The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제10권5호
  • /
  • Pages.340-346
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear bond strength of luting cements to fixed superstructure metal surfaces under various seating forces

  • Ozer, Fusun (School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) ;
  • Pak-Tunc, Elif (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University) ;
  • Dagli, Nesrin Esen (School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) ;
  • Ramachandran, Deepika (School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) ;
  • Sen, Deniz (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University) ;
  • Blatz, Markus Bernhard (School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.24
  • 심사 : 2018.08.22
  • 발행 : 2018.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. In this study, the shear bond strengths (SBS) of luting cements to fixed superstructure metal surfaces under various seating forces were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seven different cements [Polycarboxylate (PCC), Glass-Ionomer (GIC), Zinc phospahate (ZPC), Self-adhesive resin (RXU), Resin (C&B), and Temporary cements ((RXT) and (TCS))] were bonded to a total number of 224 square blocks ($5{\times}5{\times}3mm$) made of one pure metal [Titanium (CP Ti) and two metal alloys [Gold-Platinum (Au-Pt) and Cobalt-Chrome (Co-Cr)] under 10 N and 50 N seating forces. SBS values were determined and data were analyzed with 3-way ANOVA. Pairwise comparisons and interactions among groups were analyzed with Tukey's simultaneous confidence intervals. RESULTS. Overall mean scores indicated that Co-Cr showed the highest SBS values ($1.96{\pm}0.4$) (P<.00), while Au-Pt showed the lowest among all metals tested ($1.57{\pm}0.4$) (P<.00). Except for PCC/CP Ti, RXU/CP Ti, and GIC/Au-Pt factor level combinations (P<.00), the cements tested under 10 N seating force showed no significantly higher SBS values when compared to the values of those tested under 50 N seating force (P>.05). The PCC cement showed the highest mean SBS score ($3.59{\pm}0.07$) among all cements tested (P<.00), while the resin-based temporary luting cement RXT showed the lowest ($0.39{\pm}0.07$) (P<.00). CONCLUSION. Polycarboxylate cement provides reliable bonding performance to metal surfaces. Resin-based temporary luting cements can be used when retrievability is needed. GIC is not suitable for permanent cementation of fixed dental prostheses consisting of CP Ti or Au-Pt substructures.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee A, Okayasu K, Wang HL. Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts. Implant Dent 2010;19: 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181bb9033
  2. Mehl C, Harder S, Steiner M, Vollrath O, Kern M. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns. J Prosthodont 2013;22:618-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12058
  3. Mehl C, Harder S, Shahriari A, Steiner M, Kern M. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:1106-15.
  4. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70203-8
  5. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:737-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90194-F
  6. Heinemann F, Mundt T, Biffar R. Retrospective evaluation of temporary cemented, tooth and implant supported fixed partial dentures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006;34:86-90.
  7. Chaar MS, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:697-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02209.x
  8. Mehl C, Harder S, Schwarz D, Steiner M, Vollrath O, Kern M. In vitro influence of ultrasonic stress, removal force preload and thermocycling on the retrievability of implant-retained crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:930-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02236.x
  9. Good ML, Mitchell CA, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. Quantification of all-ceramic crown margin surface profile from tryin to 1-week post-cementation. J Dent 2009;37:65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.011
  10. Watanabe K, Ohnishi E, Kaneshima T, Mine A, Yatani H. Porcelain veneer bonding to enamel with plasma-arc light resin curing. Dent Mater J 2002;21:61-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.21.61
  11. Carter SM, Wilson PR. The effects of die-spacing on post-cementation crown elevation and retention. Aust Dent J 1997; 42:192-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1997.tb00121.x
  12. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Lilly KR. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part II. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:885-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90544-K
  13. Vermilyea SG, Kuffler MJ, Huget EF. The effects of die relief agent on the retention of full coverage castings. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:207-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90015-X
  14. Hembree JH Jr, Cooper EW Jr. Effect of die relief on reten- tion of cast crowns and inlays. Oper Dent 1979;4:104-7.
  15. Haddad MF, Rocha EP, Assuncao WG. Cementation of prosthetic restorations: from conventional cementation to dental bonding concept. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:952-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820fe205
  16. Bagheri R. Film thickness and flow properties of resin-based cements at different temperatures. J Dent (Shiraz) 2013;14:57- 63.
  17. Wilson PR. Low force cementation. J Dent 1996;24:269-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00074-7
  18. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:327-35.
  19. Piemjai M. Effect of seating force, margin design, and cement on marginal seal and retention of complete metal crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:412-6.
