DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Handling Semantic Ambiguity for Metadata Generation

  • Yang, Gi-Chul (Department of Convergence Software, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Ran (Colledge of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University)
  • Received : 2018.02.10
  • Accepted : 2018.03.03
  • Published : 2018.05.31

Abstract

The following research questions are examined in this paper. What hinders quality metadata generation and metadata interoperability? What kind of semantic representation technique can be utilized in order to enhance metadata quality and semantic interoperability? This paper suggests a way of handling semantic ambiguity for metadata generation. The conceptual graph is utilized to disambiguate semantic ambiguities caused by isolation of a metadata element and its corresponding definition from the relevant context. The mechanism introduced in this paper has the potential to alleviate issues dealing with inconsistent metadata application and interoperability across digital collections.

Keywords

References

  1. Park, Jung-ran. Semantic Interoperability and Metadata Quality: An Analysis of Metadata Item Records of Digital Image Collections. Knowledge Organization, Vol. 33 (1): 20-34. 2006.
  2. Park, Jung-ran. Metadata Quality in Digital Repositories: A Survey of the Current State of the Art. Special Issue on Metadata and Open Access Repositories (M.S. Babinec and H. Mercer Eds.). Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, Vol. 47(3): 213-228. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370902737240
  3. Park, Jung-ran and Childress, Eric. Dublin Core Metadata Semantics: An Analysis of the Perspectives of Information Professionals. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 35(6): 727-739. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551509337871
  4. Bui, Yen and Park, Jung-ran. An Assessment of Metadata Quality: A Case Study of the National Science Digital Library Metadata Repository. In Haidar Moukdad (Ed.). Information Science Revisited: Approaches to Innovation, CAIS/ACSI 2006 Proceedings of the 2006 annual conference of the Canadian Association f or Information Science held with the Congress of the Social Sciences and Humanities of Canada at the York University, Toronto, Ontario. June 1 - 3, 2006. http://www.cais-acsi.ca/proceedings/2006/bui_2006.pdf 2006.
  5. Vizine-Goetz, D., Hickey, C., Houghton, A., and Thompson, R. Vocabulary mapping for terminology servi ces. Journal of Digital Information 4(4), Themes: Digital libraries, information discovery. 2004.
  6. Howarth, Lynne C. Designing a common namespace for searching metadata-enabled knowledge repositories: an international perspective. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 37(1/2): 173-185. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v37n01_12
  7. Miller G. A., Beckwith R., Fellbaum C., Gross D., Miller K., Introduction to WordNet : An on-line lexical database. Journal of Lexicography, 3, 235-244. 1990. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/3.4.235
  8. Sowa, J. Conceptual Structure: Information Processing in Mind and Machine, Addison Wesley, Massachusetts, 1984.
  9. Uta Priss, Simon Polovina, Richard Hill, Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Architectures for Smart Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 4604, 2007.
  10. Yang, Gi-Chul & K.S. Choi, Construction of a Knowledge Base by using Korean Text, AAAI96- Fall Symposium, MIT, U.S.A. 1996.