing species of the Festuca-Lolium complex. Molecular Breeding 34:421-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-014-0044-0
  3. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Society of Human Genetics 32:314-331.
  4. Causse M, Desplat N, Pascual L, Paslier MCL, Sauvage C, Bauchet G, Berard A, Bounon R, Tchoumakov M, Brunel D, Bouchet JP. 2013. Whole genome resequencing in tomato reveals variation associated with introgression and breeding events. BMC Genomics 14:791. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-791
  5. Collard BC, Mackill DJ. 2008. Marker-assisted selection: An approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363:557-572. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2170
  6. Costa J, Mafra I, Oliverira MBPP. 2012. High resolution melting analysis as a new approach to detect almond DNA encoding for Pru du 5 allergen in foods. Food Chemistry 133:1062-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.01.077
  7. Edwards D, Batley J. 2010. Plant genome sequencing: Application for crop improvement. Plant Biotechnology Journal 8:2-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00459.x
  8. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, Mitchell SE. 2011. A robust, simple genotyping- by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6:e19379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019379
  9. Foolad MR. 2007. Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato. International Journal of Plant Genomics Article 2007: 64358. doi: 10.1155/2007/64358.
  10. Hwang JH, Kim HJ, Chae Y, Choi HS, Kim MK, Park YH. 2012. Evaluation of germplasm and development of SSR markers for marker-assisted backcross in tomato. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 30:557-567. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7235/hort.2012.12032
  11. Jang HA, Oh SK. 2017. Development of an efficient genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) library construction method for genomic analysis of grapevine. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 44:495-503. [in Korean]
  12. Kim JE, Lee BW, Kim SM, Lee BM, Lee JH, Jo SH. 2013. Genome-wide SNP database for marker-assisted background selection in tomato. Korean Journal of Breeding Science 45:232-239. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2013.45.3.232
  13. Labate JA, Robertson LD, Strickler SR, Mueller LA. 2014. Genetic structure of the four wild tomato species in the Solanum peruvianum s.l. species complex. Genome 57:169-180. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2014-0003
  14. Lee YG, Jeong N, Kim JH, Lee K, Kim KH, Pirani A, Ha BK, Kang ST, Park BS, Moon JK, Kim N, Jeong SC. 2015. Development, validation and genetic analysis of a large soybean SNP genotyping array. The Plant Journal 81:625-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12755
  15. Liew M, Seipp M, Durtschi J, Margraf RL, Dames S, Erali M, Voelkerding K, Wittwer C. 2007. Closed-tube SNP genotyping without labeled probes. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 127:341-348. https://doi.org/10.1309/N7RARXH3623AVKDV
  16. Lin T, Zhu G, Zhang J, Xu X, Yu Q, Zheng Z, Zhang Z, Lun Y, Li S, Wang X, Huang Z, Li J, Zhang C, Wang T, Zhang Y, Wang A, Zhang Y, Lin K, Li C, Xiong G, Xue Y, Mazzucato A, Causse M, Fei Z, Giovannoni JJ, Chetelat RT, Zamir D, Stadler T, Li J, Ye Z, Du Y, Huang S. 2014. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nature Genetics 46:1220-1226. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3117
  17. Park PH, Chae Y, Kim HR, Chung KH, Oh DG, Kim KT. 2010a. Development of a SCAR maker linked to Ph-3 in Solanum ssp. Korean Journal of Breeding Science 42:139-143.
  18. Park YH, Kim KH, Choi YM, Choi HS, Chae Y, Park KS, Chung SM. 2010b. Evaluation of TYLCV-resistant tomato germplasm using molecular markers. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 28:89-97.
  19. Sahu KK, Chattopadhyay D. 2017. Genome-wide sequence variations between wild and cultivated tomato species revisited by whole genome sequence mapping. BMC Genomics 18:430 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3822-3
  20. Servin B, Hospital F. 2002. Optimal positioning of markers to control genetic background in markerassisted backcrossing. Journal of Heredity 93:214-217. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.3.214
  21. The Tomato Genome Consortium. 2012. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485:635-641. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11119
  22. Zhong WL, Wang L, Zhang J, Chen XF, Zhang W, Dou X, Yu B. 2016. Development of unlabeled probe based high-resolution melting analysis for detection of filaggrin gene mutation c.3321delA. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 30:892-896. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.21953
  23. Zhou L, Myers AN, Vandersteen JG, Wang L, Wittwer CT. 2004. Closed-tube genotyping with unlabeled oligonucleotide probes and a saturating DNA dye. Clinical Chemistry 50:1328-1335. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2004.034322

Cited by

  1. Effect of different biochar formulations on the growth of cherry tomatoes vol.46, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20190075
  2. Development of a SNP marker set related to crown gall disease in grapevines by a genome wide association study vol.47, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20200057
  3. Identification of the ‘Haryejosaeng’ mandarin cultivar by multiplex PCR-based SNP genotyping vol.47, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05850-4