  20. Fonseca RG, de Almeida JG, Haneda IG, Adabo GL. Effect of metal primers on bond strength of resin cements to base metals. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:262-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60050-0
  21. Yoshida K, Kamada K, Tanagawa M, Atsuta M. Shear bond strengths of three resin cements used with three adhesive primers for metal. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:254-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90481-3
  22. Matinlinna JP, Lung CYK, Tsoi JKH. Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: A review. Dent Mater 2018;34:13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.002
  23. Özcan M, Matinlinna J. Surface conditioning protocol for the adhesion of resin-based cements to base and noble alloys: How to condition and why? J Adhes Dent 2015;17:372-3.
  24. Cherkasski B, Wilson PR. The effect of oscillation, low seating force and dentine surface treatment on pulpward pressure transmission during crown cementation: a laboratory study. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:957-63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01168.x
  25. Black S, Amoore JN. Measurement of forces applied during the clinical cementation of dental crowns. Physiol Meas 1993;14:387-92. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/14/3/018
  26. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. 8th ed. NC, John Wiley & Sons, 2012, p. 174-88.
  27. Jorgensen KD. Factors affecting the film thickness of zinc phosphate cements. Acta Odontol Scand 1960;18:479-90. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356009043879
  28. D’Souza R, Shetty O, Puppala P, Shetty N. A better bond: Luting simplified. Int J Prosthet Rest Dent 2012;2:77-81.
  29. Mitchell CA, Abbariki M, Orr JF. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns. Dent Mater 2000;16:198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00009-9
  30. Sen D. Cementation. 1st ed. Istanbul, Quintessence Publishing, 2012. p. 9-31.
  31. Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:343-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130401.x
  32. Hattar S, Hatamleh M, Khraisat A, Al-Rabab'ah M. Shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:411-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.022
  33. Bauer J, Costa JF, Carvalho CN, Souza DN, Loguercio AD, Grande RH. Influence of alloy microstructure on the microshear bond strength of basic alloys to a resin luting cement. Braz Dent J 2012;23:490-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000500004
  34. Raeisosadat F, Ghavam M, Hasani Tabatabaei M, Arami S, Sedaghati M. Bond strength of resin cements to noble and base metal alloys with different surface treatments. J Dent (Tehran) 2014;11:596-603.
  35. Kious AR, Roberts HW, Brackett WW. Film thicknesses of recently introduced luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101: 189-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60026-3
  36. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' Science of dental materials. 11th ed. Missouri, W.B. Saunders Company, 2003. p. 621-54.
  37. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's restorative dental materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia, Elsevier Mosby, 2012. p. 327-47.
  38. Almilhatti HJ, Neppelenbroek KH, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Pavarina AC, Giampaolo ET. Adhesive bonding of resin composite to various titanium surfaces using different metal conditioners and a surface modification system. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21:590-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-775720130255
  39. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS. Effect acidic and alkaline/heat treatments on the bond strength of different luting cements to commercially pure titanium. J Dent 2009;37:255-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.11.021
  40. Kern M, Thompson VP. Durability of resin bonds to pure titanium. J Prosthodont 1995;4:16-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1995.tb00309.x
  41. Technical data sheet RelyX U200. 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA; 2011.
  42. Safety data sheet C&B. BISCO, Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA; 2015.
  43. Yoshida K, Kamada K, Sawase T, Atsuta M. Effect of three adhesive primers for a noble metal on the shear bond strengths of three resin cements. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:14-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00625.x
  44. McIntyre FM, Sorensen SE, Carter JM, Johnson RR. The effect of film thickness on the bond strength of polycarboxylate cement. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:461-7.
  45. Orsi IA, Varoli FK, Pieroni CH, Ferreira MC, Borie E. In vitro tensile strength of luting cements on metallic substrate. Braz Dent J 2014;25:136-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302290
  46. Subramaniam P, Kondae S, Gupta KK. Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010;34:309-12. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.34.4.p5h1068v41ggt450
  47. Hibino Y, Kuramochi K, Hoshino T, Moriyama A, Watanabe Y, Nakajima H. Relationship between the strength of glass ionomers and their adhesive strength to metals. Dent Mater 2002;18:552-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00086-0

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant-supported prosthesis: An in vitro study vol.12, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.75
  2. In Vitro Bonding Performance of Modern Self-Adhesive Resin Cements and Conventional Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements to Prosthetic Substrates vol.10, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228157
  3. Effect of Cement Layer Thickness on the Immediate and Long-Term Bond Strength and Residual Stress between Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic and Human Dentin vol.14, pp.18, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185153