Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • Volume 40
  • /
  • Pages.2.1-2.7
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Recent advances in the reconstruction of cranio-maxillofacial defects using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing

  • Oh, Ji-hyeon (Department of Oral and MaxilloFacial Surgery, Dental Hospital, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • Received : 2017.12.30
  • Accepted : 2018.01.16
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With the development of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology, it has been possible to reconstruct the cranio-maxillofacial defect with more accurate preoperative planning, precise patient-specific implants (PSIs), and shorter operation times. The manufacturing processes include subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing and should be selected in consideration of the material type, available technology, post-processing, accuracy, lead time, properties, and surface quality. Materials such as titanium, polyethylene, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), hydroxyapatite (HA), poly-DL-lactic acid (PDLLA), polylactide-co-glycolide acid (PLGA), and calcium phosphate are used. Design methods for the reconstruction of cranio-maxillofacial defects include the use of a pre-operative model printed with pre-operative data, printing a cutting guide or template after virtual surgery, a model after virtual surgery printed with reconstructed data using a mirror image, and manufacturing PSIs by directly obtaining PSI data after reconstruction using a mirror image. By selecting the appropriate design method, manufacturing process, and implant material according to the case, it is possible to obtain a more accurate surgical procedure, reduced operation time, the prevention of various complications that can occur using the traditional method, and predictive results compared to the traditional method.

