DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Dustiness of Eleven Nanomaterials using Voltex Shaker Method

볼텍스쉐이커를 이용한 11개 나노물질의 분진날림 비교

  • Lee, Naroo (Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency) ;
  • Park, Jinwoo (Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency)
  • Received : 2018.09.03
  • Accepted : 2018.09.20
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

Objectives: Dustiness of nanomaterials is considered as exposure index of essential material. Research on dustiness of nanomaterial is needed to control exposure in workplaces. Method: Dustiness measurement using vortex shaker were installed in the laboratory. Nanomaterials, 1 g, was put in the glass test tube and shaked using vortex shaker. Aerosol dispersed was measured using scanning mobility particle sizer(SMPS) and optical particle counter(OPC). Mass concentration using PVC filter and cassette was measured and TEM grid sampling was conducted. Total particle concentration and size distribution were calculated. Image and chemical composition of particles in the air were observed using transmission electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer. Eleven different test nanomaterials were used in the study. Results: Rank of mass concentration and particle number concentration were coincided in most cases. Rank of nanomateirals with low concentration were not coincided. Two types of fumed silica had the highest mass concentration and particle number concentration. Indium tin oxide, a mixture of indium oxide and tin oxide, had high mass concentration and particle number concentration. Indium oxide had very low mass concentration and particle number concentration. Agglomeration of nanoparticles in the air were observed in TEM analysis and size distribution. In this study, mass concentration and particle number concentration were coincided and two index can be used together. The range of dustiness in particle number concentration were too wide to measure in one method. Conclusion: Particle number concentration ranged from low concentration to high concentration depend on type of nanomaterial, and varied by preparation and amount of nanomaterial used. Further study is needed to measure dustiness of all nanomaterial as one reference method.

Keywords

References

  1. Boundy M, Leith D, Polton T. Method to evaluate the dustiness of pharmaceutical powders. Ann Occup Hyg 2006; 50(5):453-458 https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mel004
  2. Brouwer D, Ingrid HM Links, Sjaak AF De Vreede, Yvette Christopher. Size Selective Dustiness and Exposure; Simulated Workplace Comparisons. Ann Occup Hyg 2006; 50(5):443-452
  3. Evans DE, Turkevich LA, Roettgers CT, Deye GJ, Baron P. Dustiness of fine and nanoscale powders. Ann Occup Hyg 2013;57(2):261-277 https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mes060
  4. Fujitani Y, Furuyama A, Hirano S. Generation of airborne multi-walled carbon nanotubes for inhalation studies. Aerosol Science and Technology 2009;43:881-890 https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903002423
  5. O'Shaughnessy PT, Kang M, Ellickson D. A novel device for measuring respirable dustiness using low mass powder samples. J Occup Environ Hyg 2012;9(3):129-139 https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2011.652061
  6. Schneider T, Jensen KA. Combined sing-drop and rotating drum dustiness test of fine to nanosize powders using a small drum. Ann Occup Hyg 2008; 52(1):23-34 https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mem059
  7. Tsai, CJ, Lin GY, Liu CN, He CE, Chen CW. Characteristic of nanoparticles generated from different nano-powders by using different disepersion methods. J Nanopart Res 2012; 14:777 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-0777-9