Keywords

References

  1. Rachmiel A, Shilo D, Blanc O, Emodi O (2017) Reconstruction of complex mandibular defects using integrated dental custom-made titanium implants. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:425-427 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.01.006
  2. Kim JW, Kim DY, Ahn KM, Lee JH (2016) Surgical implications of anatomical variation in anterolateral thigh flaps for the reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial soft tissue defects: focus on perforators and pedicles. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:265-270 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.5.265
  3. Rudman K, Hoekzema C, Rhee J (2011) Computer-assisted innovations in craniofacial surgery. Facial Plast Surg 27:358-365 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1283054
  4. Seok H, Kim MK, Kim SG (2016) Reconstruction of partial maxillectomy defect with a buccal fat pad flap and application of 4-hexylresorcinol: a case report. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:370-374 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.6.370
  5. Groover MP, Zimmers EW (1984) CAD/CAM: computer-aided design and manufacturing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs; London
  6. Smith EH (2013) Mechanical engineer's reference book, 12th edn. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, England; Boston
  7. Toth BA, Ellis DS, Stewart WB (1988) Computer-designed prostheses for orbitocranial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:315-324 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198803000-00001
  8. Owusu JA, Boahene K (2015) Update of patient-specific maxillofacial implant. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 23:261-264 https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000175
  9. Levine JP, Patel A, Saadeh PB, Hirsch DL (2012) Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniomaxillofacial surgery: the new state of the art. J Craniofac Surg 23:288-293 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241ba92
  10. Peel S, Bhatia S, Eggbeer D, Morris DS, Hayhurst C (2017) Evolution of design considerations in complex craniofacial reconstruction using patient-specific implants. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 231:509-524
  11. Kang SH, Kim MK, Lee JY (2016) Single-tooth dento-osseous osteotomy with a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guide. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:127-130 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.2.127
  12. Jacobs CA, Lin AY (2017) A new classification of three-dimensional printing technologies: systematic review of three-dimensional printing for patientspecific craniomaxillofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:1211-1220 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003232
  13. Lee YC, Sohn HB, Kim SK, Bae OY, Lee JH (2015) A novel method for the management of proximal segment using computer assisted simulation surgery: correct condyle head positioning and better proximal segment placement. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 37:21 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0023-3
  14. Watson J, Hatamleh M, Alwahadni A, Srinivasan D (2014) Correction of facial and mandibular asymmetry using a computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing prefabricated titanium implant. J Craniofac Surg 25:1099-1101 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000659
  15. Parthasarathy J (2014) 3D modeling, custom implants and its future perspectives in craniofacial surgery. Ann Maxillofac Surg 4:9-18 https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.133065
  16. Gokuldoss PK, Kolla S, Eckert J (2017) Additive manufacturing processes: selective laser melting, electron beam melting and binder jetting-selection guidelines. Materials (Basel) 10:E672
  17. Sidambe AT (2014) Biocompatibility of advanced manufactured titanium implants-a review. Materials (Basel) 7:8168-8188 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7128168
  18. Fina F, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW (2017) Selective laser sintering (SLS) 3D printing of medicines. Int J Pharm 529:285-293 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.06.082
  19. Otawa N, Sumida T, Kitagaki H et al (2015) Custom-made titanium devices as membranes for bone augmentation in implant treatment: modeling accuracy of titanium products constructed with selective laser melting. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:1289-1295 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.05.006
  20. Bandyopadhyay A, Krishna BV, Xue W, Bose S (2009) Application of laser engineered net shaping (LENS) to manufacture porous and functionally graded structures for load bearing implants. J Mater Sci Mater Med 20(Suppl 1):S29-S34
  21. Fafenrot S, Grimmelsmann N, Wortmann M, Ehrmann A (2017) Threedimensional (3D) printing of polymer-metal hybrid materials by fused deposition modeling. Materials (Basel) 10:E1199
  22. Rubin JP, Yaremchuk MJ (1997) Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1336-1353 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199710000-00043
  23. Zanotti B, Zingaretti N, Verlicchi A, Robiony M, Alfieri A, Parodi PC (2016) Cranioplasty: review of materials. J Craniofac Surg 27:2061-2072 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003025
  24. Aydin S, Kucukyuruk B, Abuzayed B, Aydin S, Sanus GZ (2011) Cranioplasty: review of materials and techniques. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2:162-167 https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.83584
  25. Acero J, Calderon J, Salmeron JI, Verdaguer JJ, Concejo C, Somacarrera ML (1999) The behaviour of titanium as a biomaterial: microscopy study of plates and surrounding tissues in facial osteosynthesis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 27:117-123 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(99)80025-0
  26. Schipper J, Ridder GJ, Spetzger U, Teszler CB, Fradis M, Maier W (2004) Individual prefabricated titanium implants and titanium mesh in skull base reconstructive surgery. A report of cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 261:282-290 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-003-0686-8
  27. Shah AM, Jung H, Skirboll S (2014) Materials used in cranioplasty: a history and analysis. Neurosurg Focus 36:E19 https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13561
  28. Ridwan-Pramana A, Wolff J, Raziei A, Ashton-James CE, Forouzanfar T (2015) Porous polyethylene implants in facial reconstruction: outcome and complications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:1330-1334 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.022
  29. Wellisz T (1993) Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant. Aesthet Plast Surg 17:339-344 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00437109
  30. Frodel JL, Lee S (1998) The use of high-density polyethylene implants in facial deformities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124:1219-1223 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.124.11.1219
  31. Haq J, Patel N, Weimer K, Matthews NS (2014) Single stage treatment of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint using patient-specific total joint replacement and virtual surgical planning. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:350-355 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.01.004
  32. Kozakiewicz M, Szymor P (2013) Comparison of pre-bent titanium mesh versus polyethylene implants in patient specific orbital reconstructions. Head Face Med 9:32 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-9-32
  33. Alonso-Rodriguez E, Cebrian JL, Nieto MJ, Del Castillo JL, Hernandez-Godoy J, Burgueno M (2015) Polyetheretherketone custom-made implants for craniofacial defects: report of 14 cases and review of the literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:1232-1238 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.04.028
  34. O'Reilly EB, Barnett S, Madden C, Welch B, Mickey B, Rozen S (2015) Computedtomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68:329-338 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.11.001
  35. Tesavibul P, Chantaweroad S, Laohaprapanon A et al (2015) Biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite scaffolds processed by lithography-based additive manufacturing. Biomed Mater Eng 26:31-38
  36. Garagiola U, Grigolato R, Soldo R et al (2016) Computer-aided design/computeraided manufacturing of hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone reconstruction in jawbone atrophy: a systematic review and case report. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 38:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0048-7
  37. Zhang L, Shen S, Yu H, Shen SG, Wang X (2015) Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing hydroxyapatite/epoxide acrylate maleic compound construction for craniomaxillofacial bone defects. J Craniofac Surg 26:1477-1481 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001410
  38. Figliuzzi M, Mangano FG, Fortunato L et al (2013) Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with custom-made, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds. J Craniofac Surg 24:856-859 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31827ca3a7
  39. Essig H, Lindhorst D, Gander T et al (2017) Patient-specific biodegradable implant in pediatric craniofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 45:216-222 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.015
  40. Xue AS, Koshy JC, Weathers WM et al (2014) Local foreign-body reaction to commercial biodegradable implants: an in vivo animal study. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 7:27-34 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1364199
  41. Wiltfang J, Merten HA, Becker HJ, Luhr HG (1999) The resorbable miniplate system Lactosorb in a growing cranio-osteoplasty animal model. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 27:207-210 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(99)80030-4
  42. Klammert U, Gbureck U, Vorndran E, Rodiger J, Meyer-Marcotty P, Kubler AC (2010) 3D powder printed calcium phosphate implants for reconstruction of cranial and maxillofacial defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38:565-570 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2010.01.009
  43. Zhao L, Patel PK, Cohen M (2012) Application of virtual surgical planning with computer assisted design and manufacturing technology to craniomaxillofacial surgery. Arch Plast Surg 39:309-316 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.4.309
  44. Danelson KA, Gordon ES, David LR, Stitzel JD (2009) Using a three dimensional model of the pediatric skull for pre-operative planning in the treatment of craniosynostosis-biomed 2009. Biomed Sci Instrum 45:358-363
  45. Daniel M, Watson J, Hoskison E, Sama A (2011) Frontal sinus models and onlay templates in osteoplastic flap surgery. J Laryngol Otol 125:82-85 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215110001799
  46. Hatamleh MM, Cartmill M, Watson J (2013) Management of extensive frontal cranioplasty defects. J Craniofac Surg 24:2018-2022 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a41bcc
  47. Azuma M, Yanagawa T, Ishibashi-Kanno N et al (2014) Mandibular reconstruction using plates prebent to fit rapid prototyping 3-dimensional printing models ameliorates contour deformity. Head Face Med 10:45 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-45
  48. Lim CG, Campbell DI, Clucas DM (2014) Rapid prototyping technology in orbital floor reconstruction: application in three patients. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 7:143-146 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1371080
  49. Liu YF, Xu LW, Zhu HY, Liu SS (2014) Technical procedures for templateguided surgery for mandibular reconstruction based on digital design and manufacturing. Biomed Eng Online 13:63 https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-63
  50. Soleman J, Thieringer F, Beinemann J, Kunz C, Guzman R (2015) Computerassisted virtual planning and surgical template fabrication for frontoorbital advancement. Neurosurg Focus 38:E5
  51. Park SW, Choi JW, Koh KS, Oh TS (2015) Mirror-imaged rapid prototype skull model and pre-molded synthetic scaffold to achieve optimal orbital cavity reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73:1540-1553 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.03.025
  52. Man QW, Jia J, Liu K, Chen G, Liu B (2015) Secondary reconstruction for mandibular osteoradionecrosis defect with fibula osteomyocutaneous flap flowthrough from radial forearm flap using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology. J Craniofac Surg 26:e190-e193 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001456
  53. Yamada H, Nakaoka K, Horiuchi T et al (2014) Mandibular reconstruction using custom-made titanium mesh tray and particulate cancellous bone and marrow harvested from bilateral posterior ilia. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48:183-190 https://doi.org/10.3109/2000656X.2013.848809
  54. Kim BJ, Hong KS, Park KJ, Park DH, Chung YG, Kang SH (2012) Customized cranioplasty implants using three-dimensional printers and polymethylmethacrylate casting. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 52:541-546 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2012.52.6.541
  55. Li J, Hsu Y, Luo E, Khadka A, Hu J (2011) Computer-aided design and manufacturing and rapid prototyped nanoscale hydroxyapatite/polyamide (n-HA/PA) construction for condylar defect caused by mandibular angle ostectomy. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:636-640 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9602-y
  56. Rotaru H, Schumacher R, Kim SG, Dinu C (2015) Selective laser melted titanium implants: a new technique for the reconstruction of extensive zygomatic complex defects. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 37:1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0001-9
  57. Jo YY, Kim SG, Kim MK, Shin SH, Ahn J, Seok H (2017) Mandibular reconstruction using a customized three-dimensional titanium implant applied on the lingual surface of the mandible. J Craniofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004119

Cited by

  1. 3D Printing—Encompassing the Facets of Dentistry vol.6, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00172
  2. Classification of the journal category "oral surgery" in the Scopus and the Science Citation Index Expanded: flaws and suggestions vol.45, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.4.186
  3. Correction of malocclusion using sliding fibula osteotomy with sagittal split ramus osteotomy after mandible reconstruction vol.42, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-020-00266-3
  4. Polyetheretherketone and Its Composites for Bone Replacement and Regeneration vol.12, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122858
  5. Cranial Implant Design Applying Shape-Based Interpolation Method via Open-Source Software vol.11, pp.16, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167604
  6. Correction of facial asymmetry using a patient-specific three-dimensional printed polycarprolactone/beta tricalcium phosphate scaffold: a case report vol.45, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.45.03.202109.143
  7. Bone Regeneration of a 3D-Printed Alloplastic and Particulate Xenogenic Graft with rhBMP-2 vol.22, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212518
  8. Applications of 3D-Printed PEEK via Fused Filament Fabrication: A Systematic Review vol.13, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13224046